Game #63 - February 25, 2019 - Montreal 1 at New Jersey 2
Game #63 - February 25, 2019
  Montreal   1   at     New Jersey   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar13 Domi65 Shaw
 11:52 9:01 2:42 0:09 E
92 Drouin24 Danault11 Gallagher
 10:23 10:23 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 5:17 5:17 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen21 Thompson63 Peca
 3:31 3:31 0:00 0:00 -2
21 Thompson40 Armia
 2:37 0:00 0:00 2:37 E
90 Tatar13 Domi41 Byron
 2:12 2:12 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:11 0:00 0:00 2:11 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 1:49 1:49 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron21 Thompson40 Armia
 1:37 1:37 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 15 Kotkaniemi - 24 Danault - 92 Drouin 1:30 0:00 1:30 0:00 E
13 Domi - 65 Shaw - 90 Tatar - 92 Drouin 1:21 0:07 1:14 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 15 Kotkaniemi - 41 Byron - 92 Drouin 1:13 0:04 1:09 0:00 E
15 Kotkaniemi24 Danault11 Gallagher
 1:01 0:00 1:01 0:00 E
Others 13:11 8:22 0:24 4:25 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
28 Reilly26 Petry
 12:34 12:34 0:00 0:00 E
17 Kulak  8 Benn
 10:00 10:00 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
 9:57 9:57 0:00 0:00 -2
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 8:18 2:01 0:00 6:17 +1
26 Petry  6 Weber
 4:03 0:00 3:43 0:20 E
53 Mete26 Petry
 2:49 1:33 0:00 1:16 E
28 Reilly
 2:41 0:08 2:33 0:00 E
17 Kulak28 Reilly
 2:08 2:08 0:00 0:00 E
17 Kulak53 Mete
 1:20 1:20 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
 1:16 0:00 1:16 0:00 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
 1:07 1:00 0:00 0:07 E
Others 3:32 1:42 0:28 1:22 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
13MD
65AS		 92JD
24PD
11BG		 41PB
15JK
40JA		 62AL
21NT
63MP		 21NT
40JA		 90TT
13MD
41PB		 24PD
62AL		 28MR
26JP		 17BK
8JB		 53VM
6SW		 8JB
6SW		 26JP
6SW		 53VM
26JP		 28MR 17BK
28MR
18 Stafford - 41 McLeod - 42 Bastian 0:23   1:59 0:29   1:23   1:05 2:10   0:15        
20 Coleman - 13 Hischier - 21 Palmieri 0:25 2:14 0:29         0:12 1:41 1:34         0:28
13 Hischier - 19 Zajac - 21 Palmieri - 42 Bastian         1:41   0:52       3:12 0:20      
19 Zajac - 20 Coleman 1:49                     2:31   0:36  
20 Coleman - 19 Zajac - 21 Palmieri 0:23 1:07   0:42       0:10 0:20 1:35     0:08   0:17
17 Agostino - 58 Rooney - 39 Gabriel 0:01 0:14 0:08 0:50       0:14 0:36 0:13         0:45
20 Coleman - 19 Zajac - 47 Quenneville 1:45 0:15 0:06         1:51   0:40          
13 Hischier - 58 Rooney 0:14                     0:14   1:40  
17 Agostino - 41 McLeod - 39 Gabriel   0:02 0:59         0:18 1:44           0:11
21 Palmieri - 13 Hischier - 47 Quenneville   2:11           1:38   0:33     0:01    
6 Greene - 28 Severson 4:32 7:17 1:33     0:43   5:49 2:49 3:38 0:22 3:33 0:28 0:53 0:32
5 Carrick - 25 Mueller 3:38 2:28 2:10 1:41   1:09   4:36 2:46 3:25 0:34   0:06 0:12 0:08
16 Santini - 74 Yakovlev 2:44 0:36 0:45 1:38   0:20   1:58 2:59 1:59 0:51   0:26   0:34
28 Severson         2:07   1:22       5:31 0:20      
5 Carrick - 74 Yakovlev     0:48 0:12     0:11   0:48 0:15     0:44   0:09
16 Santini - 25 Mueller 0:19                 0:40       0:52 0:45
6 Greene - 25 Mueller 0:36   0:01         0:09 0:38     0:07   0:30  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Danault 60.0% 60.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Drouin 8.7%   8.7%  
Kotkaniemi-Byron-Drouin 7.0% 0.4% 6.6%  
Kotkaniemi-Danault 5.9%   5.9%  
Drouin-Domi 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 14.5% 10.5% 1.3% 2.7%
Totals   74.9% 22.4% 2.7%
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Shaw 60.5% 46.0% 13.8% 0.8%
Tatar-Byron 11.2% 11.2%    
Shaw-Tatar-Drouin 6.9% 0.6% 6.3%  
Drouin-Gallagher 3.5% 3.5%    
Drouin-Shaw 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 14.7% 11.6% 1.1% 2.0%
