Game #18 - May 27, 2026 - Carolina 4 at Montreal 0
Game #18 - May 27, 2026
  Carolina   4   at     Montreal   0
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
13 Caufield14 Suzuki15 Newhook
 8:06 8:06 0:00 0:00 E
20 Slafkovsky71 Evans93 Demidov
 6:23 6:23 0:00 0:00 E
76 Bolduc24 Danault17 Anderson
 5:52 5:52 0:00 0:00 E
13 Caufield14 Suzuki20 Slafkovsky
 4:14 4:13 0:01 0:00 E
15 Newhook71 Evans
 3:56 0:09 0:00 3:47 E
15 Newhook71 Evans93 Demidov
 2:55 2:55 0:00 0:00 E
85 Texier90 Veleno77 Dach
 2:53 2:53 0:00 0:00 E
76 Bolduc90 Veleno77 Dach
 2:35 2:21 0:14 0:00 E
13 Caufield - 14 Suzuki - 20 Slafkovsky - 93 Demidov 2:31 0:00 2:31 0:00 E
85 Texier24 Danault17 Anderson
 2:21 2:21 0:00 0:00 -1
71 Evans
 1:59 0:00 0:00 1:59 E
13 Caufield14 Suzuki93 Demidov
 1:39 1:39 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki24 Danault
 1:38 0:00 0:00 1:38 E
20 Slafkovsky24 Danault93 Demidov
 1:10 1:10 0:00 0:00 E
Others 11:48 10:01 0:44 1:03 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Matheson53 Dobson
 10:06 9:44 0:14 0:08 E
21 Guhle45 Carrier
 8:37 7:02 0:00 1:35 E
  8 Matheson45 Carrier
 6:55 3:57 0:00 2:58 E
48 Hutson53 Dobson
 5:21 5:19 0:02 0:00 -1
47 Struble48 Hutson
 5:02 5:02 0:00 0:00 -2
48 Hutson45 Carrier
 3:29 3:29 0:00 0:00 E
47 Struble45 Carrier
 2:58 2:58 0:00 0:00 E
48 Hutson
 2:41 0:00 2:41 0:00 E
21 Guhle53 Dobson
 2:25 0:54 0:00 1:31 E
  8 Matheson48 Hutson
 2:17 2:17 0:00 0:00 E
21 Guhle48 Hutson
 2:13 2:13 0:00 0:00 E
47 Struble21 Guhle
 2:08 2:08 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Matheson21 Guhle
 1:46 0:38 0:00 1:08 E
  8 Matheson47 Struble
 1:43 1:43 0:00 0:00 E
45 Carrier53 Dobson
 1:21 0:30 0:00 0:51 E
Others 0:58 0:09 0:33 0:16 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 13CC
14NS
15AN		 20JS
71JE
93ID		 76ZB
24PD
17JA		 13CC
14NS
20JS		 15AN
71JE		 15AN
71JE
93ID		 85AT
90JV
77KD		 76ZB
90JV
77KD		 13CC
14NS
20JS
93ID		 85AT
24PD
17JA		 8MM
53ND		 21KG
45AC		 8MM
45AC		 48LH
53ND		 47JS
48LH		 48LH
45AC		 47JS
45AC		 48LH 21KG
53ND		 8MM
48LH		 21KG
48LH		 47JS
21KG
24 Jarvis - 20 Aho - 37 Svechnikov 1:26 2:25 0:28 2:10 0:18 0:24   0:31     3:02 1:33 0:47 0:44 0:26 0:54     0:16 0:29 0:41  
71 Hall - 22 Stankoven - 53 Blake 1:40 1:19 1:35 0:03   0:51 0:38 0:19   0:42 0:55 2:23 1:12 0:20 0:22 1:33 0:12   0:27 0:14 0:55 0:37
27 Ehlers - 11 Staal - 48 Martinook 2:11 0:40 0:27 1:09     0:33     1:04 2:02 0:49 0:04 1:38 2:30 0:27 0:18   0:07 0:28   0:01
28 Carrier - 77 Jankowski - 50 Robinson 1:03 0:09 2:16 0:18   0:38 1:19 0:49   0:35 2:16 1:14 1:15 0:56     1:26         1:08
27 Ehlers - 20 Aho - 24 Jarvis - 37 Svechnikov         1:09             1:19 0:33           0:01      
19 Miller - 26 Walker 4:05 2:10 1:57 2:00   0:40 0:12 0:31 0:20 1:21 3:27 2:21 0:47 1:52 2:39 1:38 1:13 0:30 0:10 0:46 0:37 0:41
5 Chatfield - 74 Slavin 2:50 1:56 2:10 1:58   1:20 0:26 1:06 0:30   3:48 1:37 1:35 2:23 1:47 1:07 1:37 0:30 0:11 0:17 0:38 0:26
4 Gostisbehere - 21 Nikishin 0:45 2:04 1:37 0:06   0:50 2:06 0:23   1:00 2:04 2:56 1:09 0:11 0:22 0:31     0:31 1:07 0:56 0:55
19 Miller         1:04               1:03   0:01       1:19      
4 Gostisbehere         2:21     0:04       1:39 1:34                  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Caufield
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Newhook 42.1% 42.1%    
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 22.0% 21.9% 0.1%  
Suzuki-Slafkovsky-Demidov 13.1%   13.1%  
Suzuki-Demidov 8.6% 8.6%    
Suzuki-Danault-Demidov 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 10.1% 10.1% 0.1%  
Totals   86.7% 13.3%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Newhook 35.2% 35.2%    
Caufield-Slafkovsky 18.4% 18.3% 0.1%  
Caufield-Slafkovsky-Demidov 10.9%   10.9%  
Caufield-Demidov 7.2% 7.2%    
Danault 7.1%     7.1%
Others 21.1% 19.7% 0.8% 0.7%
Totals   80.4% 11.8% 7.8%
15 Newhook
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Caufield-Suzuki 44.3% 44.3%    
Evans 21.5% 0.8%   20.7%
Evans-Demidov 16.0% 16.0%    
