Game #12 - February 12, 2013 - Montreal 4 at Tampa Bay 3 (SO)
Game #12 - February 12, 2013
  Montreal   4   at     Tampa Bay   3     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Bourque14 Plekanec21 Gionta
 15:39 11:30 4:09 0:00 E
  8 Prust51 Desharnais72 Cole
 12:15 10:41 1:34 0:00 -1
67 Pacioretty27 Galchenyuk73 Gallagher
 10:17 7:47 2:30 0:00 E
32 Moen81 Eller20 Armstrong
 6:59 6:59 0:00 0:00 +2
14 Plekanec21 Gionta
 2:26 2:08 0:18 0:00 E
51 Desharnais72 Cole
 2:07 2:07 0:00 0:00 E
32 Moen81 Eller
 1:52 0:26 0:00 1:26 E
  8 Prust20 Armstrong
 1:43 0:00 0:00 1:43 E
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais72 Cole
 1:40 0:02 1:38 0:00 E
21 Gionta81 Eller
 1:26 0:12 0:00 1:14 E
14 Plekanec32 Moen
 1:20 0:00 0:00 1:20 E
81 Eller51 Desharnais72 Cole
 1:09 0:11 0:58 0:00 E
Others 6:07 4:26 0:21 1:20 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
26 Gorges61 Diaz
 18:27 15:24 0:00 3:03 E
79 Markov74 Emelin
 14:25 10:46 1:41 1:58 E
55 Bouillon76 Subban
 11:32 10:55 0:37 0:00 E
79 Markov76 Subban
 5:19 1:39 2:47 0:53 +1
79 Markov61 Diaz
 3:18 0:25 2:32 0:21 E
26 Gorges74 Emelin
 2:40 2:01 0:05 0:34 E
55 Bouillon74 Emelin
 2:19 2:19 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov
 2:02 0:02 2:00 0:00 E
55 Bouillon61 Diaz
 1:47 0:58 0:49 0:00 E
79 Markov55 Bouillon
 1:16 1:16 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:55 0:44 0:57 0:14 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 17RB
14TP
21BG		 8BP
51DD
72EC		 67MP
27AG
73BG		 32TM
81LE
20CA		 14TP
21BG		 51DD
72EC		 26JG
61RD		 79AM
74AE		 55FB
76PS		 79AM
76PS		 79AM
61RD		 26JG
74AE		 55FB
74AE		 79AM
91 Stamkos - 26 St Louis   0:26 0:38   1:25 0:46 0:38 1:13   1:54        
44 Thompson - 91 Stamkos - 89 Conacher 1:48 0:12 0:09 0:28     2:15 0:33 0:22          
91 Stamkos - 4 Lecavalier - 16 Purcell             1:56 0:19   0:24 0:21      
16 Purcell - 4 Lecavalier - 26 St Louis 0:02 2:03 0:23       0:22 0:46 1:22     0:16    
18 Hall - 44 Thompson - 19 Crombeen 0:15 1:47   0:27     0:24 1:52 0:29          
89 Conacher - 4 Lecavalier - 16 Purcell   0:48   1:31     1:23 0:34       0:08 0:27  
91 Stamkos - 4 Lecavalier - 26 St Louis 1:02     0:13     1:26 0:48 0:13          
11 Pyatt - 18 Hall 0:28 0:40 0:35           0:11   1:23 0:05    
17 Killorn - 11 Pyatt - 71 Panik   0:03 1:33 0:32     0:28 0:30 0:15     0:01 0:39  
16 Purcell - 91 Stamkos - 26 St Louis 0:33 1:42         1:29   0:17          
67 Pouliot - 11 Pyatt - 71 Panik 0:49   0:40 0:34     1:19 0:11 0:33          
6 Salo - 77 Hedman 5:31 3:03 2:59 1:50 0:36 0:30 5:24 3:18 4:04 1:16 1:27 0:41 0:39  
2 Brewer - 25 Carle 3:51 4:49 2:32 1:47 0:22 0:33 5:17 4:14 2:54 0:57 1:08 0:34 0:11  
3 Aulie - 15 Lee 1:55 2:46 2:54 1:49     2:35 2:59 2:48 0:10   0:08 0:20  
6 Salo - 25 Carle 0:35 0:30 0:38   0:08   0:47 0:49 0:08 1:15   0:34   1:33
2 Brewer - 77 Hedman 0:16     0:35 0:49   0:15 1:00 0:13   0:22      
6 Salo - 26 St Louis             1:15     0:24 0:21      

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Prust
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Cole 78.4% 68.3% 10.0%  
Armstrong 11.0%     11.0%
Moen 3.6%     3.6%
Desharnais-Bourque 1.7% 1.7%    
Plekanec-Gionta 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 3.8% 3.3% 0.5%  
Totals   74.8% 10.6% 14.6%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bourque-Gionta 72.8% 53.5% 19.3%  
Gionta 11.3% 9.9% 1.4%  
Moen 6.2%     6.2%
Armstrong 3.6%     3.6%
Pacioretty-Gionta 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 4.1% 3.7% 0.4%  
Totals   69.1% 21.1% 9.8%
17 Bourque
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gionta 89.2% 65.5% 23.6%  
Eller-Armstrong 2.8% 2.8%    
Desharnais-Cole 1.7% 1.7%    
