Game #81 - April 7, 2016 - Montreal 4 at Carolina 2
Game #81 - April 7, 2016
  Montreal   4   at     Carolina   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty27 Galchenyuk11 Gallagher
 14:05 14:05 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault51 Desharnais42 Andrighetto
 13:40 13:40 0:00 0:00 E
43 Carr14 Plekanec81 Eller
 13:04 13:04 0:00 0:00 +2
41 Byron17 Mitchell13 Brown
 9:47 9:47 0:00 0:00 -1
Others 9:24 7:24 0:00 2:00 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
74 Emelin89 Johnston
 19:06 19:06 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov  6 Pateryn
 18:55 18:55 0:00 0:00 +1
71 Hanley44 Dietz
 14:42 14:00 0:00 0:42 +1
74 Emelin  6 Pateryn
 3:44 2:26 0:00 1:18 E
79 Markov44 Dietz
 1:18 1:18 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:15 2:15 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
27AG
11BG		 24PD
51DD
42SA		 43DC
14TP
81LE		 41PB
17TM
13MB		 74AE
89RJ		 79AM
6GP		 71JH
44DD		 74AE
6GP
20 Nash - 49 Rask - 53 Skinner 2:21 3:03 2:09 3:02 5:58 2:53 3:05  
14 Gerbe - 18 McClement - 24 Malone 1:13 2:01 0:58 1:13 1:40 3:35 0:48  
36 Brown - 11 Staal - 42 Nordstrom 2:28 0:57 0:51 0:43 1:59 2:10 0:45 0:03
33 Ryan - 11 Staal - 42 Nordstrom 1:25 2:04 1:19 0:06 1:30 2:27 0:48  
25 Terry - 16 Lindholm - 36 Brown 1:23 0:17 1:42 0:48 0:48 1:08 2:32  
5 Hanifin - 54 Pesce 2:44 3:51 6:25 4:18 6:25 7:21 3:36 0:57
27 Faulk - 74 Slavin 8:53 2:33 1:23 1:11 4:36 7:06 4:29 0:10
7 Murphy - 65 Hainsey 1:18 6:46 4:40 3:38 6:31 3:56 5:22 0:34
5 Hanifin - 27 Faulk 0:42           0:36 1:37

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 89.5% 89.5%    
Pacioretty-Mitchell 4.8% 4.8%    
Byron-Galchenyuk 1.6% 1.6%    
Carr-Galchenyuk 1.2% 1.2%    
Pacioretty-Desharnais 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
13 Brown
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Mitchell 87.1% 87.1%    
Byron-Desharnais 5.9% 5.9%    
Danault-Desharnais 3.1% 3.1%    
Byron-Galchenyuk 2.1% 2.1%    
Byron-Plekanec 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Eller 84.7% 84.7%    
Pacioretty 4.5%     4.5%
Pacioretty-Eller 3.1% 3.1%    
Eller-Mitchell 2.6% 2.6%    
Carr-Andrighetto 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   95.5%   4.5%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Brown 80.3% 80.3%    
Pacioretty-Gallagher 6.2% 6.2%    
Byron 6.0%     6.0%
Eller-Plekanec 3.3% 3.3%    
Desharnais-Danault 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   94.0%   6.0%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Desharnais-Andrighetto 92.2% 92.2%    
Eller 2.6%     2.6%
Desharnais-Brown 2.4% 2.4%    
Desharnais-Mitchell 2.2% 2.2%    
Galchenyuk-Andrighetto 0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   97.4%   2.6%
27 Galchenyuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Gallagher 84.6% 84.6%    
Pacioretty-Eller 4.2% 4.2%    
Pacioretty 3.4% 2.3%   1.1%
Pacioretty-Andrighetto 2.3% 2.3%    
Byron-Gallagher 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   98.9%   1.1%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Brown 81.1% 81.1%    
Mitchell 6.1%     6.1%
Desharnais-Brown 5.5% 5.5%    
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 2.1% 2.1%    
Galchenyuk-Brown 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   93.9%   6.1%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Desharnais 90.9% 90.9%    
Carr-Desharnais 3.7% 3.7%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 2.5% 2.5%    
Carr-Plekanec 2.0% 2.0%    
Danault-Galchenyuk 0.4% 0.4%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Eller 88.9% 88.9%    
Desharnais-Andrighetto 3.7% 3.7%    
Plekanec-Andrighetto 2.0% 2.0%    
Desharnais-Eller 1.9% 1.9%    
Galchenyuk-Eller 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
51 Desharnais
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Andrighetto 85.0% 85.0%    
Byron-Brown 4.1% 4.1%    
Carr-Andrighetto 3.4% 3.4%    
Danault-Brown 2.2% 2.2%    
Mitchell-Danault 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Galchenyuk-Gallagher 78.2% 78.2%    
Mitchell-Gallagher 4.2% 4.2%    
Plekanec 3.9%     3.9%
Galchenyuk-Eller 3.9% 3.9%    
Galchenyuk 3.1% 2.1%   1.0%
Others 6.8% 6.8%    
Totals   95.1%   4.9%
81 Eller
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Plekanec 83.4% 83.4%    
Pacioretty-Galchenyuk 4.5% 4.5%    
Pacioretty-Plekanec 3.1% 3.1%    
Mitchell-Plekanec 2.6% 2.6%    
Danault 2.4%     2.4%
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   97.6%   2.4%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Pateryn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 79.4% 79.4%    
Emelin 15.7% 10.2%   5.5%
Dietz 3.3% 3.3%    
Markov-Emelin 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   94.5%   5.5%
44 Dietz
Partner Total EV PP SH
Hanley 85.1% 81.1%   4.1%
Markov 7.5% 7.5%    
Pateryn 4.5% 4.5%    
Johnston 2.7% 2.7%    
Emelin 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   95.9%   4.1%
71 Hanley
Partner Total EV PP SH
Dietz 96.1% 91.5%   4.6%
Emelin 3.9% 3.9%    
Totals   95.4%   4.6%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Johnston 80.1% 80.1%    
Pateryn 15.7% 10.2%   5.5%
Hanley 2.5% 2.5%    
Markov-Pateryn 1.6% 1.6%    
Dietz 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   94.5%   5.5%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Pateryn 91.8% 91.8%    
Dietz 6.3% 6.3%    
Emelin-Pateryn 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
89 Johnston
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 97.6% 97.6%    
Dietz 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page