Game #58 - February 16, 2019 - Montreal 0 at Tampa Bay 3

Game #58 - February 16, 2019

Montreal

Tampa Bay

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.

NHL.com links:

Scoresheet Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play

Lines and defensive pairings

Line

Time

+/-

90 Tatar

13 Domi

65 Shaw

12:02

11:50

0:12

0:00

92 Drouin

24 Danault

11 Gallagher

11:13

11:13

0:00

-1

62 Lehkonen

15 Kotkaniemi

40 Armia

10:22

10:22

0:00

-1

20 Deslauriers

21 Thompson

22 Weise

7:29

7:26

0:03

0:00

24 Danault

62 Lehkonen

3:23

0:58

0:00

2:25

21 Thompson

40 Armia

2:10

0:00

2:10

24 Danault

40 Armia

1:25

0:06

0:00

1:19

15 Kotkaniemi - 40 Armia - 90 Tatar - 92 Drouin

1:09

0:00

1:09

0:00

21 Thompson

62 Lehkonen

1:02

0:00

1:02

Others

9:45

8:26

0:51

0:28

Pair

Time

+/-

28 Reilly

26 Petry

17:12

16:38

0:34

0:00

-1

17 Kulak

8 Benn

16:02

15:47

0:15

0:00

-1

53 Mete

6 Weber

13:16

13:14

0:00

0:02

8 Benn

6 Weber

5:11

0:36

0:00

4:35

53 Mete

26 Petry

3:26

0:46

0:00

2:40

17 Kulak

28 Reilly

1:16

1:16

0:00

6 Weber

1:09

0:00

1:09

0:00

Others

2:28

2:04

0:17

0:07

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair

90TT
13MD
65AS

92JD
24PD
11BG

62AL
15JK
40JA

20ND
21NT
22DW

24PD
62AL

21NT
40JA

28MR
26JP

17BK
8JB

53VM
6SW

8JB
6SW

53VM
26JP

37 Gourde - 21 Point - 86 Kucherov

1:07

9:21

0:25

0:34

2:16

1:47

8:55

0:35

0:09

18 Palat - 91 Stamkos - 9 Johnson

0:39

0:24

7:30

0:33

4:26

3:15

1:37

0:22

10 Miller - 71 Cirelli - 17 Killorn

7:25

0:20

0:39

0:02

4:34

3:42

0:23

73 Erne - 13 Paquette - 7 Joseph

1:09

0:13

0:07

6:06

2:49

3:23

1:21

0:06

18 Palat - 21 Point - 91 Stamkos - 86 Kucherov

2:14

1:38

3:56

1:04

27 McDonagh - 81 Cernak

3:05

6:25

0:29

2:59

0:50

6:15

2:50

5:21

0:35

0:09

5 Girardi - 77 Hedman

6:33

2:43

2:36

0:41

5:55

4:00

3:17

0:06

6 Stralman - 98 Sergachev

1:38

1:27

6:09

2:59

3:08

7:17

2:41

0:17

77 Hedman

2:14

1:57

4:12

1:27

6 Stralman - 77 Hedman

0:25

0:36

0:05

0:45

0:19

1:08

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Drouin-Danault	76.5%	76.5%
Shaw-Danault	5.2%	5.2%
Shaw-Domi	5.1%	1.3%	3.9%
Kotkaniemi	3.3%	3.3%
Drouin-Kotkaniemi	3.3%	3.3%
Others	6.6%	4.7%	1.9%
Totals		94.2%	5.8%

13 Domi

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Tatar-Shaw	78.4%	77.1%	1.3%
Lehkonen-Armia	5.3%	5.3%
Shaw-Gallagher	4.9%	1.2%	3.7%
Drouin-Shaw	2.6%	2.6%
Deslauriers-Weise	2.6%	2.6%
Others	6.2%	4.3%	1.8%
Totals		93.2%	6.8%

15 Kotkaniemi

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Lehkonen-Armia	78.7%	78.7%
Armia-Tatar-Drouin	8.7%		8.7%
Gallagher	3.7%	3.7%
Drouin-Gallagher	3.7%	3.7%
Drouin-Armia	2.2%	2.2%
Others	3.0%	3.0%
Totals		91.3%	8.7%

20 Deslauriers

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Thompson-Weise	80.5%	79.9%	0.5%
Danault-Weise	8.1%	8.1%
Domi-Weise	4.3%	4.3%
Thompson-Gallagher	2.3%	2.3%
Kotkaniemi-Weise	2.0%	2.0%
Others	2.9%	2.9%
Totals		99.5%	0.5%

