Game #74 - March 22, 2016 - Anaheim 3 at Montreal 4
Game #74 - March 22, 2016
  Anaheim   3   at     Montreal   4
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
81 Eller14 Plekanec17 Mitchell
 15:35 15:35 0:00 0:00 +1
67 Pacioretty27 Galchenyuk41 Byron
 14:41 14:41 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Matteau24 Danault34 McCarron
 10:23 9:44 0:39 0:00 E
53 Lessio25 De la Rose13 Brown
 6:41 6:30 0:11 0:00 +1
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec27 Galchenyuk
 1:04 0:00 1:04 0:00 E
Others 11:36 7:30 0:06 4:00 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
79 Markov74 Emelin
 25:06 22:49 0:00 2:17 E
28 Beaulieu  6 Pateryn
 17:15 15:53 0:00 1:22 -2
71 Hanley44 Dietz
 11:30 11:24 0:00 0:06 +1
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
 2:21 1:58 0:23 0:00 +1
79 Markov28 Beaulieu
 1:45 0:08 1:37 0:00 E
Others 2:03 1:48 0:00 0:15 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 81LE
14TP
17TM		 67MP
27AG
41PB		 21SM
24PD
34MM		 53LL
25JD
13MB		 79AM
74AE		 28NB
6GP		 71JH
44DD		 74AE
6GP
7 Cogliano - 17 Kesler - 33 Silfverberg 1:24 6:00 4:06 0:14 5:25 5:54 0:39 0:04
11 Pirri - 15 Getzlaf - 10 Perry 4:55 2:35 2:33 0:12 5:41 4:57 0:24 0:16
88 McGinn - 67 Rakell - 25 Santorelli 2:03 1:20   2:16 1:08 0:54 3:37 0:39
37 Ritchie - 22 Horcoff - 16 Garbutt 1:48 1:14 0:32 0:40 1:27 0:11 4:00  
88 McGinn - 15 Getzlaf - 10 Perry 1:49     0:09 2:00 0:01 0:01  
42 Manson - 47 Lindholm 4:55 3:43 2:16 2:21 5:23 4:52 2:06 0:48
4 Fowler - 24 Despres 3:43 1:04 1:57 0:33 3:14 3:55 0:39  
2 Bieksa - 24 Despres 1:05 2:27 1:29 2:11 2:17 1:17 4:03 0:31
4 Fowler - 5 Holzer 2:00 1:28 2:32 0:24 3:08 2:59 1:02 0:44
2 Bieksa - 5 Holzer 2:10 1:24 1:36 0:15 2:46 1:47 0:59 0:01
2 Bieksa - 47 Lindholm   2:21     1:48 1:44 1:14  
4 Fowler - 47 Lindholm 1:29 0:57 0:05 0:09 2:17 0:10 0:02  
2 Bieksa - 4 Fowler 0:04 0:49 0:17 0:17 1:38 0:10 0:15  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Brown
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-De la Rose 86.8% 84.4% 2.4%  
McCarron-Danault 5.4% 5.4%    
Mitchell-De la Rose 2.4% 2.4%    
Lessio-Plekanec 1.7% 1.7%    
Eller-Plekanec 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   97.6% 2.4%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Mitchell 76.7% 76.7%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 5.3%   5.3%  
Byron 4.4%     4.4%
Eller 2.6%     2.6%
Pacioretty 2.4%     2.4%
Others 8.6% 5.8% 0.5% 2.3%
Totals   82.5% 5.7% 11.7%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Eller-Plekanec 78.8% 78.8%    
Byron-Galchenyuk 4.2% 4.2%    
Lessio-De la Rose 2.6% 2.6%    
Eller-Galchenyuk 2.6% 2.6%    
Eller-McCarron 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 9.3% 6.1%   3.2%
Totals   96.8%   3.2%
21 Matteau
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-McCarron 81.4% 76.3% 5.1%  
Danault-De la Rose 5.5% 5.5%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 3.7% 3.7%    
Plekanec-Danault 3.0% 3.0%    
Pacioretty-McCarron 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 4.1% 3.3% 0.8%  
Totals   94.1% 5.9%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Matteau-McCarron 75.6% 70.9% 4.7%  
Matteau-De la Rose 5.1% 5.1%    
