Game #05 - October 1, 2014 - Montreal 3 at Chicago 1
Game #05 - October 1, 2014
  Montreal   3   at     Chicago   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Prust49 Bournival22 Weise
 11:24 11:24 0:00 0:00 +1
17 Bourque81 Eller26 Sekac
 10:44 9:31 1:13 0:00 E
96 Bowman53 Dowell37 Dumont
 8:24 8:24 0:00 0:00 +1
25 De la Rose58 Andrighetto60 Thomas
 7:58 7:11 0:47 0:00 E
25 De la Rose58 Andrighetto26 Sekac
 5:18 5:02 0:16 0:00 E
17 Bourque81 Eller60 Thomas
 4:36 4:36 0:00 0:00 +1
  8 Prust49 Bournival
 1:48 0:00 0:00 1:48 E
  8 Prust81 Eller
 1:14 0:00 0:00 1:14 E
22 Weise81 Eller
 1:12 0:17 0:00 0:55 E
Others 7:22 5:55 0:10 1:17 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
24 Tinordi84 Dietz
 17:46 17:46 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin64 Pateryn
 16:46 16:12 0:34 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu44 Drewiske
 12:55 12:55 0:00 0:00 +2
74 Emelin44 Drewiske
 3:05 0:00 0:00 3:05 E
28 Beaulieu84 Dietz
 1:56 0:30 1:26 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu64 Pateryn
 1:16 0:33 0:13 0:30 -1
44 Drewiske84 Dietz
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin84 Dietz
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
Others 4:08 2:16 0:13 1:39 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 8BP
49MB
22DW		 17RB
81LE
26JS		 96DB
53JD
37GD		 25JD
58SA
60CT		 25JD
58SA
26JS		 17RB
81LE
60CT		 24JT
84DD		 74AE
64GP		 28NB
44DD		 74AE
44DD
20 Saad - 91 Richards - 88 Kane 4:48 2:06 1:17 1:48 0:50   6:01 3:11 2:06  
10 Sharp - 19 Toews - 28 Smith 0:47 2:57 0:15 3:40 1:41 0:12 3:13 4:03 2:38  
29 Bickell - 65 Shaw - 23 Versteeg 2:39 1:50 1:33 0:13 0:03 2:57 3:44 2:49 3:04  
11 Morin - 16 Kruger - 53 Mashinter 0:49 1:53 3:17 0:35   0:25 1:41 3:12 2:00  
19 Toews - 65 Shaw - 10 Sharp - 88 Kane                   2:33
2 Keith - 7 Seabrook 5:28 4:01 1:00 2:04 0:47 1:52 7:15 3:34 4:36 0:48
27 Oduya - 57 Van Riemsdyk 1:44 2:28 4:07 4:35 1:34 1:51 4:01 8:34 3:36  
26 Cumiskey - 32 Rozsival 3:51 4:09 2:47 1:19 2:39 0:53 5:59 4:07 4:12  
2 Keith                   1:55

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Prust
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bournival-Weise 70.3% 70.3%    
Bournival 11.1%     11.1%
Eller 7.6%     7.6%
Andrighetto-Thomas 5.1% 5.1%    
Dowell 2.3%     2.3%
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   79.0%   21.0%
17 Bourque
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Sekac 61.0% 54.1% 6.9%  
Eller-Thomas 26.1% 26.1%    
Eller 5.1% 5.1%    
Dumont-Sekac 2.8% 2.8%    
Eller-Dumont 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   93.1% 6.9%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Bournival 83.4% 83.4%    
Eller 8.8% 2.1%   6.7%
Bournival 6.0% 2.2%   3.8%
Bowman-Bournival 1.1% 1.1%    
Prust-Eller 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   89.5%   10.5%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Andrighetto-Thomas 53.9% 48.6% 5.3%  
Andrighetto-Sekac 35.9% 34.0% 1.8%  
Dowell 2.7%     2.7%
Dowell-Sekac 2.0% 2.0%    
Eller 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 3.7% 2.6% 1.1%  
Totals   89.1% 8.2% 2.7%
26 Sekac
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bourque-Eller 60.9% 54.0% 6.9%  
De la Rose-Andrighetto 30.1% 28.5% 1.5%  
Bourque-Dumont 2.8% 2.8%    
