Game #10 - February 7, 2013 - Montreal 4 at Buffalo 5 (SO)

Game #10 - February 7, 2013

Montreal

Buffalo

5 (SO)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.

NHL.com links:

Scoresheet Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play

Lines and defensive pairings

Line

Time

+/-

17 Bourque

14 Plekanec

21 Gionta

14:10

12:20

1:50

0:00

67 Pacioretty

51 Desharnais

72 Cole

11:24

9:13

2:11

0:00

-2

8 Prust

27 Galchenyuk

73 Gallagher

4:18

4:18

0:00

81 Eller

53 White

20 Armstrong

3:51

3:51

0:00

81 Eller

27 Galchenyuk

73 Gallagher

3:20

1:20

2:00

0:00

20 Armstrong

81 Eller

2:52

0:00

2:52

8 Prust

14 Plekanec

2:49

0:00

2:49

14 Plekanec

21 Gionta

1:49

1:34

0:00

0:15

8 Prust

81 Eller

20 Armstrong

1:43

1:38

0:05

0:00

17 Bourque

81 Eller

1:33

1:33

0:00

8 Prust

53 White

20 Armstrong

1:30

1:30

0:00

8 Prust

53 White

1:07

0:00

1:07

51 Desharnais

72 Cole

1:02

1:02

0:00

Others

13:32

8:54

0:27

4:11

-1

Pair

Time

+/-

55 Bouillon

76 Subban

16:36

15:33

0:17

0:46

-1

79 Markov

74 Emelin

16:15

11:50

0:00

4:25

26 Gorges

61 Diaz

16:00

10:54

0:00

5:06

79 Markov

61 Diaz

3:59

2:42

0:42

0:35

79 Markov

76 Subban

3:51

0:22

3:29

0:00

55 Bouillon

61 Diaz

3:30

1:25

2:05

0:00

26 Gorges

74 Emelin

2:35

2:13

0:00

0:22

Others

2:14

2:14

0:00

-1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair

17RB
14TP
21BG

67MP
51DD
72EC

8BP
27AG
73BG

81LE
53RW
20CA

81LE
27AG
73BG

20CA
81LE

8BP
14TP

55FB
76PS

79AM
74AE

26JG
61RD

79AM
61RD

79AM
76PS

55FB
61RD

26JG
74AE

82 Foligno - 63 Ennis - 21 Stafford

4:55

1:10

0:28

1:10

1:11

2:08

4:26

0:47

0:34

0:28

26 Vanek - 19 Hodgson - 29 Pominville

2:30

3:49

0:56

0:16

1:34

4:37

1:50

0:57

0:11

0:55

9 Ott - 55 Hecht - 25 Grigorenko

1:36

0:39

1:42

1:16

0:38

4:35

1:16

0:33

0:09

0:32

26 Vanek - 63 Ennis - 82 Foligno

0:46

1:29

0:07

2:16

1:44

9 Ott - 19 Hodgson - 21 Stafford

0:14

0:17

1:04

0:54

1:05

0:52

0:35

32 Scott - 8 McCormick - 42 Gerbe

0:56

0:31

1:02

0:12

0:05

0:49

1:29

0:05

0:15

3 Leopold - 10 Ehrhoff

2:57

3:45

1:13

1:24

0:10

2:39

3:41

3:32

0:35

1:25

0:41

6 Weber - 57 Myers

3:21

1:54

0:43

0:21

0:33

1:44

1:43

2:52

0:43

0:35

0:09

10 Ehrhoff - 29 Pominville

1:02

1:29

0:07

2:33

2:36

0:01

33 Brennan - 52 Sulzer

0:56

1:29

1:42

0:28

2:07

1:18

1:29

0:05

0:07

6 Weber - 52 Sulzer

1:48

1:33

0:09

0:59

2:08

2:02

0:05

0:59

33 Brennan - 57 Myers

0:39

0:03

0:08

0:15

0:12

0:29

1:23

0:58

2:36

10 Ehrhoff - 52 Sulzer

0:47

0:19

0:04

0:16

1:28

1:27

0:08

0:03

0:07

0:34

3 Leopold - 6 Weber

0:52

1:26

0:09

1:43

0:18

1:40

3 Leopold - 33 Brennan

0:32

0:25

0:50

0:54

0:50

0:45

0:29

10 Ehrhoff - 57 Myers

1:14

0:48

0:25

0:17

0:21

0:33

1:10

52 Sulzer - 57 Myers

1:14

0:41

0:39

0:52

0:01

1:02

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Prust

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Galchenyuk-Gallagher	29.8%	29.8%
Plekanec	19.5%			19.5%
Eller-Armstrong	11.9%	11.3%	0.6%
White-Armstrong	10.4%	10.4%
White	7.7%			7.7%
Others	20.8%	18.5%		2.3%
Totals		69.9%	0.6%	29.5%

14 Plekanec

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Bourque-Gionta	61.1%	53.2%	7.9%
Prust	12.1%			12.1%
Gionta	7.8%	6.8%		1.1%
Armstrong	3.8%			3.8%
Bourque	3.7%	0.4%		3.3%
Others	11.4%	8.1%		3.3%
Totals		68.4%	7.9%	23.7%

