Game #62 - February 21, 2008 - Pittsburgh 5 at Montreal 4
Game #62 - February 21, 2008
  Pittsburgh   5   at     Montreal   4
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 15:33 11:24 4:06 0:03 -1
21 Higgins11 Koivu74 Kostitsyn
 10:01 9:39 0:22 0:00 E
32 Streit40 Lapierre73 Ryder
 6:15 5:54 0:21 0:00 E
84 Latendresse20 Smolinski25 Dandenault
 4:50 4:50 0:00 0:00 -1
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre73 Ryder
 2:48 2:28 0:20 0:00 E
32 Streit20 Smolinski73 Ryder
 2:18 2:18 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 1:49 0:05 0:00 1:44 E
32 Streit20 Smolinski
 1:42 0:00 0:00 1:42 E
21 Higgins11 Koivu27 Kovalev
 1:36 0:37 0:59 0:00 E
11 Koivu21 Higgins
 1:27 0:00 0:00 1:27 E
14 Plekanec - 11 Koivu - 46 Kostitsyn - 27 Kovalev 1:15 1:15 0:00 0:00 E
74 Kostitsyn11 Koivu25 Dandenault
 1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 E
Others 9:20 8:15 0:32 0:33 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov  8 Komisarek
 14:23 11:04 0:12 3:07 -2
51 Bouillon26 Gorges
 14:11 12:35 0:42 0:54 +1
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
 12:23 12:23 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov32 Streit
 5:44 1:46 3:58 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik  8 Komisarek
 2:33 1:48 0:20 0:25 E
51 Bouillon  8 Komisarek
 1:57 1:57 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik26 Gorges
 1:51 1:51 0:00 0:00 E
44 Hamrlik32 Streit
 1:30 1:07 0:23 0:00 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
 1:30 1:09 0:21 0:00 -1
44 Hamrlik51 Bouillon
 1:03 0:00 0:00 1:03 E
Others 2:55 2:11 0:44 0:00 E

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Koivu
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Kostitsyn 56.2% 54.1% 2.1%  
Higgins-Kovalev 9.0% 3.5% 5.5%  
Higgins 8.1%     8.1%
Plekanec-Kostitsyn-Kovalev 7.0% 7.0%    
Kostitsyn-Dandenault 6.2% 6.2%    
Others 13.6% 10.6% 3.0%  
Totals   81.3% 10.6% 8.1%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 76.7% 56.2% 20.2% 0.2%
Kovalev 9.0% 0.4%   8.5%
Koivu-Kostitsyn-Kovalev 6.2% 6.2%    
Higgins-Kovalev 3.5% 3.5%    
Streit-Ryder 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 3.0% 3.0%    
Totals   71.0% 20.2% 8.8%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Dandenault 44.4% 44.4%    
Streit-Ryder 21.1% 21.1%    
Streit 15.6%     15.6%
Higgins-Kostitsyn 6.0% 6.0%    
Kostitsyn-Dandenault 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 8.0% 5.5%   2.5%
Totals   81.9%   18.1%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Koivu-Kostitsyn 65.3% 62.9% 2.4%  
Koivu-Kovalev 10.4% 4.0% 6.4%  
Koivu 9.5%     9.5%
Plekanec-Kovalev 4.6% 4.6%    
Smolinski-Kostitsyn 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 6.0% 6.0%    
Totals   81.7% 8.8% 9.5%
25 Dandenault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Smolinski 55.8% 55.8%    
Kostitsyn-Koivu 12.7% 12.7%    
Latendresse-Koivu 9.0% 9.0%    
Latendresse-Lapierre 8.8% 8.8%    
Kostitsyn-Smolinski 6.2% 6.2%    
Others 7.5% 7.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 69.4% 50.9% 18.3% 0.2%
Plekanec 8.1% 0.4%   7.7%
Higgins-Koivu 7.1% 2.8% 4.4%  
Plekanec-Koivu-Kostitsyn 5.6% 5.6%    
Higgins-Plekanec 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 6.6% 4.7% 0.7% 1.2%
Totals   67.4% 23.4% 9.2%
