Game #80 - April 1, 2008 - Montreal 3 at Ottawa 0
Game #80 - April 1, 2008
  Montreal   3   at     Ottawa   0
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
46 Kostitsyn14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 10:24 8:25 1:59 0:00 E
21 Higgins74 Kostitsyn73 Ryder
 7:05 5:07 1:58 0:00 E
22 Begin20 Smolinski  6 Kostopoulos
 6:17 6:17 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec27 Kovalev
 5:28 2:32 0:00 2:56 E
84 Latendresse40 Lapierre25 Dandenault
 5:02 5:02 0:00 0:00 +1
22 Begin20 Smolinski
 4:18 1:24 0:00 2:54 E
21 Higgins74 Kostitsyn25 Dandenault
 2:03 2:03 0:00 0:00 E
84 Latendresse21 Higgins73 Ryder
 2:01 2:01 0:00 0:00 E
20 Smolinski  6 Kostopoulos
 1:50 0:00 0:00 1:50 E
20 Smolinski73 Ryder27 Kovalev
 1:34 0:00 1:34 0:00 E
74 Kostitsyn40 Lapierre25 Dandenault
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
Others 12:50 9:10 0:26 3:14 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov26 Gorges
 16:43 13:33 0:00 3:10 E
44 Hamrlik71 Brisebois
 13:26 12:39 0:14 0:33 E
32 Streit  3 O'Byrne
 8:40 7:54 0:00 0:46 E
44 Hamrlik  3 O'Byrne
 4:20 1:40 0:00 2:40 E
79 Markov32 Streit
 4:00 1:05 2:55 0:00 E
79 Markov71 Brisebois
 3:11 0:58 1:34 0:39 E
26 Gorges  3 O'Byrne
 3:05 2:51 0:00 0:14 E
26 Gorges71 Brisebois
 2:15 1:22 0:00 0:53 E
44 Hamrlik
 1:21 0:00 0:00 1:21 E
44 Hamrlik26 Gorges
 1:14 0:48 0:26 0:00 E
Others 1:45 0:19 0:48 0:38 +1

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Kostopoulos
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Smolinski 49.5% 49.5%    
Smolinski 14.4%     14.4%
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 6.0% 6.0%    
Kostitsyn-Higgins 5.2% 5.2%    
Smolinski-Ryder 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 20.6% 19.0%   1.6%
Totals   84.0%   16.0%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Kovalev 55.6% 45.0% 10.6%  
Kovalev 29.2% 13.5%   15.7%
Kostitsyn-Kostopoulos 4.1% 4.1%    
Higgins-Kostitsyn 2.9% 0.6% 2.3%  
Higgins-Kovalev 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 5.4% 3.8%   1.6%
Totals   69.8% 12.9% 17.3%
20 Smolinski
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Begin-Kostopoulos 39.7% 39.7%    
Begin 27.2% 8.9%   18.3%
Kostopoulos 11.6%     11.6%
Ryder-Kovalev 9.9%   9.9%  
Kostopoulos-Ryder 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 8.2% 6.1%   2.1%
Totals   58.1% 9.9% 32.0%
21 Higgins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Ryder 42.3% 30.5% 11.7%  
Kostitsyn-Dandenault 12.2% 12.2%    
Latendresse-Ryder 12.0% 12.0%    
Dandenault 5.5%     5.5%
Kostitsyn 5.0% 4.0%   1.0%
Others 23.0% 13.7% 2.6% 6.7%
Totals   72.5% 14.3% 13.1%
22 Begin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Smolinski-Kostopoulos 52.1% 52.1%    
Smolinski 35.7% 11.6%   24.1%
Higgins 3.5% 3.5%    
Lapierre 3.0%     3.0%
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 2.8%     2.8%
Totals   70.1%   29.9%
25 Dandenault (F)
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Lapierre 50.1% 50.1%    
Higgins-Kostitsyn 20.4% 20.4%    
Kostitsyn-Lapierre 11.3% 11.3%    
Higgins 9.1%     9.1%
Ryder-Lapierre 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 5.5% 3.6%   1.8%
Totals   89.1%   10.9%
27 Kovalev
