Game #50 - January 19, 2019 - Philadelphia 5 at Montreal 2
Game #50 - January 19, 2019
  Philadelphia   5   at     Montreal   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin24 Danault11 Gallagher
14:18 14:18 0:00 0:00 -1
54 Hudon15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
11:28 11:28 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar13 Domi62 Lehkonen
10:30 10:30 0:00 0:00 +1
47 Agostino43 Chaput20 Deslauriers
7:10 7:10 0:00 0:00 -1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
2:24 0:00 0:00 2:24 E
90 Tatar13 Domi11 Gallagher
1:46 1:46 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia43 Chaput
1:32 0:00 0:00 1:32 E
Others 10:52 8:48 2:00 0:04 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
53 Mete  6 Weber
17:36 17:35 0:01 0:00 -1
28 Reilly26 Petry
14:24 14:24 0:00 0:00 -2
17 Kulak  8 Benn
13:09 13:09 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn  6 Weber
4:40 1:09 0:00 3:31 E
17 Kulak26 Petry
2:45 2:45 0:00 0:00 -1
17 Kulak53 Mete
1:17 1:17 0:00 0:00 +1
28 Reilly  8 Benn
1:17 1:17 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
1:09 0:00 1:09 0:00 E
Others 3:43 2:24 0:50 0:29 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
24PD
11BG
54CH
15JK
40JA
90TT
13MD
62AL
47KA
43MC
20ND
24PD
62AL
53VM
6SW
28MR
26JP
17BK
8JB
8JB
6SW
17BK
26JP
23 Lindblom - 14 Couturier - 93 Voracek 2:21 1:14 6:30 0:50   2:56 5:49 1:30    
25 Van Riemsdyk - 28 Giroux - 11 Konecny 8:36 0:26 0:32 1:03   9:18 1:18 0:18    
21 Laughton - 19 Patrick - 17 Simmonds 1:18 6:59 1:02 0:36   0:43 3:12 5:52   0:15
12 Raffl - 44 Varone - 15 Lehtera 0:02 0:45 0:56 3:23   0:03 0:53 3:36    
25 Van Riemsdyk - 14 Couturier - 17 Simmonds - 28 Giroux - 93 Voracek         1:08       1:38  
6 Sanheim - 9 Provorov 4:55 2:31 5:41 4:35   7:35 4:41 4:48   0:26
3 Gudas - 47 MacDonald 3:59 4:03 3:02 1:22   4:22 5:11 2:57   1:38
8 Hagg - 53 Gostisbehere 3:34 3:54 1:17 0:38   3:13 3:07 3:59    
        1:52       2:22  
3 Gudas - 8 Hagg 0:29 0:31 0:08     1:09 0:11 0:18   0:01

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Danault 77.3% 77.3%    
Tatar-Domi 9.5% 9.5%    
Armia-Lehkonen-Drouin 3.9%   3.9%  
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 3.6% 3.6%    
Armia-Tatar-Drouin 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 4.1% 4.1%    
Totals   96.1% 3.9%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Lehkonen 58.6% 58.6%    
Tatar-Gallagher 9.9% 9.9%    
Tatar-Armia 4.9% 4.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Hudon-Tatar 4.7%   4.7%  
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 18.2% 15.3% 2.5% 0.4%
Totals   92.5% 7.2% 0.4%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Armia 72.6% 72.6%    
Domi-Hudon-Tatar 5.3%   5.3%  
Gallagher-Domi-Drouin 4.2% 4.2%    
Domi-Lehkonen 4.1% 4.1%    
Hudon-Deslauriers 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 10.4% 10.4%    
Totals   94.7% 5.3%  
20 Deslauriers
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Agostino-Chaput 85.3% 85.3%    
Hudon-Kotkaniemi 6.3% 6.3%    
Drouin-Danault 2.6% 2.6%    
Hudon-Chaput 2.2% 2.2%    
Agostino-Domi 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Gallagher 79.1% 79.1%    
Lehkonen 13.3%     13.3%
Drouin-Lehkonen 2.8% 2.8%    
Drouin-Armia 2.4% 2.4%    
Drouin-Deslauriers 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   86.7%   13.3%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Kotkaniemi 67.6% 67.6%    
Chaput 9.0%     9.0%
Tatar-Domi 5.2% 5.2%    
Gallagher-Lehkonen-Drouin 4.2%   4.2%  
Agostino-Kotkaniemi 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 11.0% 11.0%    
Totals   86.7% 4.2% 9.0%
43 Chaput
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Agostino-Deslauriers 77.3% 77.3%    
Armia 16.5%     16.5%
Hudon-Deslauriers 2.0% 2.0%    
Agostino-Armia 2.0% 2.0%    
Hudon-Armia 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   83.5%   16.5%
47 Agostino
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chaput-Deslauriers 89.0% 89.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 6.2% 6.2%    
Chaput-Armia 2.3% 2.3%    
Domi-Deslauriers 1.9% 1.9%    
Danault-Deslauriers 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 75.4% 75.4%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 5.5%   5.5%  
Tatar-Domi 4.4% 4.3% 0.1%  
Kotkaniemi-Deslauriers 3.5% 3.5%    
Domi-Tatar-Drouin 2.8%   2.8%  
Others 8.4% 8.4%    
Totals   91.6% 8.4%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Domi 65.4% 65.4%    
Danault 14.9%     14.9%
Gallagher-Armia-Drouin 4.5%   4.5%  
Domi-Kotkaniemi 4.0% 4.0%    
Drouin-Danault 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 8.1% 7.7%   0.4%
Totals   80.2% 4.5% 15.4%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Lehkonen 62.1% 62.1%    
Domi-Gallagher 10.4% 10.4%    
Domi-Armia 5.2% 5.2%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Hudon 4.9%   4.9%  
Domi-Hudon 3.9% 3.8% 0.1%  
Others 13.4% 10.8% 2.6%  
Totals   92.4% 7.6%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 76.1% 76.1%    
Gallagher-Armia-Lehkonen 3.8%   3.8%  
Gallagher-Domi-Kotkaniemi 3.5% 3.5%    
Danault-Lehkonen 2.7% 2.7%    
Danault-Armia 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 11.5% 9.2% 2.3%  
Totals   93.9% 6.1%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 71.4% 71.3% 0.1%  
Benn 18.9% 4.7%   14.3%
  4.7%   4.7%  
Reilly 2.6% 2.6%    
Petry 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   81.0% 4.7% 14.3%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 67.1% 67.1%    
Weber 23.8% 5.9%   18.0%
Reilly 6.6% 6.6%    
Petry 2.5%     2.5%
Totals   79.6%   20.4%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 73.4% 73.4%    
Petry 15.3% 15.3%    
Mete 7.2% 7.2%    
Reilly 3.7% 3.7%    
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Reilly 74.6% 74.6%    
Kulak 14.2% 14.2%    
  4.3%   4.3%  
Weber 2.7% 2.7%    
Benn 2.5%     2.5%
Others 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   93.2% 4.3% 2.5%
28 Reilly
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 83.8% 83.8%    
Benn 7.5% 7.5%    
Kulak 3.9% 3.9%    
Weber 3.8% 3.8%    
Mete 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 90.8% 90.7% 0.1%  
Kulak 6.6% 6.6%    
Petry 1.6% 1.6%    
Reilly 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   99.9% 0.1%  

Back to main page