Game #27 - December 8, 2016 - New Jersey 2 at Montreal 5
Game #27 - December 8, 2016
  New Jersey   2   at     Montreal   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec47 Radulov
 15:51 15:51 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen24 Danault65 Shaw
 12:50 12:50 0:00 0:00 +1
41 Byron17 Mitchell11 Gallagher
 9:52 9:52 0:00 0:00 +2
43 Carr32 Flynn42 Andrighetto
 6:52 6:52 0:00 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty65 Shaw47 Radulov
 2:25 0:18 2:07 0:00 E
14 Plekanec41 Byron
 1:00 0:00 0:00 1:00 E
Others 11:10 8:32 0:35 2:03 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
74 Emelin  6 Weber
 19:20 17:05 0:00 2:15 E
79 Markov26 Petry
 18:02 17:21 0:03 0:38 +1
28 Beaulieu20 Redmond
 15:25 15:25 0:00 0:00 +2
79 Markov  6 Weber
 3:06 0:59 2:07 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu26 Petry
 1:20 0:56 0:24 0:00 E
79 Markov74 Emelin
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:39 1:21 0:08 0:10 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
14TP
47AR		 62AL
24PD
65AS		 41PB
17TM
11BG		 43DC
32BF
42SA		 67MP
65AS
47AR		 74AE
6SW		 79AM
26JP		 28NB
20ZR		 79AM
6SW
13 Cammalleri - 19 Zajac - 21 Palmieri 3:56 2:35 1:53 0:30   6:24 3:37 0:24  
44 Wood - 38 Fiddler - 36 Lappin 5:11 1:12 0:24 1:42   0:32 1:49 6:48  
9 Hall - 14 Henrique - 11 Parenteau 1:52 2:56 3:29 0:28   2:34 5:49 0:21  
8 Bennett - 51 Kalinin - 25 Smith-Pelly 1:22 1:56 1:46 0:55   2:48 0:26 3:25  
13 Cammalleri - 19 Zajac - 25 Smith-Pelly 0:40   0:53 0:52   1:45 0:49    
2 Moore - 22 Quincey 7:01 1:14 3:06 1:24 0:49 5:56 3:11 4:44 0:57
6 Greene - 28 Severson 4:20 4:56 2:27 1:12   4:37 6:21 2:54  
12 Lovejoy - 33 Auvitu 2:31 4:02 2:31 1:39   3:12 5:04 4:17  
6 Greene - 12 Lovejoy 0:28 0:53     1:36   1:01 0:34 2:02
2 Moore - 28 Severson 0:07 0:35 0:10 0:21   1:18 0:45 0:09 0:07

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Mitchell 78.6% 78.6%    
Mitchell 6.0% 6.0%    
Lehkonen-Plekanec 4.6% 1.5% 3.2%  
Carr-Mitchell 4.0% 4.0%    
Carr-Flynn 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 3.5% 3.5%    
Totals   96.8% 3.2%  
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Radulov 83.2% 83.2%    
Byron 5.2%     5.2%
Lehkonen-Radulov 3.1% 2.9% 0.3%  
Lehkonen-Gallagher 3.1% 1.0% 2.1%  
Byron-Radulov 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.4% 2.4%   1.0%
Totals   91.4% 2.4% 6.2%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Gallagher 72.7% 72.7%    
Byron 6.6%     6.6%
Gallagher 5.5% 5.5%    
Carr-Andrighetto 4.3% 4.3%    
Carr-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 7.1% 7.1%    
Totals   93.4%   6.6%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Shaw 83.3% 83.3%    
Flynn 4.0%     4.0%
Carr-Andrighetto 2.6% 2.6%    
Pacioretty-Shaw 2.3% 2.3%    
Byron-Mitchell 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 5.5% 5.5%    
Totals   96.0%   4.0%
32 Flynn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Andrighetto 69.7% 69.7%    
Danault 6.3%     6.3%
Carr-Gallagher 4.2% 4.2%    
Byron-Gallagher 4.1% 4.1%    
Byron 3.6%     3.6%
Others 12.2% 12.2%    
Totals   90.2%   9.8%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Gallagher 70.1% 70.1%    
Plekanec 7.1%     7.1%
Mitchell 6.4%     6.4%
Flynn-Gallagher 2.8% 2.8%    
Plekanec-Radulov 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 10.9% 8.4%   2.5%
Totals   84.0%   16.0%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Carr-Flynn 81.3% 81.3%    
Carr-Mitchell 6.9% 6.9%    
Carr-Danault 4.7% 4.7%    
Lehkonen-Danault 3.4% 3.4%    
Flynn-Shaw 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Flynn-Andrighetto 70.2% 70.2%    
Mitchell-Andrighetto 6.0% 6.0%    
Mitchell-Gallagher 5.1% 5.1%    
Flynn-Gallagher 4.3% 4.3%    
Danault-Andrighetto 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 10.4% 10.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
47 Radulov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Plekanec 77.5% 77.5%    
Pacioretty-Shaw 11.8% 1.5% 10.4%  
Lehkonen-Plekanec 2.9% 2.7% 0.2%  
Byron-Plekanec 1.8% 1.8%    
Carr-Flynn 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   89.4% 10.6%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Shaw 88.5% 88.5%    
Plekanec-Radulov 4.1% 3.8% 0.3%  
Plekanec-Gallagher 4.0% 1.3% 2.8%  
Danault-Andrighetto 2.0% 2.0%    
Flynn-Shaw 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   96.9% 3.1%  
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Danault 72.6% 72.6%    
Pacioretty-Radulov 13.7% 1.7% 12.0%  
Pacioretty 3.9% 3.1% 0.8%  
Pacioretty-Danault 2.0% 2.0%    
Carr-Flynn 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 6.0% 6.0%    
Totals   87.3% 12.7%  
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-Radulov 78.6% 78.6%    
Shaw-Radulov 12.0% 1.5% 10.5%  
Shaw 3.4% 2.7% 0.7%  
Danault-Shaw 1.7% 1.7%    
Flynn-Radulov 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 3.2% 2.3%   0.9%
Totals   87.9% 11.2% 0.9%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 83.8% 74.0%   9.7%
Markov 13.4% 4.3% 9.2%  
Petry 1.5% 0.8%   0.7%
Beaulieu 0.7% 0.7%    
Markov-Redmond 0.6%   0.6%  
Totals   79.8% 9.7% 10.5%
20 Redmond
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 99.1% 99.1%    
Markov-Weber 0.9%   0.9%  
Totals   99.1% 0.9%  
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 89.9% 86.5% 0.2% 3.2%
Beaulieu 6.6% 4.7% 2.0%  
Emelin 1.7% 1.7%    
Weber 1.7% 0.9%   0.8%
Totals   93.8% 2.2% 4.0%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Redmond 87.8% 87.8%    
Petry 7.6% 5.3% 2.3%  
Emelin 2.3% 2.3%    
Markov 1.4% 1.4%    
Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   97.7% 2.3%  
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 91.1% 80.5%   10.6%
Markov 5.3% 5.3%    
Beaulieu 1.9% 1.9%    
Petry 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   89.4%   10.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 79.6% 76.6% 0.2% 2.8%
Weber 13.7% 4.3% 9.3%  
Emelin 5.0% 5.0%    
Beaulieu 1.1% 1.1%    
Redmond-Weber 0.6%   0.6%  
Totals   87.0% 10.2% 2.8%
Back to main page