Totals   76.1% 21.2% 2.7%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Armia 40.1% 40.1%    
Lehkonen-Armia 13.8% 13.8%    
Gallagher-Danault-Drouin 11.4%   11.4%  
Gallagher-Byron-Drouin 9.2% 0.5% 8.7%  
Danault-Gallagher 7.7%   7.7%  
Others 17.8% 14.8% 3.0%  
Totals   69.2% 30.8%  
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Peca 31.1% 31.1%    
Armia 23.2%     23.2%
Byron-Armia 14.3% 14.3%    
Lehkonen-Armia 6.6% 6.6%    
Lehkonen 5.3%     5.3%
Others 19.5% 11.7%   7.8%
Totals   63.7%   36.3%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Gallagher 53.2% 53.2%    
Lehkonen 11.2%     11.2%
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 7.7%   7.7%  
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 5.2%   5.2%  
Byron 4.8%     4.8%
Others 18.0% 10.8% 0.9% 6.2%
Totals   64.0% 13.8% 22.2%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi 40.7% 40.7%    
Thompson 20.2%     20.2%
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 14.0% 14.0%    
Byron-Thompson 12.5% 12.5%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 5.8% 5.8%    
Others 6.8% 6.3%   0.5%
Totals   79.3%   20.7%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 38.8% 38.8%    
Tatar-Domi 16.1% 16.1%    
Thompson-Armia 11.9% 11.9%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Drouin 8.9% 0.5% 8.4%  
Danault 6.8%     6.8%
Others 17.5% 4.2% 1.6% 11.7%
Totals   71.4% 10.0% 18.6%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Peca 34.6% 34.6%    
Danault 21.5%     21.5%
Kotkaniemi-Armia 17.9% 17.9%    
Thompson-Armia 7.4% 7.4%    
Thompson 5.9%     5.9%
Others 12.8% 12.8%    
Totals   72.6%   27.4%
63 Peca
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Thompson 66.1% 66.1%    
Drouin-Danault 11.9% 11.9%    
Lehkonen-Domi 7.8% 7.8%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 7.8% 7.8%    
Tatar-Thompson 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Domi 76.4% 58.0% 17.4% 1.0%
Domi-Tatar-Drouin 8.7% 0.8% 7.9%  
Drouin-Domi 4.0% 4.0%    
Drouin-Danault 3.9% 3.9%    
Domi-Byron-Tatar 2.0%     2.0%
Others 5.0% 3.9% 1.2%  
Totals   70.5% 26.5% 3.0%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 67.9% 51.6% 15.4% 0.9%
Domi-Byron 12.6% 12.6%    
Domi-Shaw-Drouin 7.7% 0.7% 7.1%  
Domi-Gallagher 1.8% 1.8%    
Domi-Byron-Shaw 1.8%     1.8%
Others 8.2% 5.7% 1.0% 1.4%
Totals   72.4% 23.5% 4.1%
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 55.8% 55.8%    
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Danault 8.1%   8.1%  
Domi-Shaw-Tatar 7.3% 0.6% 6.6%  
Gallagher-Kotkaniemi-Byron 6.5% 0.4% 6.2%  
Domi-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 18.7% 17.0%   1.7%
Totals   77.4% 20.9% 1.7%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 42.4% 42.4%    
Benn 35.4% 8.6%   26.8%
Petry 17.3%   15.8% 1.4%
  2.3% 0.4% 2.0%  
Kulak 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   53.9% 17.8% 28.2%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 49.9% 49.9%    
Weber 41.4% 10.1%   31.3%
Petry 5.6% 5.0%   0.6%
Mete 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   68.1%   31.9%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 69.8% 69.8%    
Reilly 14.9% 14.9%    
Mete 9.3% 9.3%    
Weber 3.3% 3.3%    
Petry 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Reilly 56.6% 56.6%    
Weber 18.2%   16.7% 1.5%
Mete 12.7% 7.0%   5.7%
  5.7%   5.7%  
Benn 5.0% 4.5%   0.5%
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   69.8% 22.4% 7.7%
28 Reilly
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 71.7% 71.7%    
  15.3% 0.8% 14.6%  
Kulak 12.2% 12.2%    
Weber 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   85.4% 14.6%  
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 65.5% 65.5%    
Petry 18.5% 10.2%   8.3%
Kulak 8.8% 8.8%    
Benn 4.2% 4.2%    
  3.1%     3.1%
Totals   88.6%   11.4%
Back to main page