Game #25 - November 30, 2007 - Montreal 0 at New Jersey 4
Game #25 - November 30, 2007
  Montreal   0   at     New Jersey   4
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 15:17 11:01 4:16 0:00 E
84 Latendresse11 Koivu21 Higgins
 12:27 9:47 2:40 0:00 E
22 Begin20 Smolinski  6 Kostopoulos
 7:00 7:00 0:00 0:00 E
73 Ryder28 Chipchura25 Dandenault
 4:47 4:47 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Higgins11 Koivu73 Ryder
 2:12 1:43 0:29 0:00 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 1:46 0:06 0:00 1:40 E
28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
 1:46 0:24 0:00 1:22 E
22 Begin28 Chipchura  6 Kostopoulos
 1:39 1:39 0:00 0:00 E
20 Smolinski11 Koivu21 Higgins
 1:03 0:00 1:03 0:00 E
22 Begin
 1:02 0:00 0:00 1:02 E
Others 11:01 6:52 1:08 3:01 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
 15:28 13:16 0:04 2:08 E
51 Bouillon32 Streit
 11:33 9:36 0:54 1:03 E
79 Markov71 Brisebois
 8:04 7:52 0:12 0:00 E
79 Markov32 Streit
 6:21 1:27 4:54 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
 5:49 2:35 3:14 0:00 -1
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
 4:59 4:35 0:00 0:24 E
51 Bouillon71 Brisebois
 2:11 2:11 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
 1:07 0:00 0:00 1:07 E
44 Hamrlik25 Dandenault
 1:02 0:00 0:00 1:02 E
Others 3:26 1:47 0:18 1:21 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Smolinski 62.6% 62.6%    
Chipchura 15.8% 3.6%   12.2%
Begin-Chipchura 14.8% 14.8%    
Begin-Koivu 2.8% 2.8%    
Ryder-Smolinski 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   87.8%   12.2%
11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Higgins 69.4% 54.5% 14.9%  
Higgins-Ryder 12.3% 9.6% 2.7%  
Smolinski-Higgins 5.8%   5.8%  
Higgins-Dandenault 4.4% 4.4%    
Smolinski 3.2%     3.2%
Others 5.0% 1.8% 2.9% 0.4%
Totals   70.2% 26.3% 3.5%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 84.3% 60.8% 23.5%  
Kovalev 9.7% 0.6%   9.2%
Higgins-Ryder 2.5% 2.5%    
Higgins-Smolinski 2.0%   2.0%  
Higgins-Kovalev 1.4%   1.4%  
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   63.9% 26.9% 9.2%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Kostopoulos 58.4% 58.4%    
Koivu-Higgins 8.8%   8.8%  
Ryder-Dandenault 6.7% 6.7%    
Begin 5.7%     5.7%
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 15.0% 5.8% 3.1% 6.1%
Totals   76.4% 11.8% 11.8%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Koivu 65.0% 51.1% 13.9%  
Koivu-Ryder 11.5% 9.0% 2.5%  
Smolinski-Koivu 5.5%   5.5%  
Koivu-Dandenault 4.1% 4.1%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 10.3% 2.4% 4.8% 3.0%
Totals   70.2% 26.7% 3.0%
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski-Kostopoulos 58.9% 58.9%    
Chipchura-Kostopoulos 13.9% 13.9%    
  8.7%     8.7%
Dandenault 6.3%     6.3%
Smolinski 5.8%     5.8%
Others 6.5% 6.5%    
Totals   79.2%   20.8%
25 Dandenault (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Ryder-Chipchura 45.0% 45.0%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 8.6% 8.6%    
Ryder-Smolinski 7.5% 7.5%    
Higgins-Koivu 7.4% 7.4%    
Begin 7.1%     7.1%
Others 9.4% 6.9%   2.5%
Totals   80.7%   19.3%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 75.8% 54.6% 21.2%  
Plekanec 8.8% 0.5%   8.3%
Dandenault-Chipchura 4.5% 4.5%    
Kostitsyn-Smolinski 3.2% 3.2%    
Begin-Smolinski 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.5% 1.7% 3.8%  
Totals   66.8% 25.0% 8.3%
28 Chipchura
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Ryder-Dandenault 40.3% 40.3%    
Kostopoulos 14.9% 3.4%   11.5%
Begin-Kostopoulos 13.9% 13.9%    
Dandenault-Kovalev 7.7% 7.7%    
Latendresse-Dandenault 6.2% 6.2%    
Others 17.1% 12.6%   4.5%
Totals   84.0%   16.0%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 94.0% 67.7% 26.2%  
Smolinski-Kovalev 4.0% 4.0%    
Chipchura-Kovalev 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   73.8% 26.2%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chipchura-Dandenault 53.4% 53.4%    
Higgins-Koivu 24.6% 19.2% 5.4%  
Smolinski-Dandenault 8.9% 8.9%    
Higgins-Plekanec 5.0% 5.0%    
Latendresse-Chipchura 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 5.0% 5.0%    
Totals   94.6% 5.4%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Higgins 86.6% 68.0% 18.5%  
Chipchura-Dandenault 5.1% 5.1%    
Chipchura-Higgins 4.9% 4.9%    
Chipchura-Ryder 1.9% 1.9%    
Koivu-Kovalev 1.5%   1.5%  
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   80.0% 20.0%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 69.8% 59.8% 0.3% 9.6%
Bouillon 22.5% 20.7%   1.8%
Markov 5.0%     5.0%
Streit 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   83.2% 0.3% 16.5%
25 Dandenault (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 9.7%     9.7%
Bouillon 5.3% 5.3%    
Totals   80.7%   19.3%
32 Streit
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 59.5% 49.4% 4.6% 5.4%
Markov 32.7% 7.5% 25.2%  
Hamrlik 4.2% 2.7% 1.5%  
Komisarek 3.1% 3.1%    
Hamrlik-Bouillon 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   63.2% 31.4% 5.4%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 66.6% 57.1% 0.3% 9.2%
Brisebois 25.0% 11.1% 13.9%  
Dandenault 4.4%     4.4%
Streit 3.5% 2.2% 1.3%  
Bouillon-Streit 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   70.9% 15.5% 13.6%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit 57.3% 47.6% 4.5% 5.2%
Komisarek 24.7% 22.7%   2.0%
Brisebois 10.8% 10.8%    
Markov 3.9%     3.9%
Dandenault 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   84.5% 4.5% 11.1%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 50.2% 49.0% 1.2%  
Hamrlik 36.2% 16.1% 20.1%  
Bouillon 13.6% 13.6%    
Totals   78.6% 21.4%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 47.8% 46.6% 1.2%  
Streit 37.6% 8.6% 29.0%  
Komisarek 6.6%     6.6%
Bouillon 4.6%     4.6%
  3.4%     3.4%
Totals   55.2% 30.2% 14.6%
Back to main page