Game #55 - February 14, 2015 - Toronto 1 at Montreal 2 (SO)
Game #55 - February 14, 2015
  Toronto   1   at     Montreal   2     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
27 Galchenyuk14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 8:07 4:48 3:19 0:00 E
81 Eller25 De la Rose  8 Prust
 5:58 5:58 0:00 0:00 E
27 Galchenyuk14 Plekanec81 Eller
 5:53 4:15 1:38 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais22 Weise
 5:35 5:35 0:00 0:00 -1
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais11 Gallagher
 5:34 4:07 1:27 0:00 E
51 Desharnais67 Pacioretty
 4:02 4:02 0:00 0:00 E
49 Bournival25 De la Rose60 Thomas
 2:56 2:56 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec67 Pacioretty
 2:02 0:00 0:00 2:02 E
25 De la Rose81 Eller
 2:02 0:03 0:00 1:59 E
67 Pacioretty51 Desharnais60 Thomas
 2:00 0:54 1:06 0:00 E
49 Bournival20 Malhotra60 Thomas
 1:59 1:59 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec27 Galchenyuk
 1:46 1:46 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher81 Eller
 1:45 1:45 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Prust20 Malhotra
 1:28 0:00 0:00 1:28 E
  8 Prust20 Malhotra22 Weise
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
Others 12:45 9:59 1:04 1:42 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov76 Subban
 30:30 21:00 7:18 2:12 E
74 Emelin43 Weaver
 15:02 12:43 0:00 2:19 -1
28 Beaulieu74 Emelin
 6:25 6:14 0:00 0:11 E
28 Beaulieu55 Gonchar
 5:18 5:18 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin76 Subban
 2:22 0:33 0:49 1:00 E
28 Beaulieu76 Subban
 1:26 0:59 0:27 0:00 E
55 Gonchar43 Weaver
 1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 2:57 2:28 0:00 0:29 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 27AG
14TP
11BG		 81LE
25JD
8BP		 27AG
14TP
81LE		 67MP
51DD
22DW		 67MP
51DD
11BG		 51DD
67MP		 49MB
25JD
60CT		 25JD
81LE		 14TP
67MP		 67MP
51DD
60CT		 79AM
76PS		 74AE
43MW		 28NB
74AE		 28NB
55SG		 74AE
76PS
21 Van Riemsdyk - 42 Bozak - 81 Kessel 2:17 0:06 1:37 1:09 0:40   0:46 1:02 1:19 0:02 8:23 1:39 1:41   0:15
26 Winnik - 43 Kadri - 18 Panik 0:41 1:49 0:39 2:17 1:27   0:05     0:44 2:23 4:33 2:41 0:28  
25 Santorelli - 24 Holland - 47 Komarov 1:00 1:30 0:47 1:14 1:05   0:31       2:48 1:39 0:29 1:51  
23 Smith - 26 Winnik 0:23   0:22   1:22         0:14 2:33       0:14
42 Bozak - 81 Kessel           2:14         2:34 0:23 0:06    
44 Rielly - 46 Polak 1:24 0:05 1:13 4:12 1:54 2:15 1:15       7:18 6:00 2:02 0:24 0:26
4 Franson - 51 Gardiner 2:22 1:16 1:50 0:19 1:09 0:46 1:15     0:30 6:42 4:11 2:40 0:43  
12 Robidas - 55 Holzer 0:38 3:20 0:05 0:32 0:52 0:03 0:24     0:02 4:05 1:54 0:36 2:10  
46 Polak - 55 Holzer 1:55 0:36 0:37 0:07 0:37         0:18 3:36     0:42 0:12
4 Franson - 12 Robidas 1:25   0:43   0:05     0:26   0:48 2:34 0:12 0:15   0:37
44 Rielly - 51 Gardiner   0:41   0:07   0:58   0:12 0:24   1:41 0:28 0:08 0:37  
4 Franson - 44 Rielly               0:39 0:55   1:45 0:32     0:07
51 Gardiner               0:45 0:40   0:06 1:20     0:40

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

8 Prust
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-De la Rose 46.3% 46.3%    
Malhotra 11.4%     11.4%
Malhotra-Weise 8.8% 8.8%    
De la Rose-Weise 7.6% 7.6%    
De la Rose-Thomas 7.6% 6.5% 1.2%  
Others 18.2% 14.7%   3.5%
Totals   84.0% 1.2% 14.9%
11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 46.3% 27.4% 18.9%  
Pacioretty-Desharnais 31.7% 23.5% 8.3%  
Eller 10.0% 10.0%    
Eller-Plekanec 3.2% 3.2%    
Plekanec-Malhotra 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 5.6% 4.9% 0.7%  
Totals   72.1% 27.9%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 37.8% 22.3% 15.4%  
Galchenyuk-Eller 27.4% 19.8% 7.6%  
Pacioretty 9.5%     9.5%
Galchenyuk 8.2% 8.2%    