Plekanec 3.4%     3.4%
McCarron-Mitchell 3.0% 3.0%    
McCarron-Brown 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 9.8% 6.9%   2.9%
Totals   89.0% 4.7% 6.3%
25 De la Rose
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lessio-Brown 68.8% 66.9% 1.9%  
Matteau-Danault 7.2% 7.2%    
Lessio-Mitchell 5.3% 5.3%    
Pacioretty 5.0%     5.0%
Danault 4.1%     4.1%
Others 9.6% 9.6%    
Totals   89.0% 1.9% 9.1%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Byron 79.4% 79.4%    
Pacioretty-Plekanec 5.8%   5.8%  
Byron-Mitchell 4.5% 4.5%    
Eller-Mitchell 2.8% 2.8%    
Pacioretty-Matteau 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 5.0% 3.9% 0.5% 0.5%
Totals   93.1% 6.3% 0.5%
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Matteau-Danault 84.4% 79.1% 5.3%  
Eller-Mitchell 4.1% 4.1%    
Danault-Mitchell 3.4% 3.4%    
Danault-Brown 3.4% 3.4%    
Pacioretty-Matteau 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   94.7% 5.3%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 84.5% 84.5%    
Plekanec 5.2%     5.2%
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 4.8% 4.8%    
Eller-Plekanec 1.2% 1.2%    
Eller-Galchenyuk 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 3.1% 1.6%   1.4%
Totals   93.4%   6.6%
53 Lessio
Linemates Total EV PP SH
De la Rose-Brown 87.9% 85.5% 2.4%  
De la Rose-Mitchell 6.8% 6.8%    
De la Rose-Byron 2.2% 2.2%    
Plekanec-Brown 1.8% 1.8%    
Matteau-McCarron 0.9% 0.9%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   97.6% 2.4%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Byron 82.4% 82.4%    
Plekanec-Galchenyuk 6.0%   6.0%  
Plekanec 2.7%     2.7%
De la Rose 2.7%     2.7%
Galchenyuk-Matteau 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   88.6% 6.0% 5.4%
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Mitchell 83.6% 83.6%    
Plekanec 2.9%     2.9%
Galchenyuk-Mitchell 2.8% 2.8%    
McCarron-Mitchell 2.7% 2.7%    
Mitchell 2.6%     2.6%
Others 5.5% 5.5%    
Totals   94.5%   5.5%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 85.5% 78.8%   6.8%
Emelin 11.7% 9.8% 1.9%  
Markov 1.9% 0.7%   1.2%
Dietz 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   90.1% 1.9% 8.0%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 89.0% 81.9%   7.1%
Markov 9.0% 0.7% 8.3%  
Emelin 1.5% 1.5%    
Dietz 0.3% 0.3%    
Hanley 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   84.6% 8.3% 7.1%
44 Dietz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hanley 95.2% 94.3%   0.8%
Emelin 2.8% 2.8%    
Pateryn 1.5% 1.5%    
Beaulieu 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   99.2%   0.8%
71 Hanley
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dietz 93.6% 92.8%   0.8%
Emelin 6.2% 6.2%    
Beaulieu 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   99.2%   0.8%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 87.0% 79.1%   7.9%
Pateryn 8.1% 6.8% 1.3%  
Hanley 2.7% 2.7%    
Dietz 1.2% 1.2%    
Beaulieu 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   90.8% 1.3% 7.9%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 92.2% 83.8%   8.4%
Beaulieu 6.4% 0.5% 5.9%  
Pateryn 1.4% 0.5%   0.9%
Totals   84.8% 5.9% 9.3%
Back to main page