Bolduc-Dach-Texier 3.0%   3.0%  
Caufield-Evans 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 13.0% 11.6% 0.5% 0.9%
Totals   74.8% 3.6% 21.6%
17 Anderson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bolduc-Danault 52.6% 52.6%    
Texier-Danault 21.1% 21.1%    
Danault 7.8%     7.8%
Caufield-Suzuki 4.8% 4.8%    
Bolduc-Suzuki 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 10.6% 10.5%   0.1%
Totals   92.1%   7.9%
20 Slafkovsky
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Demidov 36.9% 36.9%    
Caufield-Suzuki 24.5% 24.4% 0.1%  
Caufield-Suzuki-Demidov 14.5%   14.5%  
Danault-Demidov 6.7% 6.7%    
Bolduc-Suzuki 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 12.4% 12.4%    
Totals   85.4% 14.6%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bolduc-Anderson 41.1% 41.1%    
Texier-Anderson 16.5% 16.5%    
Suzuki 11.4%     11.4%
Slafkovsky-Demidov 8.2% 8.2%    
Anderson 6.1%     6.1%
Others 16.7% 16.5%   0.2%
Totals   82.2%   17.8%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Slafkovsky-Demidov 34.5% 34.5%    
Newhook 21.3% 0.8%   20.5%
Newhook-Demidov 15.8% 15.8%    
  10.7%     10.7%
Dach-Demidov 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 13.1% 13.0%   0.1%
Totals   68.7%   31.3%
76 Bolduc
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Anderson 51.2% 51.2%    
Veleno-Dach 22.6% 20.5% 2.0%  
Suzuki-Slafkovsky 7.4% 7.4%    
Newhook-Dach-Texier 4.8%   4.8%  
Evans-Demidov 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 10.2% 9.6% 0.6%  
Totals   92.6% 7.4%  
77 Dach
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Texier-Veleno 33.0% 33.0%    
Bolduc-Veleno 29.5% 26.9% 2.7%  
Evans-Demidov 9.7% 9.7%    
Slafkovsky-Evans 8.0% 8.0%    
Newhook-Bolduc-Texier 6.3%   6.3%  
Others 13.5% 11.4% 2.1%  
Totals   89.0% 11.0%  
85 Texier
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Veleno-Dach 44.4% 44.4%    
Danault-Anderson 36.2% 36.2%    
Newhook-Bolduc-Dach 8.5%   8.5%  
Danault-Dach 4.6% 4.6%    
Veleno-Anderson 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 4.1% 3.8% 0.3%  
Totals   91.3% 8.7%  
90 Veleno
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Texier-Dach 47.4% 47.4%    
Bolduc-Dach 42.5% 38.6% 3.8%  
Slafkovsky-Dach 2.7% 2.7%    
Texier-Anderson 2.5% 2.5%    
Evans-Dach 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.6% 2.5% 1.1%  
Totals   95.1% 4.9%  
93 Demidov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Slafkovsky-Evans 33.8% 33.8%    
Newhook-Evans 15.5% 15.5%    
Caufield-Suzuki-Slafkovsky 13.3%   13.3%  
Caufield-Suzuki 8.7% 8.7%    
Slafkovsky-Danault 6.2% 6.2%    
Others 22.4% 22.0% 0.4%  
Totals   86.2% 13.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Matheson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dobson 43.8% 42.2% 1.0% 0.6%
Carrier 30.0% 17.1%   12.9%
Hutson 9.9% 9.9%    
Guhle 7.7% 2.7%   4.9%
Struble 7.4% 7.4%    
Others 1.3% 0.2%   1.1%
Totals   79.6% 1.0% 19.4%
21 Guhle
Partner Total EV PP SH
Carrier 49.4% 40.3%   9.1%
Dobson 13.8% 5.2%   8.7%
Hutson 12.7% 12.7%    
Struble 12.2% 12.2%    
Matheson 10.1% 3.6%   6.5%
Others 1.7% 0.2%   1.5%
Totals   74.2%   25.8%
45 Carrier
Partner Total EV PP SH
Guhle 36.9% 30.1%   6.8%
Matheson 29.6% 16.9%   12.7%
Hutson 14.9% 14.9%    
Struble 12.7% 12.7%    
Dobson 5.8% 2.1%   3.6%
Totals   76.9%   23.1%
47 Struble
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hutson 42.2% 42.2%    
Carrier 24.9% 24.9%    
Guhle 17.9% 17.9%    
Matheson 14.4% 14.4%    
  0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
48 Hutson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dobson 25.4% 25.2% 0.2%  
Struble 23.9% 23.9%    
Carrier 16.5% 16.5%    
  12.7%   12.7%  
Matheson 10.8% 10.8%    
Others 10.6% 10.6%    
Totals   87.1% 12.9%  
53 Dobson
Partner Total EV PP SH
Matheson 50.3% 48.5% 1.2% 0.7%
Hutson 26.6% 26.5% 0.2%  
Guhle 12.0% 4.5%   7.6%
Carrier 6.7% 2.5%   4.2%
  2.7%   2.7%  
Others 1.6% 0.3%   1.2%
Totals   82.2% 4.1% 13.7%
Back to main page