Game #70 - March 15, 2016 - Florida 4 at Montreal 1
Game #70 - March 15, 2016
  Florida   4   at     Montreal   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
41 Byron14 Plekanec17 Mitchell
 14:07 14:07 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty27 Galchenyuk42 Andrighetto
 12:47 12:47 0:00 0:00 -2
21 Matteau34 McCarron53 Lessio
 10:12 10:12 0:00 0:00 E
25 De la Rose24 Danault13 Brown
 7:12 7:12 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault25 De la Rose
 2:34 0:00 0:00 2:34 E
14 Plekanec67 Pacioretty
 1:32 0:48 0:00 0:44 E
25 De la Rose24 Danault53 Lessio
 1:29 1:29 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec41 Byron
 1:23 0:50 0:00 0:33 E
Others 8:44 7:37 0:00 1:07 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov45 Barberio
 20:09 17:39 0:00 2:30 +1
74 Emelin44 Dietz
 18:19 18:19 0:00 0:00 -1
20 Bartley  6 Pateryn
 11:52 11:52 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
 4:55 3:01 0:00 1:54 E
20 Bartley44 Dietz
 1:48 1:48 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:57 2:23 0:00 0:34 -2

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 41PB
14TP
17TM		 67MP
27AG
42SA		 21SM
34MM
53LL		 25JD
24PD
13MB		 24PD
25JD		 79AM
45MB		 74AE
44DD		 20VB
6GP		 74AE
6GP
11 Huberdeau - 16 Barkov - 68 Jagr 6:40 3:54   1:18 1:01 6:43 4:36 1:28 2:26
18 Smith - 21 Trocheck - 24 Hudler 1:53 4:56 3:20 1:23   3:36 4:46 3:24  
26 Purcell - 27 Bjugstad - 48 Shaw 3:29 1:55 2:49 1:58 0:25 3:28 3:50 2:21 1:09
22 Thornton - 41 McKegg - 28 Wilson 0:27 0:44 1:43 1:52   1:18 0:43 2:49 0:13
5 Ekblad - 7 Kulikov 4:24 2:58 2:01 3:46 1:36 5:05 6:30 4:17 3:19
6 Petrovic - 51 Campbell 7:30 5:36 3:33 0:51   7:19 7:21 3:34 0:09
3 Kampfer - 46 Kindl 2:01 2:21 4:23 1:53   3:46 3:42 3:27 0:44

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Brown
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Danault 82.8% 82.8%    
Byron-Plekanec 8.0% 8.0%    
Lessio-Danault 5.0% 5.0%    
Byron-Danault 1.9% 1.9%    
De la Rose-McCarron 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Mitchell 77.1% 77.1%    
Pacioretty 8.4% 4.4%   4.0%
Byron 7.6% 4.5%   3.0%
Byron-Brown 3.8% 3.8%    
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 2.0% 0.8%   1.2%
Totals   91.8%   8.2%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Plekanec 85.2% 85.2%    
Byron 4.6%     4.6%
Andrighetto 4.2% 4.2%    
Danault 2.0% 2.0%    
Byron-Danault 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 2.9% 2.1%   0.8%
Totals   94.6%   5.4%
21 Matteau
Linemates Total EV PP SH
McCarron-Lessio 90.4% 90.4%    
De la Rose-Lessio 5.5% 5.5%    
Danault-Lessio 1.8% 1.8%    
McCarron-Andrighetto 1.2% 1.2%    
McCarron-Mitchell 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Brown 54.3% 54.3%    
De la Rose 19.4%     19.4%
De la Rose-Lessio 11.2% 11.2%    
Lessio-Brown 3.3% 3.3%    
De la Rose-Andrighetto 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 9.1% 9.1%    
Totals   80.6%   19.4%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Brown 54.3% 54.3%    
Danault 19.3%     19.3%
Danault-Lessio 11.2% 11.2%    
Matteau-Lessio 4.6% 4.6%    
Danault-Andrighetto 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 7.8% 5.2%   2.6%
Totals   78.0%   22.0%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 85.9% 85.9%    
Pacioretty 6.2% 6.2%    
De la Rose-Andrighetto 1.9% 1.9%    
Pacioretty-McCarron 1.8% 1.8%    
Pacioretty-Byron 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 2.6% 2.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Matteau-Lessio 91.8% 91.8%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 2.4% 2.4%    
Matteau-Andrighetto 1.2% 1.2%    
De la Rose-Lessio 1.0% 1.0%    
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Mitchell 78.0% 78.0%    
Plekanec 7.6% 4.6%   3.0%
Mitchell 4.2%     4.2%
Plekanec-Brown 3.9% 3.9%    
Andrighetto 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   92.7%   7.3%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 82.6% 82.6%    
Mitchell 4.5% 4.5%    
Byron 3.1% 3.1%    
De la Rose-Danault 2.4% 2.4%    
Pacioretty-Danault 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.3% 5.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
53 Lessio
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Matteau-McCarron 77.5% 77.5%    
De la Rose-Danault 11.3% 11.3%    
Matteau-De la Rose 4.7% 4.7%    
Danault-Brown 3.3% 3.3%    
Matteau-Danault 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 76.2% 76.2%    
Plekanec 9.1% 4.8%   4.4%
Galchenyuk 5.5% 5.5%    
Danault-Andrighetto 2.0% 2.0%    
McCarron-Galchenyuk 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 5.6% 5.6%    
Totals   95.6%   4.4%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Bartley 67.4% 67.4%    
Emelin 27.9% 17.1%   10.8%
Markov 4.7% 1.8%   2.9%
Totals   86.3%   13.7%
20 Bartley
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 84.2% 84.2%    
Dietz 12.8% 12.8%    
Emelin 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
44 Dietz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 87.2% 87.2%    
Bartley 8.6% 8.6%    
Barberio 3.4% 3.4%    
Markov-Barberio 0.6% 0.6%    
Markov 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
45 Barberio
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 95.0% 83.3%   11.8%
Dietz 3.4% 3.4%    
Emelin 0.9% 0.9%    
Markov-Dietz 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   88.2%   11.8%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dietz 74.9% 74.9%    
Pateryn 20.1% 12.3%   7.8%
Markov 2.5% 2.2%   0.2%
Bartley 1.8% 1.8%    
Barberio 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   92.0%   8.0%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Barberio 92.6% 81.1%   11.5%
Pateryn 3.8% 1.5%   2.4%
Emelin 2.8% 2.5%   0.2%
Barberio-Dietz 0.6% 0.6%    
Dietz 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   85.9%   14.1%
Back to main page