Game #08 - October 22, 2007 - Boston 1 at Montreal 6
Game #08 - October 22, 2007
  Boston   1   at     Montreal   6
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
 14:33 11:31 3:02 0:00 +1
84 Latendresse14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 13:55 9:47 4:08 0:00 +1
22 Begin28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
 8:45 8:45 0:00 0:00 +1
54 Grabovski20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
 7:44 7:44 0:00 0:00 +1
22 Begin20 Smolinski
 1:51 0:00 0:00 1:51 E
28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
 1:13 0:05 0:00 1:08 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 1:01 1:01 0:00 0:00 E
Others 10:58 7:01 2:59 0:58 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
 14:40 13:21 0:00 1:19 +1
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
 11:59 8:23 3:36 0:00 E
51 Bouillon32 Streit
 8:40 8:23 0:17 0:00 +2
79 Markov32 Streit
 6:44 2:07 4:37 0:00 E
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
 4:17 4:17 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
 3:44 2:39 0:00 1:05 +1
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
 2:35 0:52 0:47 0:56 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
 2:24 2:24 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov71 Brisebois
 1:49 1:00 0:49 0:00 E
32 Streit71 Brisebois
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:06 1:26 0:03 0:37 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Chipchura 76.6% 76.6%    
Chipchura 10.7% 0.7%   9.9%
Begin-Koivu 2.9% 2.9%    
Higgins-Koivu 2.8% 2.8%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 4.5% 2.9% 1.6%  
Totals   88.5% 1.6% 9.9%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 76.7% 60.7% 16.0%  
Begin-Ryder 4.4% 4.4%    
Ryder-Kovalev 4.1%   4.1%  
Latendresse-Kovalev 3.8% 0.9% 2.9%  
Higgins-Kovalev 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 8.1% 7.4% 0.7%  
Totals   76.3% 23.7%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Kovalev 81.4% 57.2% 24.2%  
Kovalev 5.9% 5.9%    
Latendresse-Higgins 5.7% 0.9% 4.8%  
Higgins-Ryder 4.0% 4.0%    
Grabovski-Kovalev 1.2%   1.2%  
Others 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   69.9% 30.1%  
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Grabovski-Dandenault 66.7% 66.7%    
Begin 15.9%     15.9%
Ryder-Grabovski 8.2% 8.2%    
Begin-Koivu 3.3% 3.3%    
Begin-Kostopoulos 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 4.2% 1.0% 3.2%  
Totals   80.9% 3.2% 15.9%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Ryder 82.4% 65.2% 17.2%  
Latendresse-Plekanec 5.5% 0.8% 4.6%  
Plekanec-Ryder 3.9% 3.9%    
Koivu-Kovalev 3.1% 3.1%    
Ryder 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 3.0% 2.3% 0.8%  
Totals   77.5% 22.5%  
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 61.8% 61.8%    
Smolinski 13.1%     13.1%
Chipchura 6.2%     6.2%
Koivu-Ryder 5.9% 5.9%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 9.0% 8.4%   0.6%
Totals   80.1%   19.9%
25 Dandenault (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Grabovski-Smolinski 87.4% 87.4%    
Latendresse-Plekanec 2.1% 2.1%    
Grabovski-Plekanec 1.1% 1.1%    
Begin 0.9%     0.9%
Higgins-Koivu 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   92.1%   7.9%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Plekanec 76.3% 53.6% 22.6%  
Plekanec 5.6% 5.6%    
Ryder-Koivu 4.3%   4.3%  
Latendresse-Koivu 3.9% 0.9% 3.0%  
Begin-Chipchura 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 6.8% 4.7% 2.1%  
Totals   67.9% 32.1%  
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Kostopoulos 72.5% 72.5%    
Kostopoulos 10.1% 0.7%   9.4%
Begin 7.3%     7.3%
Begin-Kovalev 4.7% 4.7%    
Latendresse-Kostopoulos 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 3.0% 1.9% 1.1%  
Totals   82.2% 1.1% 16.7%
54 Grabovski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski-Dandenault 78.9% 78.9%    
Ryder-Smolinski 9.7% 9.7%    
Koivu-Ryder 3.2% 3.2%    
Plekanec-Kovalev 2.0%   2.0%  
Smolinski-Kostopoulos 1.9%   1.9%  
Others 4.3% 2.4% 1.9%  
Totals   94.2% 5.8%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 77.5% 61.4% 16.2%  
Grabovski-Smolinski 5.1% 5.1%    
Begin-Koivu 4.4% 4.4%    
Koivu-Kovalev 4.2%   4.2%  
Higgins-Plekanec 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 5.2% 3.7% 1.4%  
Totals   78.2% 21.8%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 84.3% 59.2% 25.0%  
Plekanec-Higgins 5.9% 0.9% 4.9%  
Koivu-Kovalev 4.3% 1.0% 3.3%  
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 1.7% 1.7%    
Plekanec-Dandenault 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.7% 1.9% 0.8%  
Totals   65.9% 34.1%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 68.7% 62.5%   6.2%
Bouillon 20.1% 20.1%    
Hamrlik 11.2% 11.2%    
Totals   93.8%   6.2%
25 Dandenault (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 7.0%     7.0%
Totals   92.1%   7.9%
32 Streit
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 45.4% 43.9% 1.5%  
Markov 35.3% 11.1% 24.2%  
Hamrlik 13.5% 4.5% 4.1% 4.9%
Brisebois 5.4% 5.4%    
Hamrlik-Bouillon 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   65.4% 29.8% 4.9%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 57.5% 40.2% 17.3%  
Bouillon 17.9% 12.7%   5.2%
Streit 12.4% 4.2% 3.8% 4.5%
Komisarek 11.5% 11.5%    
Bouillon-Streit 0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.2%   0.2%  
Totals   69.0% 21.3% 9.7%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit 47.8% 46.3% 1.6%  
Komisarek 23.6% 23.6%    
Hamrlik 20.6% 14.6%   6.0%
Brisebois 5.3% 5.3%    
Markov 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   92.5% 1.6% 6.0%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 75.8% 53.1% 22.8%  
Markov 11.5% 6.3% 5.2%  
Streit 6.5% 6.5%    
Bouillon 6.1% 6.1%    
Totals   72.0% 28.0%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 60.4% 55.0%   5.4%
Streit 27.7% 8.7% 19.0%  
Brisebois 7.5% 4.1% 3.4%  
Dandenault 2.5%     2.5%
Bouillon 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 0.2%   0.2%  
Totals   69.4% 22.6% 8.0%
Back to main page