De la Rose-Dowell 1.7% 1.7%    
Prust-Bournival 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   91.6% 8.4%  
37 Dumont
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bowman-Dowell 81.8% 81.8%    
Bourque-Sekac 4.9% 4.9%    
Bowman-Eller 4.1% 4.1%    
Bourque-Eller 3.1% 3.1%    
Bourque-Dowell 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
49 Bournival
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Weise 77.9% 77.9%    
Prust 12.3%     12.3%
Weise 5.6% 2.1%   3.5%
Prust-Sekac 1.7% 1.7%    
Bourque-Sekac 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   84.2%   15.8%
53 Dowell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bowman-Dumont 83.0% 83.0%    
De la Rose 4.0%     4.0%
Prust 3.6%     3.6%
De la Rose-Sekac 3.0% 3.0%    
Bourque-Dumont 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   92.4%   7.6%
58 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Thomas 54.0% 48.6% 5.3%  
De la Rose-Sekac 35.9% 34.1% 1.8%  
Prust-Thomas 5.6% 5.6%    
De la Rose 1.8% 0.7% 1.1%  
Bowman-Dumont 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   91.8% 8.2%  
60 Thomas
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Andrighetto 58.2% 52.4% 5.7%  
Bourque-Eller 33.6% 33.6%    
Prust-Andrighetto 6.1% 6.1%    
De la Rose-Eller 1.6% 1.6%    
Bowman-Andrighetto 0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   94.3% 5.7%  
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bourque-Sekac 53.7% 47.6% 6.1%  
Bourque-Thomas 23.0% 23.0%    
Prust 6.2%     6.2%
Weise 6.0% 1.4%   4.6%
Bourque 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 6.6% 6.6%    
Totals   83.2% 6.1% 10.8%
96 Bowman
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dowell-Dumont 89.5% 89.5%    
Eller-Dumont 4.4% 4.4%    
Andrighetto-Dumont 2.5% 2.5%    
Bournival-Weise 1.6% 1.6%    
Dowell-Sekac 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

24 Tinordi
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dietz 89.8% 89.8%    
Drewiske 4.6% 2.4%   2.2%
Pateryn 2.6%     2.6%
Emelin 1.5%     1.5%
Beaulieu-Pateryn 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   93.7%   6.3%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Drewiske 76.1% 76.1%    
Dietz 11.4% 2.9% 8.4%  
Pateryn 7.5% 3.2% 1.3% 2.9%
Emelin 2.8% 2.5% 0.3%  
Tinordi-Pateryn 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 0.6%   0.6%  
Totals   86.4% 10.6% 2.9%
44 Drewiske
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 68.5% 68.5%    
Emelin 16.4%     16.4%
Dietz 5.7% 5.7%    
Tinordi 4.9% 2.6%   2.3%
Pateryn 4.6% 2.5%   2.1%
Totals   79.2%   20.8%
64 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 81.9% 79.1% 2.8%  
Beaulieu 6.2% 2.7% 1.1% 2.4%
Drewiske 4.2% 2.3%   2.0%
Dietz 3.0% 3.0%    
Tinordi 2.5%     2.5%
Others 2.2% 1.4% 0.8%  
Totals   88.4% 4.6% 6.9%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 76.7% 74.1% 2.6%  
Drewiske 14.1%     14.1%
Dietz 4.9% 4.9%    
Beaulieu 2.1% 1.9% 0.2%  
Tinordi 1.4%     1.4%
Others 0.8%   0.8%  
Totals   80.9% 3.6% 15.5%
84 Dietz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Tinordi 78.9% 78.9%    
Beaulieu 8.6% 2.2% 6.4%  
Drewiske 4.7% 4.7%    
Emelin 4.7% 4.7%    
Pateryn 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 0.3%   0.3%  
Totals   93.3% 6.7%  
Back to main page