Game #58 - February 17, 2016 - Montreal 2 at Colorado 3
Game #58 - February 17, 2016
  Montreal   2   at     Colorado   3

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
27 Galchenyuk14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
14:01 11:02 2:59 0:00 +1
41 Byron25 De la Rose22 Weise
12:06 12:06 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty81 Eller42 Andrighetto
11:34 9:07 2:27 0:00 E
53 Lessio17 Mitchell21 Smith-Pelly
9:18 9:18 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec41 Byron
1:21 0:00 0:00 1:21 E
Others 11:40 8:19 0:33 2:48 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov76 Subban
21:52 17:32 3:29 0:51 -1
28 Beaulieu77 Gilbert
19:41 16:56 2:25 0:20 E
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
10:08 10:08 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin77 Gilbert
4:09 1:59 0:05 2:05 E
79 Markov28 Beaulieu
1:21 1:21 0:00 0:00 +1
Others 2:49 1:56 0:00 0:53 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 27AG
14TP
11BG
41PB
25JD
22DW
67MP
81LE
42SA
53LL
17TM
21DS
79AM
76PS
28NB
77TG
74AE
6GP
74AE
77TG
25 Grigorenko - 9 Duchene - 12 Iginla 2:22 3:56 2:38 0:34 4:02 3:34 2:27 1:12
40 Tanguay - 29 MacKinnon - 92 Landeskog 1:06 1:36 2:07 2:53 4:04 2:52 1:29  
14 Comeau - 34 Soderberg - 27 Martinsen 2:27 0:30 1:19   1:27 1:55 0:57 0:27
27 Martinsen - 7 Mitchell - 55 McLeod 0:55 1:32 0:19 0:34 0:44 2:45 0:16 0:03
40 Tanguay - 29 MacKinnon - 8 Skille 0:29 2:24 0:28 0:16 1:56 1:45 0:05  
14 Comeau - 34 Soderberg 0:37   1:52   1:47 0:42    
55 McLeod - 7 Mitchell - 8 Skille 0:33 1:21 0:10 1:23 1:25 1:45   0:05
14 Comeau - 34 Soderberg - 92 Landeskog 1:55   0:27 1:07 0:31 0:18 2:19  
6 Johnson - 32 Beauchemin 8:24 3:19 3:22 1:33 9:59 5:14 4:02 0:42
2 Holden - 4 Barrie 1:29 3:04 7:26 1:48 5:31 7:04 2:10 0:46
3 Bigras - 41 Bodnarchuk 0:14 5:04   4:56 3:17 5:10 2:23 0:10
2 Holden - 32 Beauchemin 1:23   0:10   0:10 1:23    
4 Barrie         0:19     1:44

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 92.8% 73.1% 19.8%  
Byron-Plekanec 2.6% 2.6%    
Byron-De la Rose 2.3% 2.3%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 1.4%   1.4%  
Andrighetto-Eller 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   78.8% 21.2%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 72.1% 56.8% 15.4%  
Byron 6.9%     6.9%
Pacioretty 5.0% 1.2%   3.8%
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 3.8% 3.8%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 9.1% 7.4%   1.7%
Totals   72.2% 15.4% 12.4%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Smith-Pelly 80.6% 80.6%    
Eller 4.2%     4.2%
De la Rose 3.8%     3.8%
Lessio-Weise 3.0% 3.0%    
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 5.6% 5.6%    
Totals   92.1%   7.9%
21 Smith-Pelly
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Mitchell 85.1% 85.1%    
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 5.0% 5.0%    
Byron-De la Rose 3.0% 3.0%    
Byron-Mitchell 2.6% 2.6%    
Lessio-De la Rose 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-De la Rose 85.7% 85.7%    
Pacioretty-De la Rose 3.8% 3.8%    
Lessio-De la Rose 3.1% 3.1%    
Lessio-Mitchell 2.5% 2.5%    
Byron-Eller 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 2.7% 2.1% 0.6%  
Totals   99.4% 0.6%  
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weise 76.2% 76.2%    
Pacioretty 3.6% 1.0%   2.5%
Pacioretty-Weise 3.4% 3.4%    
Lessio-Weise 2.7% 2.7%    
Mitchell 2.7%     2.7%
Others 11.4% 8.3%   3.1%
Totals   91.6%   8.4%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 79.9% 62.9% 17.0%  
Plekanec-Andrighetto 4.2% 4.2%    
Pacioretty-Plekanec 3.4% 3.4%    
Plekanec-Smith-Pelly 3.1% 3.1%    
Eller-Andrighetto 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 6.4% 3.2% 3.1%  
Totals   79.8% 20.2%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Weise 77.2% 77.2%    
Plekanec 8.6%     8.6%
Plekanec-Gallagher 2.6% 2.6%    
De la Rose-Gallagher 2.2% 2.2%    
De la Rose-Smith-Pelly 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 7.2% 5.9% 0.5% 0.9%
Totals   90.0% 0.5% 9.5%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Eller 81.7% 64.4% 17.3%  
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 5.2% 5.2%    
Lessio-Eller 4.1% 4.1%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 3.7% 3.7%    
Pacioretty-Mitchell 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   82.7% 17.3%  
53 Lessio
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Smith-Pelly 81.9% 81.9%    
Eller-Andrighetto 5.1% 5.1%    
De la Rose-Weise 3.8% 3.8%    
Mitchell-Weise 3.1% 3.1%    
De la Rose-Smith-Pelly 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Andrighetto 76.2% 60.0% 16.1%  
Plekanec 6.4% 1.5%   4.8%
Plekanec-Galchenyuk 4.0% 4.0%    
De la Rose 3.7% 1.1%   2.6%
De la Rose-Weise 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 6.3% 3.0% 1.6% 1.6%
Totals   73.1% 17.8% 9.1%
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 79.4% 62.6% 16.8%  
Lessio-Andrighetto 4.0% 4.0%    
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 3.5% 3.5%    
Mitchell 3.3%     3.3%
Byron-Weise 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 7.6% 2.4% 3.2% 1.9%
Totals   74.7% 20.0% 5.3%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 88.1% 88.1%    
Markov 7.7%     7.7%
Beaulieu 2.8% 2.8%    
Beaulieu-Gilbert 1.0% 1.0%    
Markov-Subban 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   92.3%   7.7%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Gilbert 89.4% 76.9% 11.0% 1.5%
Markov 6.1% 6.1%    
Emelin 1.8% 1.8%    
Pateryn 1.4% 1.4%    
Subban 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   87.5% 11.0% 1.5%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 68.3% 68.3%    
Gilbert 28.0% 13.4% 0.6% 14.0%
Beaulieu 2.7% 2.7%    
Markov 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   85.4% 0.6% 14.0%
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 98.0% 78.6% 15.6% 3.8%
Gilbert 1.1% 1.1%    
Beaulieu 0.7% 0.7%    
Markov-Pateryn 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   80.6% 15.6% 3.8%
77 Gilbert
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 79.7% 68.6% 9.8% 1.3%
Emelin 16.8% 8.0% 0.3% 8.4%
Markov 2.0% 2.0%    
Subban 1.0% 1.0%    
Beaulieu-Pateryn 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   80.1% 10.1% 9.8%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 88.2% 70.7% 14.0% 3.4%
Beaulieu 5.4% 5.4%    
Pateryn 3.6%     3.6%
Gilbert 2.0% 2.0%    
Emelin 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   79.0% 14.0% 7.0%

Back to main page