32 Streit (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Ryder 32.8% 31.0% 1.8%  
Smolinski-Ryder 12.1% 12.1%    
Smolinski 8.9%     8.9%
Lapierre-Kostitsyn 2.7% 2.7%    
Kostitsyn-Ryder 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   66.4% 24.7% 8.9%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Ryder 52.7% 49.7% 2.9%  
Latendresse-Ryder 23.6% 20.8% 2.8%  
Latendresse-Dandenault 6.5% 6.5%    
Kostitsyn 5.2% 2.8%   2.4%
Streit-Kostitsyn 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 7.7% 7.7%    
Totals   91.9% 5.8% 2.4%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 80.7% 59.2% 21.3% 0.3%
Plekanec-Koivu-Kovalev 6.5% 6.5%    
Smolinski-Dandenault 2.8% 2.8%    
Smolinski-Kovalev 2.2% 2.2%    
Koivu-Kostitsyn 1.9% 1.1% 0.8%  
Others 6.0% 4.0% 2.0%  
Totals   75.7% 24.0% 0.3%
73 Ryder (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Streit-Lapierre 45.0% 42.5% 2.5%  
Latendresse-Lapierre 20.2% 17.8% 2.4%  
Streit-Smolinski 16.6% 16.6%    
Higgins-Lapierre 3.2% 3.2%    
Kostitsyn-Streit 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 5.9% 4.3% 1.6%  
Totals   89.8% 10.2%  
74 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Koivu 69.1% 66.6% 2.5%  
Koivu-Dandenault 7.6% 7.6%    
Higgins-Smolinski 4.5% 4.5%    
Lapierre 4.3% 2.3%   2.0%
Streit-Lapierre 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 11.0% 10.0% 1.0%  
Totals   94.5% 3.6% 2.0%
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski-Dandenault 50.3% 50.3%    
Lapierre-Ryder 29.2% 25.7% 3.5%  
Koivu-Dandenault 8.2% 8.2%    
Lapierre-Dandenault 8.0% 8.0%    
Smolinski-Kovalev 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   96.5% 3.5%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 89.2% 89.2%    
Bouillon 5.9% 5.9%    
Markov 3.5% 3.5%    
Gorges 0.8% 0.8%    
Hamrlik-Komisarek 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
8 Komisarek
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 74.5% 57.3% 1.0% 16.1%
Hamrlik 13.2% 9.3% 1.7% 2.2%
Bouillon 10.1% 10.1%    
Markov-Hamrlik 1.7% 1.7%    
Hamrlik-O'Byrne 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   78.9% 2.8% 18.3%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 80.4% 71.3% 4.0% 5.1%
Hamrlik 10.5% 10.5%    
Markov 8.5% 6.5% 2.0%  
O'Byrne 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   89.0% 5.9% 5.1%
32 Streit (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 30.1% 9.3% 20.8%  
Hamrlik 7.9% 5.9% 2.0%  
Totals   66.4% 24.7% 8.9%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 60.5% 60.5%    
Komisarek 12.4% 8.8% 1.6% 2.0%
Gorges 9.0% 9.0%    
Streit 7.3% 5.5% 1.9%  
Bouillon 5.1%     5.1%
Others 5.6% 2.0% 3.6%  
Totals   85.8% 7.1% 7.2%
51 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 78.8% 69.9% 3.9% 5.0%
Komisarek 10.8% 10.8%    
Hamrlik 5.8%     5.8%
O'Byrne 4.5% 4.5%    
Totals   85.3% 3.9% 10.8%
73 Ryder (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 3.7%   3.7%  
Markov 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   89.8% 10.2%  
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Komisarek 62.5% 48.1% 0.9% 13.6%
Streit 24.9% 7.7% 17.2%  
Gorges 6.5% 5.0% 1.5%  
O'Byrne 2.1% 2.1%    
Ryder 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 2.4% 1.4% 0.9%  
Totals   65.9% 20.6% 13.6%
Back to main page