Game #30 - December 16, 2016 - San Jose 4 at Montreal 2
Game #30 - December 16, 2016
  San Jose   4   at     Montreal   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
67 Pacioretty24 Danault47 Radulov
 7:57 7:10 0:47 0:00 E
41 Byron17 Mitchell11 Gallagher
 7:36 7:34 0:00 0:02 E
67 Pacioretty17 Mitchell47 Radulov
 2:48 2:05 0:43 0:00 E
67 Pacioretty14 Plekanec47 Radulov
 2:42 2:20 0:22 0:00 E
41 Byron14 Plekanec11 Gallagher
 2:25 0:39 1:46 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen14 Plekanec34 McCarron
 2:24 2:24 0:00 0:00 -1
43 Carr24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:18 2:18 0:00 0:00 -1
14 Plekanec67 Pacioretty
 2:09 0:21 0:00 1:48 E
62 Lehkonen24 Danault47 Radulov
 2:07 2:07 0:00 0:00 E
14 Plekanec32 Flynn
 1:57 0:00 0:00 1:57 E
24 Danault32 Flynn
 1:57 0:00 0:00 1:57 E
62 Lehkonen14 Plekanec32 Flynn
 1:57 1:57 0:00 0:00 +1
43 Carr34 McCarron41 Byron
 1:38 1:38 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen34 McCarron47 Radulov
 1:28 0:06 1:22 0:00 E
24 Danault41 Byron
 1:14 0:00 0:00 1:14 E
11 Gallagher - 17 Mitchell - 34 McCarron - 41 Byron 1:09 1:09 0:00 0:00 E
17 Mitchell41 Byron
 1:03 0:00 0:00 1:03 E
Others 15:11 13:28 1:00 0:43 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
74 Emelin  6 Weber
 18:58 15:14 0:00 3:44 E
79 Markov26 Petry
 13:11 10:39 0:20 2:12 E
28 Beaulieu20 Redmond
 9:05 9:05 0:00 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu79 Markov
 3:53 1:00 1:58 0:55 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 3:39 0:00 3:39 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu26 Petry
 3:32 3:32 0:00 0:00 E
79 Markov  6 Weber
 2:00 2:00 0:00 0:00 E
74 Emelin20 Redmond
 1:22 1:22 0:00 0:00 E
28 Beaulieu74 Emelin
 1:12 0:25 0:00 0:47 E
74 Emelin26 Petry
 1:12 0:07 0:00 1:05 E
Others 1:56 1:52 0:03 0:01 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 67MP
24PD
47AR		 41PB
17TM
11BG		 67MP
17TM
47AR		 67MP
14TP
47AR		 41PB
14TP
11BG		 62AL
14TP
34MM		 43DC
24PD
62AL		 14TP
67MP		 62AL
24PD
47AR		 74AE
6SW		 79AM
26JP		 28NB
20ZR		 28NB
79AM		 26JP
6SW		 28NB
26JP		 79AM
6SW
8 Pavelski - 19 Thornton - 12 Marleau 3:04 1:42 1:20 0:10   0:14 0:47     7:19 2:19   0:02   0:17 0:20
89 Boedker - 39 Couture - 62 Labanc 1:12 3:30   0:36 0:35 0:18 0:01   0:47 2:50 3:08 1:31 0:23   1:16 0:06
27 Donskoi - 50 Tierney - 28 Meier 0:31 1:15 0:22 1:17   0:46 0:40   0:57 2:00 2:15 3:23     0:06  
38 Haley - 57 Wingels - 68 Karlsson 0:53 0:35       0:41 0:40     1:15 1:34 3:15 0:27      
8 Pavelski - 12 Marleau - 19 Thornton - 39 Couture               1:50   3:06 1:49   0:03      
50 Tierney - 68 Karlsson 0:16   0:28 0:20 0:44           0:16   1:19 1:02    
89 Boedker - 27 Donskoi - 62 Labanc                   0:28 0:17 0:12 0:52      
44 Vlasic - 61 Braun 2:16 2:03 0:21 1:55 0:59 0:58 0:42   1:18 7:34 3:09 1:49 1:09 1:30 2:13 0:08
7 Martin - 88 Burns 3:27 3:15 0:29 0:47 0:34 0:27 1:12   0:32 4:10 2:50 2:25 0:05 1:04 0:14 1:38
4 Dillon - 5 Schlemko 1:23 1:59 0:53   0:15 0:54 0:09   0:09 2:30 3:43 3:38     0:25  
88 Burns               2:09   3:14 1:49   0:03      
5 Schlemko - 44 Vlasic     0:14       0:05     0:44 0:26 0:20 0:52      
4 Dillon - 88 Burns     0:38           0:08   0:15   0:41 0:27    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Mitchell 49.0% 48.8%   0.2%
Byron-Plekanec 15.6% 4.2% 11.4%  
Mitchell-McCarron-Byron 7.4% 7.4%    
Carr-McCarron 5.4% 5.4%    
Radulov-Byron 4.5%   4.5%  
Others 18.2% 17.7% 0.4%  
Totals   83.5% 16.3% 0.2%
14 Plekanec
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Radulov 15.8% 13.6% 2.1%  
Byron-Gallagher 14.1% 3.8% 10.3%  
Lehkonen-McCarron 14.0% 14.0%    
Pacioretty 12.5% 2.0%   10.5%
Flynn 11.4%     11.4%
Others 32.2% 31.6%   0.6%
Totals   65.1% 12.5% 22.5%
17 Mitchell
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Gallagher 52.0% 51.8%   0.2%
