Game #51 - February 7, 2015 - New Jersey 2 at Montreal 6
Game #51 - February 7, 2015
  New Jersey   2   at     Montreal   6
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais22 Weise
 14:40 14:40 0:00 0:00 +2
27 Galchenyuk14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 13:58 13:24 0:34 0:00 E
25 De la Rose81 Eller60 Thomas
 8:31 8:31 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Prust37 Dumont26 Sekac
 5:34 5:34 0:00 0:00 -1
  8 Prust81 Eller26 Sekac
 3:58 3:58 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais11 Gallagher
 1:37 0:06 1:31 0:00 E
25 De la Rose37 Dumont60 Thomas
 1:29 1:29 0:00 0:00 E
51 Desharnais67 Pacioretty
 1:05 0:16 0:49 0:00 E
Others 9:08 5:57 1:11 2:00 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov76 Subban
 23:31 19:21 2:39 1:31 +1
74 Emelin77 Gilbert
 17:23 17:23 0:00 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu55 Gonchar
 14:34 14:34 0:00 0:00 E
Others 4:32 2:37 1:26 0:29 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
51DD
22DW		 27AG
14TP
11BG		 25JD
81LE
60CT		 8BP
37GD
26JS		 8BP
81LE
26JS		 79AM
76PS		 74AE
77TG		 28NB
55SG
14 Henrique - 21 Gomez - 18 Bernier 2:26 2:42 4:04 1:26 0:42 2:01 4:52 5:24
26 Elias - 19 Zajac - 9 Havlat 7:11 3:03 1:15 0:36   5:27 2:15 4:27
8 Zubrus - 23 Cammalleri - 68 Jagr 2:34 5:30 0:52 0:04 1:28 9:02 2:08 0:27
15 Ruutu - 16 Josefson - 20 Tootoo 0:48 0:59 1:15 3:09 1:19 1:18 5:12 2:00
14 Henrique - 16 Josefson   0:34       1:08    
5 Larsson - 6 Greene 7:26 5:34 2:13 1:42 0:01 11:15 3:19 5:28
2 Zidlicky - 7 Merrill 5:36 4:02 1:37 2:04 0:58 4:47 5:57 4:19
10 Harrold - 32 Fraser 0:54 1:59 4:07 0:57 2:19 3:14 5:24 3:47

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Prust
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Dumont-Sekac 49.3% 49.3%    
Eller-Sekac 35.2% 35.2%    
Eller 7.7%     7.7%
Dumont-Thomas 3.1% 3.1%    
Plekanec-Sekac 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   92.3%   7.7%
11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 80.6% 77.3% 3.3%  
Pacioretty-Desharnais 9.3% 0.6% 8.8%  
Plekanec 5.1% 5.1%    
De la Rose-Plekanec 2.6% 2.6%    
Prust-Plekanec 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   88.0% 12.0%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 75.3% 72.2% 3.1%  
Galchenyuk-Eller 5.3%   5.3%  
Gallagher 4.8% 4.8%    
Pacioretty 4.3%     4.3%
De la Rose-Gallagher 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 7.9% 7.8% 0.1%  
Totals   87.2% 8.4% 4.3%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Desharnais 94.3% 94.3%    
Pacioretty-Dumont 1.5% 1.5%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 1.5% 1.5%    
Pacioretty-Plekanec 1.5% 1.5%    
Pacioretty-Eller 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Thomas 73.8% 73.8%    
Dumont-Thomas 12.9% 12.9%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 3.9% 3.9%    
Eller-Sekac 3.8% 3.8%    
Dumont 3.6% 0.7%   2.9%
Others 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   97.1%   2.9%
26 Sekac
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Dumont 53.2% 53.2%    
Prust-Eller 37.9% 37.9%    
De la Rose-Eller 4.1% 4.1%    
Prust-Plekanec 2.2% 2.2%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 86.7% 83.2% 3.5%  
Plekanec-Eller 6.1%   6.1%  
Plekanec-Thomas 1.4% 1.4%    
Plekanec-Weise 1.4% 1.4%    
Desharnais-Gallagher 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 3.1% 1.9% 1.2%  
Totals   89.1% 10.9%  
37 Dumont
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Prust-Sekac 67.5% 67.5%    
De la Rose-Thomas 18.0% 18.0%    
De la Rose 5.1% 1.0%   4.0%
Prust-Thomas 4.2% 4.2%    
Pacioretty-Weise 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   96.0%   4.0%
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Weise 77.6% 77.6%    
Pacioretty-Gallagher 8.6% 0.5% 8.0%  
Pacioretty 5.7% 1.4% 4.3%  
Pacioretty-Thomas 4.8% 4.8%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 2.4% 1.4% 1.0%  
Totals   86.7% 13.3%  
60 Thomas
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Eller 70.2% 70.2%    
De la Rose-Dumont 12.2% 12.2%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 7.4% 7.4%    
Pacioretty-Eller 3.4% 3.4%    
Prust-Dumont 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 3.8% 3.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Weise 71.9% 71.9%    
Desharnais-Gallagher 7.9% 0.5% 7.4%  
Desharnais 5.3% 1.3% 4.0%  
Desharnais-Thomas 4.4% 4.4%    
Plekanec 3.9%     3.9%
Others 6.5% 5.6% 1.0%  
Totals   83.7% 12.4% 3.9%
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Thomas 55.1% 55.1%    
Prust-Sekac 25.7% 25.7%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 6.4%   6.4%  
Prust 5.6%     5.6%
De la Rose-Sekac 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   88.0% 6.4% 5.6%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gonchar 87.4% 87.4%    
Emelin 5.9% 5.9%    
Subban 3.6% 3.6%    
Gilbert 2.8% 2.8%    
Markov 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
55 Gonchar
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 86.9% 86.9%    
Gilbert 5.8%   2.9% 2.9%
Subban 5.1% 1.7% 3.4%  
Markov 2.3%   2.3%  
Totals   88.6% 8.5% 2.9%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gilbert 93.5% 93.5%    
Beaulieu 5.3% 5.3%    
Subban 0.8% 0.8%    
Markov-Subban 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 93.3% 76.8% 10.5% 6.0%
Gonchar 3.4% 1.1% 2.2%  
Beaulieu 2.4% 2.4%    
Emelin 0.6% 0.6%    
Markov-Emelin 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   81.2% 12.8% 6.0%
77 Gilbert
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 92.4% 92.4%    
Gonchar 5.1%   2.6% 2.6%
Beaulieu 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   94.9% 2.6% 2.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 97.9% 80.5% 11.0% 6.3%
Gonchar 1.6%   1.6%  
Emelin-Subban 0.3% 0.3%    
Beaulieu 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   81.1% 12.6% 6.3%
Back to main page