Game #55 - February 7, 2019 - Winnipeg 2 at Montreal 5
Game #55 - February 7, 2019
  Winnipeg   2   at     Montreal   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin24 Danault11 Gallagher
 12:07 12:07 0:00 0:00 +3
90 Tatar13 Domi63 Peca
 11:23 11:23 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 10:49 10:49 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon43 Chaput20 Deslauriers
 6:47 6:47 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:47 0:00 0:00 1:47 E
40 Armia43 Chaput
 1:41 0:00 0:00 1:41 E
92 Drouin13 Domi63 Peca
 1:08 1:08 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin15 Kotkaniemi11 Gallagher
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia62 Lehkonen
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 12:12 9:23 2:17 0:32 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
53 Mete  6 Weber
 17:09 17:09 0:00 0:00 +4
28 Reilly26 Petry
 16:25 15:32 0:53 0:00 E
17 Kulak  8 Benn
 14:18 14:18 0:00 0:00 -1
53 Mete26 Petry
 3:38 1:56 0:00 1:42 E
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 2:49 0:31 0:00 2:18 E
17 Kulak28 Reilly
 1:16 1:16 0:00 0:00 -1
  6 Weber
 1:00 0:00 1:00 0:00 E
Others 3:25 3:01 0:24 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
24PD
11BG		 90TT
13MD
63MP		 62AL
15JK
40JA		 54CH
43MC
20ND		 53VM
6SW		 28MR
26JP		 17BK
8JB		 53VM
26JP		 8JB
6SW
81 Connor - 55 Scheifele - 26 Wheeler 10:30 1:00   0:13 12:37 0:12 0:22   0:14
13 Tanev - 17 Lowry - 85 Perreault 0:14 3:52 5:22 0:05 0:09 3:28 6:07 0:52  
28 Roslovic - 18 Little - 29 Laine 0:06 4:51 2:05 0:09 0:41 6:06 1:50    
48 Lemieux - 9 Copp - 82 Appleton 0:24   1:23 5:40 1:05 2:26 3:58    
81 Connor - 28 Roslovic - 55 Scheifele - 26 Wheeler               0:56 1:18
82 Appleton - 18 Little - 29 Laine   0:18 1:18 0:01   0:53 0:51    
7 Chiarot - 33 Byfuglien 8:58 2:21 0:43 1:35 12:07 2:31 1:48 1:04 0:12
5 Kulikov - 57 Myers   5:35 5:34 2:09 0:18 7:00 6:46 0:52  
8 Trouba - 70 Morrow 2:40 2:31 3:33 2:44 3:26 4:20 4:55   0:02
8 Trouba - 57 Myers     0:02     1:29     0:40
33 Byfuglien - 57 Myers 0:06 0:39     0:20 0:03   0:46 0:37

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Danault 77.8% 77.8%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 6.8% 6.8%    
Hudon-Domi 4.0%   4.0%  
Tatar-Danault 3.4% 3.4%    
Domi-Hudon-Lehkonen 2.8%   2.8%  
Others 5.2% 4.4% 0.9%  
Totals   92.4% 7.6%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Peca 67.0% 67.0%    
Drouin-Peca 6.7% 6.7%    
Lehkonen-Peca 4.0% 4.0%    
Tatar-Armia 3.7% 3.7%    
Hudon-Gallagher 3.6%   3.6%  
Others 15.0% 10.1% 4.9%  
Totals   91.5% 8.5%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Armia 76.3% 76.3%    
Drouin-Gallagher 7.5% 7.5%    
Armia-Lehkonen-Tatar 3.9%   3.9%  
Tatar-Deslauriers 3.4% 3.4%    
Hudon-Deslauriers 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 6.5% 3.2% 2.0% 1.3%
Totals   92.8% 5.9% 1.3%
20 Deslauriers
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Chaput 72.8% 72.8%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 5.2% 5.2%    
Tatar-Domi 4.1% 4.1%    
Hudon-Kotkaniemi 3.8% 3.8%    
Hudon-Domi 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 10.4% 10.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Gallagher 70.1% 70.1%    
Lehkonen 10.3%     10.3%
Drouin-Armia 3.9% 3.9%    
Tatar-Gallagher 3.1% 3.1%    
Lehkonen-Peca 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 10.0% 6.9% 1.5% 1.5%
Totals   86.6% 1.5% 11.9%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 66.6% 66.6%    
Chaput 10.4%     10.4%
Lehkonen 6.4% 6.4%    
Drouin-Danault 4.1% 4.1%    
Tatar-Domi 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 8.7% 3.6% 5.1%  
Totals   84.5% 5.1% 10.4%
43 Chaput
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Deslauriers 61.7% 61.7%    
Armia 15.3%     15.3%
Hudon-Peca 7.9% 7.9%    
Hudon-Armia 2.6% 2.6%    
Danault 2.4%     2.4%
Others 10.2% 9.4%   0.8%
Totals   81.5%   18.5%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Chaput-Deslauriers 64.3% 64.3%    
Chaput-Peca 8.2% 8.2%    
Domi-Gallagher 5.8%   5.8%  
Gallagher-Domi-Lehkonen 4.1%   4.1%  
Kotkaniemi-Deslauriers 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 14.2% 13.0% 1.3%  
Totals   88.8% 11.2%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 63.8% 63.8%    
Danault 10.5%     10.5%
Armia 6.1% 6.1%    
Domi-Peca 4.0% 4.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Tatar 3.2%   3.2%  
Others 12.4% 7.8% 4.1% 0.5%
Totals   81.6% 7.4% 11.0%
63 Peca
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Domi 75.3% 75.3%    
Drouin-Domi 7.5% 7.5%    
Hudon-Chaput 5.7% 5.7%    
Lehkonen-Domi 4.5% 4.5%    
Lehkonen-Danault 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Peca 71.4% 71.4%    
Domi-Armia 4.0% 4.0%    
Domi 3.5% 3.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Lehkonen 3.5%   3.5%  
Danault-Gallagher 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 14.3% 11.4% 1.8% 1.2%
Totals   93.6% 5.2% 1.2%
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 74.7% 74.7%    
Domi-Peca 7.0% 7.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 6.6% 6.6%    
Danault-Armia 4.1% 4.1%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Tatar 1.7%   1.7%  
Others 5.9% 5.0% 0.8%  
Totals   97.4% 2.6%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 77.3% 77.3%    
Benn 12.7% 2.3%   10.4%
  4.5%   4.5%  
Reilly 3.8% 3.8%    
Petry 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   85.1% 4.5% 10.4%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 83.0% 83.0%    
Weber 16.3% 3.0%   13.3%
Petry 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   86.7%   13.3%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 85.4% 85.4%    
Reilly 7.6% 7.6%    
Petry 5.2% 5.2%    
Mete 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Reilly 75.2% 71.1% 4.0%  
Mete 16.6% 8.9%   7.8%
Kulak 4.0% 4.0%    
  1.8%   1.8%  
Weber 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   86.3% 5.9% 7.8%
28 Reilly
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 86.4% 81.8% 4.6%  
Kulak 6.7% 6.7%    
Weber 4.4% 4.4%    
Mete 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   95.4% 4.6%  
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 79.5% 79.5%    
Petry 16.8% 9.0%   7.9%
Reilly 2.2% 2.2%    
Kulak 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   92.1%   7.9%
Back to main page