Pacioretty-Radulov 19.2% 14.3% 4.9%  
Gallagher-McCarron-Byron 7.9% 7.9%    
Byron 7.2%     7.2%
Carr-Flynn 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 9.5% 6.7% 0.6% 2.2%
Totals   84.9% 5.5% 9.6%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Radulov 42.7% 38.5% 4.2%  
Carr-Lehkonen 12.3% 12.3%    
Lehkonen-Radulov 11.4% 11.4%    
Flynn 10.5%     10.5%
Byron 6.6%     6.6%
Others 16.5% 15.5%   1.1%
Totals   77.6% 4.2% 18.2%
32 Flynn
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Plekanec 15.5% 15.5%    
Danault 15.5%     15.5%
Plekanec 15.5%     15.5%
Plekanec-McCarron 6.9% 6.9%    
Carr-McCarron 6.1% 6.1%    
Others 40.7% 37.6% 1.2% 1.8%
Totals   66.1% 1.2% 32.8%
34 McCarron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Plekanec 19.3% 19.3%    
Carr-Byron 13.2% 13.2%    
Lehkonen-Radulov 11.8% 0.8% 11.0%  
Gallagher-Mitchell-Byron 9.3% 9.3%    
Flynn-Plekanec 7.0% 7.0%    
Others 39.5% 37.6% 1.9%  
Totals   87.1% 12.9%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Mitchell-Gallagher 39.4% 39.2%   0.2%
Plekanec-Gallagher 12.5% 3.4% 9.2%  
Carr-McCarron 8.5% 8.5%    
Danault 6.4%     6.4%
Gallagher-Mitchell-McCarron 6.0% 6.0%    
Others 27.2% 18.2% 3.6% 5.4%
Totals   75.2% 12.8% 12.0%
42 Andrighetto
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-McCarron 52.4% 52.4%    
McCarron-Flynn 41.5% 41.5%    
Byron-Danault 6.1% 6.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Carr
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Lehkonen 22.3% 22.3%    
McCarron-Byron 15.8% 15.8%    
Plekanec-Lehkonen 9.5% 9.5%    
McCarron-Gallagher 8.1% 8.1%    
McCarron-Flynn 7.4% 7.4%    
Others 36.8% 36.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
47 Radulov
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Pacioretty-Danault 38.4% 34.6% 3.8%  
Pacioretty-Mitchell 13.5% 10.1% 3.5%  
Pacioretty-Plekanec 13.0% 11.3% 1.8%  
Lehkonen-Danault 10.2% 10.2%    
Lehkonen-McCarron 7.1% 0.5% 6.6%  
Others 17.7% 14.0% 3.7%  
Totals   80.7% 19.3%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Plekanec-McCarron 18.4% 18.4%    
Carr-Danault 17.6% 17.6%    
Danault-Radulov 16.2% 16.2%    
Plekanec-Flynn 15.0% 15.0%    
McCarron-Radulov 11.3% 0.8% 10.5%  
Others 21.5% 19.3%   2.2%
Totals   87.3% 10.5% 2.2%
67 Pacioretty
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Radulov 43.0% 38.8% 4.2%  
Mitchell-Radulov 15.1% 11.3% 3.9%  
Plekanec-Radulov 14.6% 12.6% 2.0%  
Plekanec 11.6% 1.9%   9.7%
Gallagher-Flynn-Byron-Radulov 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 12.5% 9.3% 1.6% 1.6%
Totals   76.9% 11.7% 11.4%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Emelin 71.6% 57.5%   14.1%
Petry 13.8%   13.8%  
Markov 7.6% 7.6%    
Redmond 2.8% 2.8%    
  2.1% 2.1%    
Others 2.1% 1.9% 0.2%  
Totals   71.9% 14.0% 14.1%
20 Redmond
Partner Total EV PP SH
Beaulieu 81.1% 81.1%    
Emelin 12.2% 12.2%    
Weber 6.7% 6.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Markov 60.7% 49.0% 1.5% 10.1%
Weber 16.8%   16.8%  
Beaulieu 16.3% 16.3%    
Emelin 5.5% 0.5%   5.0%
Markov-Weber 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   66.5% 18.3% 15.1%
28 Beaulieu
Partner Total EV PP SH
Redmond 50.2% 50.2%    
Markov 21.5% 5.5% 10.9% 5.1%
Petry 19.5% 19.5%    
Emelin 6.6% 2.3%   4.3%
Markov-Weber 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 0.3%   0.3%  
Totals   79.5% 11.1% 9.4%
74 Emelin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 83.2% 66.8%   16.4%
Redmond 6.0% 6.0%    
Beaulieu 5.3% 1.8%   3.4%
Petry 5.3% 0.5%   4.8%
Markov 0.3% 0.2%   0.1%
Totals   75.4%   24.6%
79 Markov
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 67.1% 54.2% 1.7% 11.2%
Beaulieu 19.8% 5.1% 10.0% 4.7%
Weber 10.2% 10.2%    
Beaulieu-Weber 1.8% 1.8%    
Petry-Weber 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%   0.1%
Totals   72.3% 11.7% 16.0%
Back to main page