Game #64 - February 26, 2019 - Montreal 8 at Detroit 1
Game #64 - February 26, 2019
  Montreal   8   at     Detroit   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin13 Domi65 Shaw
 12:20 12:20 0:00 0:00 +5
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 10:30 10:30 0:00 0:00 +1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 10:23 10:23 0:00 0:00 +2
62 Lehkonen21 Thompson22 Weise
 8:50 8:50 0:00 0:00 -1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 3:37 0:00 0:00 3:37 E
21 Thompson40 Armia
 2:44 0:00 0:00 2:44 E
24 Danault41 Byron
 1:25 0:00 0:00 1:25 E
21 Thompson62 Lehkonen
 1:23 0:00 0:00 1:23 E
Others 8:48 7:58 0:00 0:50 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak32 Folin
 15:24 15:24 0:00 0:00 +3
  8 Benn26 Petry
 11:39 11:39 0:00 0:00 +1
53 Mete  6 Weber
 10:31 10:31 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 9:44 3:50 0:00 5:54 +1
53 Mete26 Petry
 7:52 5:01 0:00 2:51 +1
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:36 1:10 0:00 0:26 E
53 Mete32 Folin
 1:01 0:13 0:00 0:48 E
Others 2:13 2:13 0:00 0:00 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
13MD
65AS		 41PB
15JK
40JA		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
21NT
22DW		 24PD
62AL		 21NT
40JA		 17BK
32CF		 8JB
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 8JB
6SW		 53VM
26JP
43 Helm - 71 Larkin - 39 Mantha 5:05 1:16 3:16 0:43     5:24 1:24 2:39 0:46 1:12
27 Rasmussen - 51 Nielsen - 41 Glendening 2:18 1:59 3:57 0:37     2:23 4:27 1:01 0:42 0:51
59 Bertuzzi - 72 Athanasiou - 11 Zadina 1:26 4:32 0:32 1:01     4:07 1:26 1:24   0:42
8 Abdelkader - 61 De la Rose - 28 Witkowski 0:15 0:43 0:07 4:18     0:25 2:07 2:05 1:27 0:54
27 Rasmussen - 71 Larkin - 72 Athanasiou - 39 Mantha         1:54 1:26       2:12 1:35
8 Abdelkader - 51 Nielsen - 11 Zadina         0:51 0:29       1:41 0:29
25 Green - 55 Kronwall 6:11 2:07 0:44 2:54 0:45 0:29 3:28 5:14 1:45 3:22 2:33
65 Dekeyser - 74 Bowey 2:59 1:17 1:48 1:26 0:07   4:27 1:32 1:32   0:44
17 Hronek - 65 Dekeyser 1:11 0:53 5:21 0:30     1:48 3:19 1:04 1:17 1:16
52 Ericsson - 74 Bowey   4:30 0:20 1:41     2:43 0:44 1:41 0:25 1:05
17 Hronek - 52 Ericsson 1:41 1:08 1:48 1:28     1:41 0:25 4:05 0:10  
17 Hronek         2:24 1:28       2:44 1:38

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 88.9% 88.9%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 6.8% 6.8%    
Drouin-Danault 1.9% 1.9%    
Tatar-Domi 1.3% 1.3%    
Byron-Kotkaniemi 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Shaw 89.3% 89.3%    
Byron-Armia 2.8% 2.8%    
Byron-Shaw 2.7% 2.7%    
Drouin-Armia 1.2% 1.2%    
Tatar-Gallagher 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 3.0% 3.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Armia 84.6% 84.6%    
Tatar-Gallagher 6.4% 6.4%    
Drouin-Armia 2.7% 2.7%    
Byron-Shaw 1.9% 1.9%    
Byron-Thompson 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weise 55.2% 55.2%    
Armia 17.1%     17.1%
Lehkonen 8.6%     8.6%
Byron-Armia 3.1% 3.1%    
Lehkonen-Armia 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 12.9% 7.7%   5.2%
Totals   69.1%   30.9%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Thompson 85.2% 85.2%    
Tatar-Danault 7.9% 7.9%    
Tatar-Thompson 1.8% 1.8%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 1.3% 1.3%    
Domi-Thompson 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 55.7% 55.7%    
Lehkonen 19.4%     19.4%
Byron 7.6%     7.6%
Tatar-Weise 4.4% 4.4%    
Byron-Armia 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 10.6% 8.7%   2.0%
Totals   71.0%   29.0%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi 65.8% 65.8%    
Thompson 17.1%     17.1%
Byron-Thompson 3.1% 3.1%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 3.0% 3.0%    
Byron-Danault 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 8.3% 8.3%    
Totals   82.9%   17.1%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 70.5% 70.5%    
Danault 9.5%     9.5%
Thompson-Armia 3.4% 3.4%    
Thompson 3.1%     3.1%
Danault-Armia 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 10.7% 10.7%    
Totals   87.4%   12.6%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 57.9% 57.9%    
Danault 23.7%     23.7%
Thompson 9.1%     9.1%
Thompson-Armia 3.2% 3.2%    
Thompson-Shaw 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   67.2%   32.8%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Domi 86.4% 86.4%    
Drouin-Danault 2.9% 2.9%    
Byron-Domi 2.6% 2.6%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 2.3% 2.3%    
Tatar-Danault 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 80.4% 80.4%    
Danault-Weise 6.3% 6.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 6.2% 6.2%    
Danault-Shaw 2.3% 2.3%    
Danault-Armia 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 89.4% 89.4%    
Danault-Shaw 3.0% 3.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 2.4% 2.4%    
Thompson-Shaw 1.6% 1.6%    
Danault-Gallagher 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   100.0%    

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 46.8% 46.8%    
Benn 43.4% 17.1%   26.3%
Petry 7.1% 5.2%   1.9%
Folin 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   71.8%   28.2%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 52.0% 52.0%    
Weber 43.5% 17.1%   26.4%
Mete 2.3% 2.3%    
Folin 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   73.6%   26.4%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 96.1% 96.1%    
Petry 2.9% 2.9%    
Mete 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 54.0% 54.0%    
Mete 36.4% 23.2%   13.2%
Weber 7.4% 5.4%   2.0%
Kulak 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   84.8%   15.2%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 88.0% 88.0%    
Mete 5.8% 1.2%   4.6%
Weber 3.4% 3.4%    
Benn 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   95.4%   4.6%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 52.4% 52.4%    
Petry 39.2% 25.0%   14.2%
Folin 5.1% 1.1%   4.0%
Benn 2.6% 2.6%    
Kulak 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   81.8%   18.2%
Back to main page