Game #20 - February 27, 2013 - Montreal 5 at Toronto 2
Game #20 - February 27, 2013
  Montreal   5   at     Toronto   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Prust14 Plekanec21 Gionta
13:24 12:31 0:53 0:00 +1
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais11 Gallagher
13:16 10:54 2:22 0:00 +2
27 Galchenyuk81 Eller73 Ryder
10:46 9:52 0:54 0:00 -1
32 Moen53 White20 Armstrong
8:08 8:03 0:05 0:00 -1
32 Moen81 Eller73 Ryder
1:42 1:42 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais73 Ryder
1:10 0:32 0:38 0:00 E
14 Plekanec32 Moen
1:03 0:00 0:00 1:03 E
Others 10:31 9:26 0:08 0:57 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov74 Emelin
17:54 17:54 0:00 0:00 E
55 Bouillon26 Gorges
10:14 10:14 0:00 0:00 +2
22 Kaberle76 Subban
8:29 8:29 0:00 0:00 +1
26 Gorges76 Subban
6:46 6:46 0:00 0:00 -1
22 Kaberle55 Bouillon
6:00 4:36 1:24 0:00 E
79 Markov76 Subban
3:20 0:09 3:11 0:00 E
26 Gorges74 Emelin
2:33 2:28 0:05 0:00 E
79 Markov26 Gorges
1:21 0:12 0:00 1:09 E
55 Bouillon76 Subban
1:08 0:17 0:00 0:51 E
Others 2:15 1:55 0:20 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 8BP
14TP
21BG
67MP
51DD
11BG
27AG
81LE
73MR
32TM
53RW
20CA
79AM
74AE
55FB
26JG
22TK
76PS
26JG
76PS
22TK
55FB
79AM
76PS
26JG
74AE
16 MacArthur - 43 Kadri - 28 Orr 1:36 0:10 6:31 1:22 5:13 2:05 1:20 1:30 1:17   0:12
21 Van Riemsdyk - 42 Bozak - 81 Kessel 2:55 4:16 1:11 1:26 4:38 1:23 2:31 1:19 0:46   0:47
41 Kulemin - 84 Grabovski - 47 Komarov 4:06 1:45 0:29 0:02 2:45 1:10 0:29 2:19 0:49   0:09
41 Kulemin - 84 Grabovski - 11 McClement 2:48 1:10 0:13 1:30 0:51 2:59 2:09     0:02  
41 Kulemin - 11 McClement 0:03 1:58 0:28           0:39 2:27  
36 Gunnarsson - 53 Kostka 8:43 0:49 3:10 1:31 6:24 3:07 2:42 3:18 0:21   0:29
3 Phaneuf - 55 Holzer 1:43 9:03 0:53 1:08 4:34 2:36 3:34 0:47 2:09 2:19  
4 Franson - 45 Fraser 1:17 1:07 5:04 5:03 5:22 3:41 1:35 1:02 2:14   1:27