21 Thompson

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Deslauriers-Weise	63.9%	63.4%	0.4%
Armia	18.5%			18.5%
Lehkonen	8.8%			8.8%
Tatar-Shaw	2.7%	2.7%
Deslauriers-Gallagher	1.8%	1.8%
Others	4.3%	4.3%
Totals		72.3%	0.4%	27.3%

22 Weise

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Deslauriers-Thompson	83.5%	82.9%	0.6%
Deslauriers-Danault	8.4%	8.4%
Deslauriers-Domi	4.5%	4.5%
Deslauriers-Kotkaniemi	2.0%	2.0%
Danault-Armia	1.7%	1.7%
Totals		99.4%	0.6%

24 Danault

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Drouin-Gallagher	59.7%	59.7%
Lehkonen	18.0%	5.1%	12.9%
Armia	7.5%	0.5%	7.0%
Shaw-Gallagher	4.1%	4.1%
Deslauriers-Weise	4.0%	4.0%
Others	6.7%	6.7%
Totals		80.1%	19.9%

40 Armia

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi	59.3%	59.3%
Thompson	12.4%			12.4%
Danault	8.1%	0.6%		7.5%
Kotkaniemi-Tatar-Drouin	6.6%		6.6%
Lehkonen-Domi	4.7%	4.7%
Others	9.0%	9.0%
Totals		73.5%	6.6%	19.9%

62 Lehkonen

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia	62.2%	62.2%
Danault	20.3%	5.8%	14.5%
Thompson	6.2%		6.2%
Domi-Armia	4.9%	4.9%
Shaw	2.8%		2.8%
Others	3.6%	3.6%
Totals		76.5%	23.5%

65 Shaw

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Tatar-Domi	76.1%	74.8%	1.3%
Danault-Gallagher	4.8%	4.8%
Domi-Gallagher	4.7%	1.2%	3.6%
Lehkonen	3.0%			3.0%
Drouin-Domi	2.5%	2.5%
Others	8.9%	8.9%
Totals		92.2%	4.8%	3.0%

90 Tatar

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Domi-Shaw	82.3%	81.0%	1.4%
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Drouin	7.9%		7.9%
Thompson-Shaw	2.2%	2.2%
Danault-Gallagher	1.7%	1.7%
Kotkaniemi-Armia	1.5%	1.5%
Others	4.4%	4.4%
Totals		90.8%	9.2%

92 Drouin

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Danault-Gallagher	77.0%	77.0%
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Tatar	7.9%		7.9%
Armia	3.7%	3.7%
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher	3.3%	3.3%
Domi-Shaw	2.7%	2.7%
Others	5.4%	5.4%
Totals		92.1%	7.9%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Mete	65.2%	65.0%		0.2%
Benn	25.5%	2.9%		22.5%
	5.7%		5.7%
Reilly-Petry	1.4%		1.4%
Kulak-Mete	1.1%	1.1%
Others	1.1%	1.1%
Totals		70.3%	7.0%	22.7%

8 Benn

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Kulak	71.4%	70.3%	1.1%
Weber	23.1%	2.7%		20.4%
Reilly	3.2%	3.2%
Mete	2.4%	1.9%		0.5%
Totals		78.0%	1.1%	20.9%

17 Kulak

Partner	Total	EV	PP
Benn	89.7%	88.3%	1.4%
Reilly	7.1%	7.1%
Mete-Weber	1.3%	1.3%
Petry	1.1%	1.1%
Mete	0.7%	0.7%
Totals		98.6%	1.4%

26 Petry

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Reilly	80.4%	77.7%	2.6%
Mete	16.0%	3.6%		12.5%
Reilly-Weber	1.3%		1.3%
Kulak	0.9%	0.9%
Weber	0.7%	0.7%
Others	0.6%	0.6%
Totals		83.6%	4.0%	12.5%

28 Reilly

Partner	Total	EV	PP
Petry	87.4%	84.5%	2.9%
Kulak	6.4%	6.4%
Benn	3.6%	3.6%
Petry-Weber	1.4%		1.4%
Mete-Petry	0.7%	0.7%
Others	0.4%	0.4%
Totals		95.7%	4.3%

53 Mete

Partner	Total	EV	SH
Weber	74.8%	74.6%	0.2%
Petry	19.4%	4.3%	15.0%
Benn	3.0%	2.3%	0.7%
Kulak-Weber	1.3%	1.3%
Reilly-Petry	0.8%	0.8%
Others	0.8%	0.8%
Totals		84.1%	15.9%

Back to main page