CS 6795 Semantic Web Techniques

Projects


Syllabus
Assigns
Notes
Labs
Project
Resources

Choose one to two other persons in the class as partners and propose a project topic.  Please select your partner(s) and your first, second and third choice of possible projects from the table in the newest Fall 20xy Projects below.  We will allocate according to all preferences and will allow justified modifications to the assigned topics. 

The project will consist of a written report and a class presentation in which all partners will participate equally.  Each project asks you to consider a tool (or a system of tools) to solve a problem, and to apply it to a specific problem or task.  It may ask you to extend the range of the tool.

Please answer the following questions in your write up: What problem area does the tool address?  Exactly what does the tool do? What are the characteristics of an ideal solution to problems in this area?  Does the tool offer an effective solution to such problems?  Why? Why not?  Did the tool help you solve your chosen problem/task? What other tools might have been applied? What other work and ideas in the area are relevant? What extensions to the tool might be worth considering?  In addition, follow any specific documentation hints in the description for your selected project.

The written Project Report shall be about 5 single-spaced pages per participant, and should be built around key high-level specification segments and examples (at least one simple, one medium-hard, and one hard example). Please do NOT copy material from the Web (use citations or point with URLs instead). The introduction should be short (maximally 3 sentences of ‘generalities’), quickly focus on how the approach of the project relates to previous work, and preview the actual work being done. The main documentation should start with an architecture overview (e.g., using a diagram) and proceed to more and more specifics. The conclusions should summarize the contributions and indicate what (immediate) future work could be done. Appendices can be used for any medium-size (up to 3 pages each) specification modules (in higher-level languages, e.g. in Prolog, POSL, N3, RDFS, XML, XSD, RNC, RIF Presentation Syntax, OWL 2 Functional-Style Syntax, ANTLR, or XSLT), test cases, sample I/O dialogs, and user guides / installation instructions. Since such appendices can alternatively be separate files uploaded at other parts of the Project Website, they do not count for the Project Report page limit. In the part about how to use the implemented system, a small number of (up to 3) half-page screenshot may be helpful (but are not required). Longer (more than 3 pages each) code listings etc. (in programming languages, e.g. in Python, Java, C#, or C++) must be uploaded separately on the Project Website (complete code listings and implementation details are mandatory). The Project Report will be assessed according to these criteria:  Quality of the work, effectiveness of the use of the tool, clarity of the ideas presented, quality of the writing (grammar, spelling, organization, formatting, references), ability to look beyond the tool(s) and to discuss the problem and tool extensions.

What you present in class will be based on slides and a demo.  Each project will have 5 minutes of presentation per participant followed by 5 minutes of questions from the audience and discussion for the entire project.  Please prepare a one-page ‘virtual handout’ that at the same time is a website entry page. It contains just the main points of your project – a page we can view later to remind ourselves of the ideas presented; perhaps present them over a tea/coffee to our colleagues; and something that incites people to click on the specific pages of your documentation website.  This virtual handout/entry page, like a poster, will be more effective if it uses an eye-catcher and clearly presents just the main ideas, and not every detail and nuance (these should be linked).

Please upload all results of your work on your UNB website(s): virtual handout/entry page, demo sources and examples, presentation slides, as well as written report.

Weighting: Written 60%, Presentation 30%, Handout 10%.  Team members will receive the same mark for the written report and virtual handout, but not necessarily for the presentation.

Fall 2014 Projects | Fall 2012 Projects | Fall 2011 Projects | Fall 2010 Projects | Fall 2009 Projects | Fall 2007 Projects |  Fall 2006 Projects | Fall 2005 Projects | Fall 2002-4 Projects

 

 


Maintained by Harold Boley