17 Bourque

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Plekanec-Gionta	72.5%	63.1%	9.4%
Eller	7.9%	7.9%
Desharnais-Gionta	4.4%	4.4%
Plekanec	4.4%	0.5%		3.9%
White-Gionta	3.3%	3.3%
Others	7.4%	5.7%		1.7%
Totals		85.0%	9.4%	5.6%

20 Armstrong

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Eller-White	29.5%	29.5%
Eller	22.0%			22.0%
Prust-Eller	13.2%	12.5%	0.6%
Prust-White	11.5%	11.5%
Prust-Galchenyuk	7.5%	7.5%
Others	16.3%	9.6%		6.8%
Totals		70.6%	0.6%	28.7%

21 Gionta

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Bourque-Plekanec	77.2%	67.2%	10.0%
Plekanec	9.9%	8.5%		1.4%
Bourque-Desharnais	4.7%	4.7%
Bourque-White	3.5%	3.5%
Eller-Plekanec	1.8%	1.8%
Others	2.8%	2.8%
Totals		88.6%	10.0%	1.4%

27 Galchenyuk

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Prust-Gallagher	40.3%	40.3%
Eller-Gallagher	31.2%	12.5%	18.8%
Prust-Armstrong	9.2%	9.2%
Pacioretty	7.0%	7.0%
Pacioretty-Desharnais	4.2%		4.2%
Others	8.0%	8.0%
Totals		77.0%	23.0%

51 Desharnais

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Pacioretty-Cole	68.4%	55.3%	13.1%
Cole	6.2%	6.2%
Bourque-Gionta	5.2%	5.2%
Prust-Cole	4.0%	4.0%
Pacioretty-White	3.7%	3.7%
Others	12.5%	7.5%	2.7%	2.3%
Totals		81.9%	15.8%	2.3%

53 White

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Eller-Armstrong	44.2%	44.2%
Prust-Armstrong	17.2%	17.2%
Prust	12.8%		12.8%
Eller	9.9%		9.9%
Bourque-Gionta	7.5%	7.5%
Others	8.4%	8.4%
Totals		77.2%	22.8%

67 Pacioretty

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Desharnais-Cole	78.2%	63.2%	15.0%
Galchenyuk	5.1%	5.1%
Desharnais-White	4.2%	4.2%
Desharnais-Galchenyuk	3.1%		3.1%
Desharnais	2.6%			2.6%
Others	6.7%	5.5%		1.3%
Totals		78.1%	18.1%	3.9%

72 Cole

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Pacioretty-Desharnais	81.3%	65.8%	15.6%
Desharnais	7.4%	7.4%
Prust-Desharnais	4.8%	4.8%
Prust-Galchenyuk	2.4%	2.4%
Pacioretty-Eller	1.7%	1.7%
Others	2.5%	2.5%
Totals		84.4%	15.6%

73 Gallagher

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Prust-Galchenyuk	49.2%	49.2%
Eller-Galchenyuk	38.2%	15.3%	22.9%
Bourque-Desharnais	5.2%	5.2%
Prust-Desharnais	2.9%	2.9%
Bourque-Galchenyuk	2.7%	2.7%
Others	1.9%	1.9%
Totals		77.1%	22.9%

81 Eller

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
White-Armstrong	23.8%	23.8%
Galchenyuk-Gallagher	20.6%	8.2%	12.4%
Armstrong	17.7%			17.7%
Prust-Armstrong	10.6%	10.1%	0.5%
Bourque	9.6%	9.6%
Others	17.6%	11.1%		6.5%
Totals		62.9%	12.9%	24.2%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

26 Gorges

Partner	Total	EV	SH
Diaz	80.3%	54.7%	25.6%
Emelin	13.0%	11.1%	1.8%
Markov	4.6%	4.6%
Subban	2.1%	2.1%
Totals		72.6%	27.4%

55 Bouillon

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Subban	79.6%	74.5%	1.4%	3.7%
Diaz	16.8%	6.8%	10.0%
Emelin	3.5%	3.5%
Emelin-Subban	0.2%	0.2%
Totals		85.0%	11.3%	3.7%

61 Diaz

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Gorges	67.7%	46.2%		21.6%
Markov	16.9%	11.4%	3.0%	2.5%
Bouillon	14.8%	6.0%	8.8%
Subban	0.6%	0.6%
Totals		64.1%	11.8%	24.1%

74 Emelin

Partner	Total	EV	SH
Markov	82.9%	60.4%	22.5%
Gorges	13.2%	11.3%	1.9%
Bouillon	3.7%	3.7%
Bouillon-Subban	0.2%	0.2%
Totals		75.6%	24.4%

76 Subban

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Bouillon	78.9%	73.9%	1.3%	3.6%
Markov	18.3%	1.7%	16.6%
Gorges	2.0%	2.0%
Diaz	0.6%	0.6%
Bouillon-Emelin	0.2%	0.2%
Totals		78.4%	17.9%	3.6%

79 Markov

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Emelin	65.0%	47.3%		17.7%
Diaz	15.9%	10.8%	2.8%	2.3%
Subban	15.4%	1.5%	13.9%
Gorges	3.7%	3.7%
Totals		63.3%	16.7%	20.0%

Back to main page