Game #62 - February 27, 2016 - Toronto 1 at Montreal 4
Game #62 - February 27, 2016
  Toronto   1   at     Montreal   4
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
27 Galchenyuk81 Eller42 Andrighetto
 15:42 13:13 2:29 0:00 +1
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 14:06 9:39 4:27 0:00 +2
25 De la Rose24 Danault41 Byron
 11:49 11:38 0:11 0:00 -1
17 Mitchell34 McCarron21 Smith-Pelly
 9:35 9:25 0:10 0:00 +1
17 Mitchell41 Byron
 1:19 0:00 0:00 1:19 E
Others 7:29 4:04 0:43 2:42 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov76 Subban
 23:58 16:38 6:00 1:20 +1
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
 15:01 13:33 0:00 1:28 +1
20 Bartley45 Barberio
 14:55 14:55 0:00 0:00 +1
45 Barberio  6 Pateryn
 1:39 0:11 1:28 0:00 E
45 Barberio76 Subban
 1:31 1:09 0:22 0:00 E
79 Markov45 Barberio
 1:18 0:05 0:00 1:13 E
Others 1:38 1:28 0:10 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 27AG
81LE
42SA		 67MP
14TP
11BG		 25JD
24PD
41PB		 17TM
34MM
21DS		 79AM
76PS		 74AE
6GP		 20VB
45MB
49 Leipsic - 43 Kadri - 47 Komarov 4:08 2:04 1:28 0:15 6:44 1:20 0:11
26 Winnik - 24 Holland - 40 Grabner 3:46 1:52 0:57 0:04 1:17 2:03 3:41
47 Komarov - 43 Kadri - 40 Grabner   2:06 0:26 1:00 3:11 0:57  
32 Leivo - 33 Arcobello - 38 Greening 0:10 0:20 1:41 1:38 0:03 2:21 1:33
49 Leipsic - 56 Froese - 28 Boyes 1:39 0:02 1:12 0:06 1:12 1:56  
47 Komarov - 40 Grabner 1:10 0:43 0:26 0:14 1:51 0:26  
32 Leivo - 33 Arcobello - 28 Boyes     0:18 1:29   0:14 2:15
24 Holland - 26 Winnik   2:35     1:40    
26 Winnik - 24 Holland - 38 Greening 1:32 0:02   0:49 0:39 0:07 1:44
32 Leivo - 33 Arcobello - 15 Parenteau   0:45 1:17 0:04 0:34 0:27 1:09
2 Hunwick - 44 Rielly 2:23 9:41 2:16 1:23 8:44 3:07 4:38
51 Gardiner - 52 Marincin 5:41 0:43 3:41 2:45 6:37 3:53 3:36
20 Corrado - 50 Percy 1:50 0:22 2:59 3:00 1:06 3:45 3:39
2 Hunwick - 52 Marincin 2:02 1:24 0:27   2:05 0:08 0:46
44 Rielly - 52 Marincin 1:05 1:03 0:16 0:10 1:13 0:10 0:51
51 Gardiner         0:35 1:19  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Plekanec 89.1% 61.0% 28.1%  
Pacioretty-Eller 3.6% 3.6%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 3.4% 3.4%    
De la Rose-Plekanec 1.8%   1.8%  
Galchenyuk-Plekanec 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 1.4% 1.3%   0.1%
Totals   70.0% 29.9% 0.1%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 82.3% 56.3% 26.0%  
Pacioretty 5.2% 0.2%   5.0%
Danault 3.3%     3.3%
Mitchell-Smith-Pelly 3.2% 3.2%    
De la Rose-Gallagher 1.7%   1.7%  
Others 4.4% 2.7%   1.7%
Totals   62.5% 27.6% 9.9%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
McCarron-Smith-Pelly 81.3% 79.9% 1.4%  
Byron 11.2%     11.2%
Plekanec-Smith-Pelly 4.7% 4.7%    
Danault-Byron 1.8% 1.8%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   87.4% 1.4% 11.2%
21 Smith-Pelly
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-McCarron 93.2% 91.6% 1.6%  
Mitchell-Plekanec 5.3% 5.3%    
Pacioretty-Plekanec 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   98.4% 1.6%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Byron 82.7% 81.4% 1.3%  
Plekanec 4.0%     4.0%
De la Rose-Byron-Eller 2.7% 2.7%    
Eller 2.6%     2.6%
De la Rose-Andrighetto 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 6.4% 6.3%   0.1%
Totals   92.1% 1.3% 6.7%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Byron 85.2% 83.9% 1.3%  
Eller 3.1%     3.1%
Danault-Byron-Eller 2.8% 2.8%    
Plekanec-Gallagher 2.0%   2.0%  
Danault-Andrighetto 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 5.2% 4.3%   0.8%
Totals   92.7% 3.4% 4.0%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Andrighetto 90.1% 75.9% 14.3%  
McCarron-Andrighetto 3.3% 0.9% 2.5%  
Eller-Gallagher 3.1% 3.1%    
Danault-De la Rose-Byron 1.2% 1.2%    
Danault-Andrighetto 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   83.3% 16.7%  
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Smith-Pelly 93.2% 91.6% 1.6%  
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 5.7% 1.5% 4.2%  
Danault-Byron 1.0% 1.0%    
Mitchell-Andrighetto 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   94.2% 5.8%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Danault 80.5% 79.2% 1.2%  
Mitchell 9.0%     9.0%
Danault-De la Rose-Eller 2.6% 2.6%    
Plekanec 1.9%     1.9%
Mitchell-Danault 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 4.5% 3.3%   1.2%
Totals   86.6% 1.2% 12.1%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Eller 92.5% 77.9% 14.6%  
Galchenyuk-McCarron 3.4% 0.9% 2.6%  
De la Rose-Danault 1.4% 1.4%    
De la Rose-Eller 0.9% 0.9%    
Galchenyuk-Danault 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   82.8% 17.2%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Gallagher 89.2% 61.1% 28.2%  
Plekanec 5.6% 0.2%   5.4%
Eller-Gallagher 3.6% 3.6%    
Plekanec-Smith-Pelly 0.9% 0.9%    
Eller-Andrighetto 0.5% 0.5%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   66.5% 28.2% 5.4%
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 85.8% 72.2% 13.6%  
Pacioretty-Gallagher 3.1% 3.1%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 2.9% 2.9%    
De la Rose 2.4%     2.4%
Danault-De la Rose-Byron 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 3.7% 1.3%   2.5%
Totals   81.6% 13.6% 4.8%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 85.9% 77.5%   8.4%
Barberio 9.4% 1.0% 8.4%  
Subban 3.0% 2.0% 1.0%  
Markov 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   82.3% 9.3% 8.4%
20 Bartley
Partner Total EV PP SH
Barberio 96.4% 96.4%    
Subban 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
45 Barberio
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bartley 75.9% 75.9%    
Pateryn 8.4% 0.9% 7.5%  
Subban 7.7% 5.9% 1.9%  
Markov 6.6% 0.4%   6.2%
Emelin 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   84.5% 9.3% 6.2%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 98.5% 88.9%   9.6%
Barberio 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   90.4%   9.6%
76 Subban
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 90.2% 62.6% 22.6% 5.0%
Barberio 5.7% 4.3% 1.4%  
Bartley 2.1% 2.1%    
Pateryn 1.9% 1.3% 0.6%  
Markov-Barberio 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   70.4% 24.6% 5.0%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Subban 93.6% 65.0% 23.4% 5.2%
Barberio 5.1% 0.3%   4.8%
Pateryn 1.2% 1.2%    
Barberio-Subban 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   66.6% 23.4% 10.0%
Back to main page