CS4025 Internet-Based
Software Engineering
2007-2008 Winter Term
Text Book:
- Programming the World Wide Web (4th edition) by
Robert W. Sebesta, Addison Wesley, 2008
- Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (6th
edition) (Chpaters 16 – 19) by Roger S. Pressman, McGraw Hill, 2005.
Course Description:
Software technologies, methods, and processes for modeling and developing
secure Internet-based enterprise applications. Internet standards and
protocols, Web technologies, distributed objects and components, and
client-server computing. Course contents include:
- Web
engineering
- Model-driven
software development for enterprise applications.
- Multi-tier
architectures of Internet-based enterprise applications
- Web
Protocols and standards: HTTP, HTML, XHTML, XML.
- Client-side
computing: JavaScript, Java Applet
- Server-side
computing: CGI/Perl, server-side scripting/PHP
- J2EE
application development: Java Servlet, JSP, EJB
- .NET
application development: ASP.NET
- Web Services
- AJAX Web development
- Ruby-on-Rails Web development
Course Work and Marking
Scheme (final marks)
- 30% Assignments
- 20% Project
- 15% Midterm: close book. In
class on Thu. Feb. 28, 2008 (old midterm)
- 35% Final Exam: close
book. Old finals: 0 1 2 3
- Date and Time: 9:00am
– 12:00pm, Monday, April 14, 2008
- Location: C123
- Pre-Final Tutorial:
- Date and Time:
12:30-1:30pm, Friday, April 11, 2008.
- Location: ITC317
Course Information
Reference Information
§
Downloads: putty (for ssh), winscp (for ftp)
§
MySQL: how-to-guide, manual
§
HTML redirect example
§
Perl/CGI/MySQL example
§
PHP/MySQL example
§
ASP.NET/MYSQL example
Lecture Schedule and Notes (subject to
change)
· Alternative slides: php xml servlet/JSP .NET AJAX
ACADEMIC OFFENCES (From pages
43-45 f 2006-2007 Undergraduate Calendar)
Note:
Consideration of a request to withdraw from a course or courses involved in an
academic offence will not be given until the case is resolved
Academic
offences include, but are not limited to, the following:
A. PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism
includes:
- quoting verbatim or
almost verbatim from a source (such as copyrighted material, notes,
letters, business entries, computer materials, etc.) without
acknowledgment;
- adopting someone else's
line of thought, argument, arrangement, or supporting evidence (such as,
for example, statistics, bibliographies, etc.) without indicating such
dependence;
- submitting someone
else's work, in whatever form (film, workbook, artwork, computer materials,
etc.) without acknowledgment;
- knowingly representing
as one's own work any idea of another.
NOTE:
In courses which include group work, the instructor must define and warn
against plagiarism in group work. Unless an act of plagiarism is identified clearly
with an individual student or students, a penalty may be imposed on all members
of the group.
Procedures
In
the case of plagiarism, the instructor must make every reasonable effort to
discuss the case with the student or group and follow one of two courses of
action.
- If the instructor is
satisfied that the plagiarism was the result of a genuine
misunderstanding, the instructor shall submit the student's name to the
Registrar who shall advise the appropriate Dean, and the Chair of the
student's program or Department where applicable. The Registrar shall
notify the student by registered letter of the regulations governing
plagiarism, the possible consequences, the student's right to appeal, the
right to appear before the appropriate Appeals Committee, and the
procedures involved. While a case of genuine misunderstanding will not be
considered a student's first offence, a second plea of ignorance by the
student will be so considered. A student appealing the instructor's
decision must do so in writing within three weeks of the date of the
Registrar's notification. The student is urged to submit to the
appropriate Appeals Committee a written statement regarding the case.
In the case of plagiarism resulting
from genuine misunderstanding, the instructor may permit the student to submit
a genuine piece of work to be graded in place of the one plagiarized. If the
student does not appeal, the time allowed for submission of work is three weeks
from the date of the Registrar's letter of notification. In the case of an
appeal, where the instructor's decision is upheld, the period of time allowed
for submission is as determined by the appropriate Appeals Committee.
- If the instructor
decides that the plagiarism was deliberate, the instructor shall submit
the student's name and relevant evidence to the Registrar, who will advise
the Dean, and the Chair of the student's program or department where
applicable. The Registrar shall notify the student by registered letter of
the regulations, the right to appeal, the right to appear before the
appropriate Appeals Committee, and the procedures involved. The student is
urged to submit to the Committee a written statement regarding the case. A
student appealing the instructor's decision, must do so in writing within
three weeks of the date of the Registrar's letter of notification. At the
discretion of the Registrar, cases may be referred to the appropriate
Committee for review and action. The Registrar shall inform the student by
registered letter of the referral to the Committee, and the wish of the
Committee that the student be present when the case is heard.
Penalties for Deliberate
Plagiarism
Ina
case of deliberate plagiarism, the penalties are:
First Offence:
If the student does not appeal, or if, on appeal, the Committee upholds
the instructor's decision:
- A notation will be
placed on the student's transcript of academic record concerning the
academic offence. The length of time the notation appears on the student's
transcript of academic record is to be decided when the penalty is imposed
and will depend on the severity of the offence.
- The student may be
required to submit a satisfactory and genuine piece of work to replace the
one involving plagiarism. If the assignment is not resubmitted or is
unsatisfactory, the student will receive a grade of F(zero) in the course.
Note: If this penalty is assessed, the period of time allowed for
the submission of the work will be determined by the Registrar in
consultation with the faculty member making the charge, and, where
appropriate, the Committee.
- The student will
receive a grade of F (zero) on the piece of work and, depending on the
severity of the offence, may receive a grade of F for the course.
- Other penalties as
outlined in penalties for Other Academic Offences may be imposed.
Subsequent
Offence: Incases where the Committee considers
that the student has plagiarized again:
- The student will
receive a grade of F in the course and a notation of the academic offence
will appear on the student's transcript of record. The length of time the
notation appears on the student's transcript of academic record is to be
decided when the penalty is imposed.
- Other penalties as
outlined in penalties for Other Academic Offences may be imposed.