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Prust
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gionta 76.0% 71.0% 5.0%  
Eller-Moen 4.1% 4.1%    
Eller-Ryder 3.1% 3.1%    
White-Gionta 3.0% 3.0%    
Plekanec-Armstrong 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 10.9% 8.0%   2.8%
Totals   92.2% 5.0% 2.8%
11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Desharnais 88.4% 72.7% 15.8%  
Pacioretty-Plekanec 3.8% 3.8%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 2.6% 2.6%    
Prust-Plekanec 1.7% 1.7%    
Moen-Desharnais 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   84.2% 15.8%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Gionta 78.0% 72.8% 5.1%  
Moen 6.1%     6.1%
Pacioretty-Gallagher 3.3% 3.3%    
Prust-Armstrong 3.0% 3.0%    
Moen-Gionta 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 7.8% 4.7% 0.8% 2.3%
Totals   85.6% 5.9% 8.4%
20 Armstrong
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Moen-White 68.5% 67.8% 0.7%  
Galchenyuk-White 8.0% 8.0%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 4.5% 4.5%    
Prust-Plekanec 4.4% 4.4%    
Prust 4.2%     4.2%
Others 10.4% 8.8%   1.5%
Totals   93.5% 0.7% 5.8%
21 Gionta
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Plekanec 82.9% 77.4% 5.5%  
Prust-White 3.3% 3.3%    
Prust-Desharnais 2.3% 2.3%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 2.2% 2.2%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 7.2% 7.2%    
Totals   94.5% 5.5%  
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Ryder 77.6% 71.2% 6.5%  
White-Armstrong 6.9% 6.9%    
White-Eller 3.0% 3.0%    
Eller-Gallagher 2.8% 2.8%    
Eller-Gionta 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 7.2% 6.3% 1.0%  
Totals   92.5% 7.5%  
32 Moen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
White-Armstrong 66.0% 65.4% 0.7%  
Eller-Ryder 13.8% 13.8%    
Plekanec 8.5%     8.5%
Prust-Eller 5.8% 5.8%    
Plekanec-Gionta 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   90.8% 0.7% 8.5%
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 81.6% 67.1% 14.6%  
Pacioretty-Ryder 7.2% 3.3% 3.9%  
Pacioretty-Armstrong 3.3% 3.3%    
Prust-Gionta 2.3% 2.3%    
Pacioretty-Gionta 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 3.5% 3.5%    
Totals   81.5% 18.5%  
53 White
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Moen-Armstrong 73.7% 73.0% 0.8%  
Galchenyuk-Armstrong 8.6% 8.6%    
Prust-Gionta 4.8% 4.8%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 3.8% 3.8%    
Prust-Armstrong 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 6.0% 3.6%   2.4%
Totals   96.8% 0.8% 2.4%
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Gallagher 81.6% 67.0% 14.5%  
Desharnais-Ryder 7.2% 3.3% 3.9%  
Plekanec-Gallagher 3.5% 3.5%    
Desharnais-Armstrong 3.3% 3.3%    
Desharnais-Gionta 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   81.6% 18.4%  
73 Ryder
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Eller 73.9% 67.7% 6.2%  
Moen-Eller 11.7% 11.7%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 8.0% 3.7% 4.3%  
Prust-Eller 3.8% 3.8%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 0.9%   0.9%  
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   88.6% 11.4%  
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Ryder 68.5% 62.8% 5.7%  
Moen-Ryder 10.8% 10.8%    
Prust-Moen 4.6% 4.6%    
Prust-Ryder 3.5% 3.5%    
Galchenyuk-White 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 10.0% 9.7%   0.3%
Totals   94.0% 5.7% 0.3%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

22 Kaberle
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 56.9% 56.9%    
Bouillon 40.2% 30.8% 9.4%  
Markov 2.2%   2.2%  
Emelin 0.6% 0.6%    
Gorges 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   88.4% 11.6%  
26 Gorges
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bouillon 48.5% 48.5%    
Subban 32.1% 32.1%    
Emelin 12.1% 11.7% 0.4%  
Markov 6.4% 0.9%   5.5%
Markov-Emelin 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   94.2% 0.4% 5.5%
55 Bouillon
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gorges 53.9% 53.9%    
Kaberle 31.6% 24.2% 7.4%  
Subban 6.0% 1.5%   4.5%
Markov 5.2% 5.2%    
Emelin 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   88.2% 7.4% 4.5%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 83.8% 83.8%    
Gorges 11.9% 11.5% 0.4%  
Bouillon 3.0% 3.0%    
Markov-Gorges 0.9% 0.9%    
Kaberle 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   99.6% 0.4%  
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kaberle 43.0% 43.0%    
Gorges 34.3% 34.3%    
Markov 16.9% 0.8% 16.1%  
Bouillon 5.7% 1.4%   4.3%
Totals   79.5% 16.1% 4.3%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 74.3% 74.3%    
Subban 13.8% 0.6% 13.2%  
Gorges 5.6% 0.8%   4.8%
Bouillon 4.1% 4.1%    
Kaberle 1.4%   1.4%  
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   80.6% 14.6% 4.8%

Back to main page