Galchenyuk-Malhotra 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 13.5% 12.0% 0.5% 0.9%
Totals   66.0% 23.6% 10.4%
20 Malhotra
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bournival-Thomas 20.9% 20.9%    
Prust 15.4%     15.4%
Prust-Weise 11.9% 11.9%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 8.4% 8.4%    
Weise 8.2%     8.2%
Others 35.1% 31.6%   3.5%
Totals   72.8%   27.2%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Desharnais 56.9% 56.9%    
Prust-Malhotra 11.5% 11.5%    
Prust-De la Rose 10.0% 10.0%    
Malhotra 8.0%     8.0%
Desharnais-Malhotra 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 8.1% 8.1%    
Totals   92.0%   8.0%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Prust 39.8% 39.8%    
Bournival-Thomas 19.6% 19.6%    
Eller 13.6% 0.3%   13.2%
Prust-Thomas 6.6% 5.6% 1.0%  
Prust-Weise 6.6% 6.6%    
Others 13.9% 13.0%   0.9%
Totals   84.9% 1.0% 14.1%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 46.7% 27.6% 19.1%  
Plekanec-Eller 33.9% 24.5% 9.4%  
Plekanec 10.2% 10.2%    
Malhotra-Plekanec 4.6% 4.6%    
De la Rose-Prust 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   71.5% 28.5%  
49 Bournival
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Thomas 54.8% 54.8%    
Malhotra-Thomas 37.1% 37.1%    
Malhotra-Prust 2.5% 2.5%    
De la Rose-Weise 1.9% 1.9%    
Malhotra-Weise 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Weise 28.7% 28.7%    
Pacioretty-Gallagher 28.6% 21.1% 7.4%  
Pacioretty 20.7% 20.7%    
Pacioretty-Thomas 10.3% 4.6% 5.7%  
Pacioretty-Eller 4.1%   4.1%  
Others 7.6% 7.6%    
Totals   82.8% 17.2%  
60 Thomas
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Bournival-De la Rose 31.2% 31.2%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 21.2% 9.6% 11.7%  
Bournival-Malhotra 21.1% 21.1%    
Prust-De la Rose 10.4% 8.8% 1.6%  
Eller-De la Rose 9.4% 9.4%    
Others 6.7% 5.5% 1.2%  
Totals   85.5% 14.5%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Weise 26.4% 26.4%    
Desharnais-Gallagher 26.3% 19.4% 6.9%  
Desharnais 19.1% 19.1%    
Plekanec 9.6%     9.6%
Desharnais-Thomas 9.4% 4.3% 5.2%  
Others 9.2% 5.4% 3.8%  
Totals   74.6% 15.8% 9.6%
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Prust 28.9% 28.9%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 28.5% 20.6% 7.9%  
De la Rose 9.8% 0.2%   9.6%
Gallagher 8.5% 8.5%    
De la Rose-Thomas 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 20.1% 12.7% 3.9% 3.5%
Totals   75.2% 11.8% 13.1%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 45.1% 43.8%   1.3%
Gonchar 37.3% 37.3%    
Subban 10.1% 6.9% 3.2%  
Weaver 5.6% 5.6%    
Markov 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   95.5% 3.2% 1.3%
43 Weaver
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 84.8% 71.7%   13.1%
Gonchar 5.6%     5.6%
Beaulieu 4.5% 4.5%    
Subban 3.9% 1.2%   2.7%
Markov 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   78.6%   21.4%
55 Gonchar
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 84.1% 84.1%    
Weaver 15.9%     15.9%
Totals   84.1%   15.9%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weaver 60.6% 51.3%   9.3%
Beaulieu 25.9% 25.1%   0.7%
Subban 9.5% 2.2% 3.3% 4.0%
Markov 2.6% 2.6%    
Markov-Subban 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   82.6% 3.3% 14.1%
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 86.3% 59.4% 20.7% 6.2%
Emelin 6.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.8%
Beaulieu 4.1% 2.8% 1.3%  
Weaver 2.0% 0.6%   1.4%
Markov-Emelin 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   65.3% 24.2% 10.4%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 95.5% 65.7% 22.8% 6.9%
Emelin 2.0% 2.0%    
Emelin-Subban 1.1% 1.1%    
Beaulieu 0.8% 0.8%    
Weaver 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   70.3% 22.8% 6.9%
Back to main page