Game #26 - December 1, 2018 - N.Y. Rangers 2 at Montreal 5
Game #26 - December 1, 2018
  N.Y. Rangers   2   at     Montreal   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin13 Domi65 Shaw
 13:32 13:32 0:00 0:00 +1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 11:02 11:02 0:00 0:00 +1
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi62 Lehkonen
 10:14 10:14 0:00 0:00 +1
47 Agostino43 Chaput20 Deslauriers
 8:39 8:39 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 13 Domi - 15 Kotkaniemi - 92 Drouin 2:01 0:00 2:01 0:00 E
13 Domi24 Danault
 1:09 0:00 0:00 1:09 E
Others 13:23 10:25 1:29 1:29 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak  6 Weber
 18:49 18:43 0:04 0:02 +2
21 Schlemko26 Petry
 16:09 15:02 1:07 0:00 E
28 Reilly  8 Benn
 14:56 14:56 0:00 0:00 +2
  6 Weber
 2:19 0:00 2:19 0:00 E
21 Schlemko  6 Weber
 1:48 0:00 0:00 1:48 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
 1:40 0:52 0:00 0:48 E
21 Schlemko28 Reilly
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:17 3:17 0:00 0:00 -1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
13MD
65AS		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 41PB
15JK
62AL		 47KA
43MC
20ND		 11BG
13MD
15JK
92JD		 17BK
6SW		 21DS
26JP		 28MR
8JB		 6SW
26 Vesey - 93 Zibanejad - 17 Fast 1:38 7:42 0:26 1:18   9:58 2:22 0:06  
16 Strome - 21 Howden - 50 Andersson 1:10 0:55 6:27 0:30   0:14 1:54 7:23  
20 Kreider - 13 Hayes - 72 Chytil 7:46 0:02 0:15 0:45   1:31 5:44 2:07  
25 Gettinger - 38 Fogarty - 95 Lettieri 0:04 0:36 0:55 5:01   2:58 2:08 1:35  
26 Vesey - 93 Zibanejad         1:44 0:04 0:12   1:44
18 Staal - 44 Pionk 4:21 5:43 2:25 0:58 1:38 6:50 4:40 3:54 1:38
42 Smith - 76 Skjei 2:11 2:08 5:38 2:59   4:55 5:20 5:09  
22 Shattenkirk - 33 Claesson 5:50 2:49 1:41 3:26   5:12 4:07 4:58  
18 Staal - 42 Smith 0:26     0:14   0:36 0:44 0:20  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 69.4% 69.4%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 12.7%   12.7%  
Danault 5.7% 5.7%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 3.9% 3.9%    
Drouin-Danault 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 4.7% 4.7%    
Totals   87.3% 12.7%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Shaw 73.3% 73.3%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 10.9%   10.9%  
Danault 6.2%     6.2%
Tatar-Shaw 2.7% 2.7%    
Byron-Shaw 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 4.2% 4.2%    
Totals   82.9% 10.9% 6.2%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Lehkonen 61.3% 61.3%    
Gallagher-Domi-Drouin 12.1%   12.1%  
Lehkonen 4.7% 4.7%    
Tatar-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Byron-Shaw 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 14.9% 13.1% 1.8%  
Totals   86.1% 13.9%  
20 Deslauriers
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Agostino-Chaput 85.1% 85.1%    
Byron 3.6%     3.6%
Byron-Kotkaniemi 3.4% 3.4%    
Agostino-Danault 2.0% 2.0%    
Shaw 1.8%     1.8%
Others 4.1% 4.1%    
Totals   94.6%   5.4%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 70.9% 70.9%    
Domi 7.4%     7.4%
Byron-Lehkonen 6.1% 5.7% 0.4%  
Gallagher 5.8% 5.8%    
Tatar-Shaw 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 5.7% 5.6%   0.1%
Totals   92.1% 0.4% 7.5%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 70.7% 70.7%    
Danault-Lehkonen 6.6% 6.1% 0.5%  
Chaput-Lehkonen 4.1% 4.1%    
Kotkaniemi-Shaw 3.9% 3.9%    
Domi-Shaw 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 11.3% 8.8%   2.5%
Totals   97.0% 0.5% 2.5%
43 Chaput
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Agostino-Deslauriers 82.4% 82.4%    
Lehkonen 8.7%     8.7%
Byron-Lehkonen 5.7% 5.7%    
Byron-Domi 1.4% 1.4%    
Tatar-Gallagher 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   91.3%   8.7%
47 Agostino
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chaput-Deslauriers 79.8% 79.8%    
Tatar-Shaw 8.8%   8.8%  
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 4.2% 4.2%    
Domi-Shaw 2.2% 2.2%    
Danault-Deslauriers 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 3.2% 1.7% 1.5%  
Totals   89.7% 10.3%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi 70.6% 70.6%    
Byron-Danault 6.6% 6.1% 0.5%  
Chaput 6.3%     6.3%
Kotkaniemi 5.4% 5.4%    
Byron-Chaput 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 7.0% 7.0%    
Totals   93.2% 0.5% 6.3%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Domi 74.7% 74.7%    
Tatar-Agostino 5.2%   5.2%  
Tatar-Danault 3.6% 3.6%    
Byron-Kotkaniemi 3.1% 3.1%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 10.3% 6.7% 2.6% 1.0%
Totals   91.2% 7.8% 1.0%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 75.9% 75.9%    
Shaw-Agostino 6.5%   6.5%  
Danault-Shaw 4.5% 4.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 4.2% 4.2%    
Domi-Shaw 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 5.4% 3.3% 2.1%  
Totals   91.4% 8.6%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 75.3% 75.3%    
Gallagher-Domi-Kotkaniemi 11.2%   11.2%  
Danault-Gallagher 3.2% 3.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Shaw 3.1% 3.1%    
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 5.0% 2.4% 2.6%  
Totals   86.2% 13.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 78.5% 78.0% 0.3% 0.1%
  9.7%   9.7%  
Schlemko 7.5%     7.5%
Petry 2.6% 2.6%    
Reilly 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   82.4% 9.9% 7.6%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Reilly 89.3% 89.3%    
Petry 10.0% 5.2%   4.8%
Kulak 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   95.2%   4.8%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 91.2% 90.7% 0.3% 0.2%
Petry 3.7% 3.7%    
Reilly 2.6% 2.6%    
Schlemko 1.9% 1.9%    
Benn 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   99.5% 0.3% 0.2%
21 Schlemko
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 83.3% 77.6% 5.8%  
Weber 9.3%     9.3%
Reilly 5.3% 5.3%    
Kulak 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   85.0% 5.8% 9.3%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Schlemko 82.3% 76.6% 5.7%  
Benn 8.5% 4.4%   4.1%
Kulak 3.9% 3.9%    
Weber 3.2% 3.2%    
Reilly 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   90.2% 5.7% 4.1%
28 Reilly
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 86.2% 86.2%    
Schlemko 6.0% 6.0%    
Kulak 3.1% 3.1%    
Weber 2.4% 2.4%    
Petry 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page