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kostitsyn-Plekanec 55.3% 44.7% 10.5%  
Plekanec 29.1% 13.5%   15.6%
Smolinski-Ryder 8.3%   8.3%  
Higgins-Plekanec 2.7% 2.7%    
Kostitsyn-Kostitsyn 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   65.5% 18.9% 15.6%
40 Lapierre
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Latendresse-Dandenault 47.6% 47.6%    
Kostitsyn-Dandenault 10.7% 10.7%    
Kostitsyn 7.7% 5.5%   2.2%
Kostitsyn-Kostitsyn 5.2% 5.2%    
Higgins 5.0%     5.0%
Others 23.7% 16.1%   7.6%
Totals   85.2%   14.8%
46 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Kovalev 69.4% 56.2% 13.2%  
Higgins 5.6% 4.4%   1.1%
Lapierre 5.5% 3.9%   1.6%
Plekanec-Kostopoulos 5.1% 5.1%    
Lapierre-Kostitsyn 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 10.8% 7.9% 2.9%  
Totals   81.2% 16.1% 2.7%
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Kostitsyn 59.7% 43.1% 16.6%  
Latendresse-Higgins 17.0% 17.0%    
Smolinski-Kovalev 13.2%   13.2%  
Kostopoulos-Smolinski 4.5% 4.5%    
Lapierre-Dandenault 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   70.2% 29.8%  
74 Kostitsyn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Higgins-Ryder 56.0% 40.4% 15.5%  
Higgins-Dandenault 16.2% 16.2%    
Lapierre-Dandenault 9.0% 9.0%    
Higgins-Kostopoulos 5.3% 5.3%    
Kostitsyn-Lapierre 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 9.2% 9.2%    
Totals   84.5% 15.5%  
84 Latendresse
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lapierre-Dandenault 61.4% 61.4%    
Higgins-Ryder 24.6% 24.6%    
Lapierre-Kostopoulos 6.1% 6.1%    
Smolinski-Dandenault 3.9% 3.9%    
Kostitsyn-Kostopoulos 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

3 O'Byrne
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit 51.5% 47.0%   4.6%
Hamrlik 25.8% 9.9%   15.9%
Gorges 18.3% 16.9%   1.4%
Markov 4.3% 0.5%   3.8%
Streit-Dandenault 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   74.4%   25.6%
25 Dandenault (D)
Partner Total EV PP SH
Streit-O'Byrne 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   89.1%   10.9%
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 71.3% 57.8%   13.5%
O'Byrne 13.2% 12.2%   1.0%
Brisebois 9.6% 5.8%   3.8%
Hamrlik 5.3% 3.4% 1.8%  
Markov-Brisebois 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   79.9% 1.8% 18.3%
32 Streit
Partner Total EV PP SH
O'Byrne 64.0% 58.3%   5.7%
Markov 29.5% 8.0% 21.5%  
Hamrlik 5.9%   5.9%  
Brisebois 0.5% 0.5%    
O'Byrne-Dandenault 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   66.9% 27.4% 5.7%
44 Hamrlik
Partner Total EV PP SH
Brisebois 63.5% 59.8% 1.1% 2.6%
O'Byrne 20.5% 7.9%   12.6%
  6.4%     6.4%
Gorges 5.8% 3.8% 2.0%  
Streit 3.8%   3.8%  
Totals   71.5% 6.9% 21.6%
71 Brisebois
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hamrlik 70.4% 66.3% 1.2% 2.9%
Markov 16.7% 5.1% 8.2% 3.4%
Gorges 11.8% 7.2%   4.6%
Markov-Gorges 0.8% 0.8%    
Streit 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   79.7% 9.4% 10.9%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 67.5% 54.7%   12.8%
Streit 16.2% 4.4% 11.8%  
Brisebois 12.9% 3.9% 6.3% 2.6%
O'Byrne 2.9% 0.3%   2.6%
Gorges-Brisebois 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   63.9% 18.1% 18.0%
Back to main page