Game #60 - February 22, 2016 - Nashville 2 at Montreal 1 (SO)
Game #60 - February 22, 2016
  Nashville   2   at     Montreal   1     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
15 Fleischmann25 De la Rose41 Byron
 11:34 11:34 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 10:46 9:48 0:58 0:00 +1
27 Galchenyuk81 Eller42 Andrighetto
 9:36 8:34 1:02 0:00 E
53 Lessio17 Mitchell21 Smith-Pelly
 5:27 5:27 0:00 0:00 E
27 Galchenyuk14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 4:26 4:26 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty81 Eller42 Andrighetto
 3:05 3:05 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec67 Pacioretty
 2:44 2:44 0:00 0:00 E
15 Fleischmann81 Eller
 1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 16:22 15:22 0:00 1:00 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov76 Subban
 24:44 22:36 1:23 0:45 +1
74 Emelin28 Beaulieu
 18:06 16:51 0:00 1:15 E
45 Barberio  6 Pateryn
 10:37 10:37 0:00 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu76 Subban
 2:46 2:09 0:37 0:00 E
76 Subban
 2:13 2:13 0:00 0:00 E
45 Barberio
 2:12 2:12 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
 1:30 1:30 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:52 2:52 0:00 0:00 -1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 15TF
25JD
41PB		 67MP
14TP
11BG		 27AG
81LE
42SA		 53LL
17TM
21DS		 27AG
14TP
11BG		 67MP
81LE
42SA		 14TP
67MP		 79AM
76PS		 74AE
28NB		 45MB
6GP		 28NB
76PS		 76PS 45MB
9 Forsberg - 63 Ribeiro - 15 Smith 4:05 0:25 2:14 0:51 1:45     7:23 3:30 1:10 0:42    
18 Neal - 92 Johansen - 19 Jarnkrok 2:35 3:28 1:12 1:24   2:12   6:50 4:47 0:37      
38 Arvidsson - 12 Fisher - 33 Wilson 2:05 1:51 1:48 1:26 0:45 0:17   2:47 2:51 4:12      
51 Watson - 28 Gaustad - 20 Salomaki 1:14 1:38   1:00 1:03 0:35   2:41 0:55 2:53 0:03    
6 Weber - 59 Josi 4:10 6:59 3:44 0:59 2:54 0:01   12:04 6:57 3:46 2:02 0:06  
4 Ellis - 14 Ekholm 1:54 2:11 5:03 2:00 1:09 2:24 1:06 7:00 7:02 3:19 0:38 1:15 0:34
2 Bitetto - 8 Granberg 4:54 0:12 0:23 1:34 0:23 0:40   3:46 3:02 2:47 0:06    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Plekanec 56.8% 51.7% 5.1%  
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 23.4% 23.4%    
Eller 4.8% 4.8%    
Fleischmann-De la Rose 3.7% 3.7%    
Fleischmann-Plekanec 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 8.0% 8.0%    
Totals   94.9% 5.1%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 51.2% 46.6% 4.6%  
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 21.1% 21.1%    
Pacioretty 13.0% 13.0%    
Byron 3.6%     3.6%
Fleischmann-Gallagher 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   91.8% 4.6% 3.6%
15 Fleischmann
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Byron 65.2% 65.2%    
Eller 5.6%     5.6%
Mitchell-De la Rose 5.4% 5.4%    
De la Rose-Gallagher 3.9% 3.9%    
Eller-Byron 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 16.2% 14.7%   1.4%
Totals   93.0%   7.0%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Smith-Pelly 53.1% 53.1%    
Fleischmann-De la Rose 9.4% 9.4%    
Galchenyuk-Smith-Pelly 8.9% 8.9%    
Lessio-Andrighetto 8.8% 8.8%    
Fleischmann-Smith-Pelly 5.8% 5.8%    
Others 14.0% 14.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Smith-Pelly
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Mitchell 56.2% 56.2%    
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 9.5% 9.5%    
Pacioretty-Eller 8.4% 8.4%    
Lessio-Eller 7.6% 7.6%    
Fleischmann-Mitchell 6.2% 6.2%    
Others 12.2% 12.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Fleischmann-Byron 73.1% 73.1%    
Fleischmann-Mitchell 6.1% 6.1%    
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 5.0% 5.0%    
Fleischmann-Gallagher 4.4% 4.4%    
Fleischmann-Smith-Pelly 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 9.0% 7.4%   1.6%
Totals   98.4%   1.6%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Andrighetto 54.5% 48.7% 5.9%  
Plekanec-Gallagher 25.2% 25.2%    
Mitchell-Smith-Pelly 5.2% 5.2%    
De la Rose-Andrighetto 4.5% 4.5%    
Byron 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 7.2% 7.2%    
Totals   94.1% 5.9%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Fleischmann-De la Rose 76.0% 76.0%    
Plekanec 4.9%     4.9%
Fleischmann-Eller 4.3% 4.3%    
Galchenyuk 3.9% 3.9%    
Eller 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 8.0% 8.0%    
Totals   95.1%   4.9%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Eller 60.9% 54.3% 6.6%  
Pacioretty-Eller 19.6% 19.6%    
Lessio-Mitchell 5.7% 5.7%    
Galchenyuk-De la Rose 5.0% 5.0%    
Eller-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 5.2% 5.2%    
Totals   93.4% 6.6%  
53 Lessio
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Smith-Pelly 62.9% 62.9%    
Mitchell-Andrighetto 10.4% 10.4%    
Eller-Smith-Pelly 8.5% 8.5%    
Mitchell-Gallagher 6.2% 6.2%    
De la Rose-Byron 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 9.0% 9.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 58.3% 53.1% 5.2%  
Eller-Andrighetto 16.7% 16.7%    
Plekanec 14.8% 14.8%    
Eller-Smith-Pelly 4.4% 4.4%    
Plekanec-Smith-Pelly 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 3.8% 3.8%    
Totals   94.8% 5.2%  
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 51.2% 45.7% 5.5%  
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 16.4% 16.4%    
Fleischmann 5.3%     5.3%
Gallagher 4.9% 4.9%    
Pacioretty-Smith-Pelly 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 17.8% 17.8%    
Totals   89.2% 5.5% 5.3%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Barberio 84.3% 84.3%    
Emelin 11.9% 11.9%    
Beaulieu 3.8% 3.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 84.5% 78.7%   5.8%
Subban 12.9% 10.0% 2.9%  
Pateryn 2.3% 2.3%    
Barberio 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   91.3% 2.9% 5.8%
45 Barberio
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 75.6% 75.6%    
  15.7% 15.7%    
Subban 5.7% 5.7%    
Emelin 1.5% 1.5%    
Markov 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 88.8% 82.7%   6.1%
Pateryn 7.4% 7.4%    
Markov 2.2% 2.2%    
Barberio 1.1% 1.1%    
Subban 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   93.9%   6.1%
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 80.7% 73.8% 4.5% 2.4%
Beaulieu 9.0% 7.0% 2.0%  
  7.2% 7.2%    
Barberio 2.6% 2.6%    
Emelin 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   91.0% 6.5% 2.4%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 95.4% 87.2% 5.3% 2.9%
  2.3% 2.3%    
Emelin 1.7% 1.7%    
Barberio 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   91.8% 5.3% 2.9%
Back to main page