Galchenyuk 1.6% 1.6%    
Galchenyuk-Gionta 1.5%   1.5%  
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   74.8% 25.2%  
20 Armstrong
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Moen-Eller 69.1% 69.1%    
Prust 17.0%     17.0%
Plekanec 7.6%     7.6%
Bourque-Eller 4.8% 4.8%    
Eller 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   75.4%   24.6%
21 Gionta
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bourque-Plekanec 75.3% 55.3% 20.0%  
Plekanec 11.7% 10.3% 1.4%  
Eller 6.9% 1.0%   5.9%
Pacioretty-Plekanec 2.1% 2.1%    
Bourque-Galchenyuk 1.3%   1.3%  
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   71.4% 22.7% 5.9%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 89.4% 67.7% 21.7%  
Bourque 2.5% 2.5%    
Bourque-Gionta 2.3%   2.3%  
Pacioretty-Cole 1.7% 1.7%    
Bourque-Gallagher 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   75.9% 24.1%  
32 Moen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Armstrong 63.6% 63.6%    
Eller 17.0% 3.9%   13.1%
Plekanec 12.1%     12.1%
Prust 5.2%     5.2%
Plekanec-Gionta 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   69.7%   30.3%
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Cole 68.1% 59.4% 8.7%  
Cole 11.8% 11.8%    
Pacioretty-Cole 9.3% 0.2% 9.1%  
Eller-Cole 6.4% 1.0% 5.4%  
Bourque-Cole 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 2.8% 2.3% 0.5%  
Totals   76.4% 23.6%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 77.1% 58.4% 18.8%  
Desharnais-Cole 12.5% 0.3% 12.3%  
Eller 5.2% 5.3%    
Plekanec-Gionta 3.2% 3.3%    
Galchenyuk-Cole 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   69.0% 31.0%  
72 Cole
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Desharnais 66.5% 58.0% 8.5%  
Desharnais 11.5% 11.5%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 9.0% 0.2% 8.9%  
Eller-Desharnais 6.2% 1.0% 5.2%  
Bourque-Desharnais 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 5.2% 4.7% 0.5%  
Totals   76.9% 23.1%  
73 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 96.3% 72.9% 23.4%  
Bourque-Galchenyuk 1.7% 1.7%    
Prust-Galchenyuk 1.7% 1.7%    
Galchenyuk-Pacioretty-Cole 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   76.6% 23.4%  
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Moen-Armstrong 53.6% 53.6%    
Moen 14.3% 3.3%   11.0%
Gionta 11.0% 1.5%   9.5%
Desharnais-Cole 8.8% 1.4% 7.4%  
Pacioretty 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 6.9% 6.9%    
Totals   72.1% 7.4% 20.5%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Diaz 83.3% 69.5%   13.8%
Emelin 12.0% 9.1% 0.4% 2.6%
Subban 3.1% 3.1%    
Bouillon 1.4%   1.4%  
  0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   81.9% 1.8% 16.3%
55 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 67.0% 63.4% 3.6%  
Emelin 13.5% 13.5%    
Diaz 10.4% 5.6% 4.7%  
Markov 7.4% 7.4%    
Gorges 1.8%   1.8%  
Totals   89.8% 10.2%  
61 Diaz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 76.5% 63.9%   12.6%
Markov 13.7% 1.7% 10.5% 1.5%
Bouillon 7.4% 4.0% 3.4%  
Subban 2.4% 0.1% 1.4% 1.0%
Totals   69.7% 15.3% 15.1%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 73.2% 54.7% 8.5% 10.0%
Gorges 13.5% 10.2% 0.4% 2.9%
Bouillon 11.8% 11.8%    
Markov-Subban 1.5%   1.5%  
Totals   76.6% 10.5% 12.9%
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 62.6% 59.3% 3.3%  
Markov 28.9% 9.0% 15.1% 4.8%
Gorges 3.7% 3.7%    
Diaz 3.2% 0.1% 1.8% 1.3%
Markov-Emelin 1.6%   1.6%  
Totals   72.0% 21.9% 6.1%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 54.1% 40.4% 6.3% 7.4%
Subban 20.0% 6.2% 10.5% 3.3%
Diaz 12.4% 1.6% 9.5% 1.3%
  7.6% 0.1% 7.5%  
Bouillon 4.8% 4.8%    
Others 1.1%   1.1%  
Totals   53.1% 34.9% 12.0%
Back to main page