Game #65 - March 1, 2019 - Montreal 4 at N.Y. Rangers 2
Game #65 - March 1, 2019
  Montreal   4   at     N.Y. Rangers   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
92 Drouin13 Domi65 Shaw
 11:55 11:55 0:00 0:00 -1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 11:52 11:52 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen21 Thompson22 Weise
 8:57 8:57 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 8:43 8:43 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 41 Byron - 65 Shaw - 92 Drouin 1:31 0:00 1:31 0:00 E
11 Gallagher13 Domi
 1:19 1:19 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 +1
Others 14:37 11:24 0:51 2:22 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
53 Mete  6 Weber
 20:16 18:27 0:51 0:58 E
17 Kulak32 Folin
 15:07 15:07 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
 14:47 14:47 0:00 0:00 E
32 Folin  6 Weber
 1:41 1:29 0:00 0:12 E
17 Kulak26 Petry
 1:33 0:31 0:00 1:02 E
26 Petry
 1:31 0:00 1:31 0:00 E
26 Petry32 Folin
 1:15 1:15 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 +1
Others 2:46 2:36 0:00 0:10 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 92JD
13MD
65AS		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
21NT
22DW		 41PB
15JK
40JA		 53VM
6SW		 17BK
32CF		 8JB
26JP
26 Vesey - 93 Zibanejad - 20 Kreider 2:03 5:50 2:18 1:05 4:43 2:41 4:23
23 Brickley - 24 Nieves 0:38 1:43 3:03 1:46 2:45 3:45 1:03
90 Namestnikov - 16 Strome - 17 Fast 5:20 0:34 0:15 1:13 1:43 2:03 3:25
48 Lemieux - 50 Andersson - 89 Buchnevich 0:46 1:07 0:49 2:31 2:48 2:26 1:06
18 Staal - 77 Deangelo 5:40 4:20 1:05 0:32 6:37 1:56 3:54
22 Shattenkirk - 76 Skjei 2:43 2:52 0:34 2:18 3:26 2:42 3:14
43 Hajek - 44 Pionk 0:56 0:52 1:06 1:56 1:53 2:13 2:17
42 Smith - 43 Hajek - 44 Pionk 1:00 1:06 2:25 0:39 1:39 3:14 1:11
76 Skjei - 77 Deangelo 0:03   0:22 0:51 1:14 0:41 0:57
77 Deangelo   0:43 0:36   1:37   0:39
22 Shattenkirk - 43 Hajek 0:39   1:09 0:26 0:43 1:01 0:43
18 Staal - 42 Smith - 77 Deangelo 0:03 0:26   0:45 1:01 0:50 0:03

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 74.5% 74.5%    
Domi 8.3% 8.3%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 5.0% 0.3% 4.7%  
Danault 4.1% 4.1%    
Byron-Danault 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   95.3% 4.7%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Shaw 69.8% 69.8%    
Byron-Shaw-Drouin 8.9%   8.9%  
Gallagher 7.7% 7.7%    
Tatar-Shaw 4.2% 4.2%    
Drouin-Armia 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 6.7% 6.7%    
Totals   91.1% 8.9%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Armia 63.1% 63.1%    
Lehkonen-Armia 8.0% 8.0%    
Thompson-Armia 7.0% 7.0%    
Byron-Shaw 6.9% 6.9%    
Tatar-Gallagher 5.8% 0.4% 5.4%  
Others 9.3% 8.6%   0.7%
Totals   93.8% 5.4% 0.7%
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weise 71.9% 71.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 7.8% 7.8%    
Lehkonen-Armia 5.8% 5.8%    
Armia 5.2%     5.2%
Byron-Armia 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 6.2% 3.9%   2.3%
Totals   92.5%   7.5%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Thompson 87.9% 87.9%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 3.3% 3.3%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.1% 2.1%    
Kotkaniemi 2.0% 1.0%   1.0%
Tatar-Thompson 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 3.3% 2.3%   1.0%
Totals   98.0%   2.0%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 73.0% 73.0%    
Lehkonen 5.9%     5.9%
Tatar 4.6% 4.6%    
Gallagher 4.0% 4.0%    
Byron-Gallagher 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 9.2% 8.6% 0.6%  
Totals   93.4% 0.6% 5.9%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Kotkaniemi 61.0% 61.0%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 7.7% 7.7%    
Thompson-Kotkaniemi 6.8% 6.8%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 5.0% 5.0%    
Thompson 4.6%     4.6%
Others 14.9% 14.2% 0.7%  
Totals   94.7% 0.7% 4.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 62.4% 62.4%    
Domi-Shaw-Drouin 10.9%   10.9%  
Kotkaniemi-Shaw 6.8% 6.8%    
Drouin 3.9% 1.3%   2.6%
Danault-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 12.3% 12.3%    
Totals   86.5% 10.9% 2.6%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 67.5% 67.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 8.3% 8.3%    
Danault 7.3%     7.3%
Thompson-Armia 5.4% 5.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Weise 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 8.9% 7.5%   1.4%
Totals   91.3%   8.7%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Domi 73.2% 73.2%    
Domi-Byron-Drouin 9.3%   9.3%  
Byron-Kotkaniemi 5.8% 5.8%    
Tatar-Domi 4.4% 4.4%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   90.7% 9.3%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 72.4% 72.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 4.9% 0.3% 4.6%  
Danault 4.6% 4.6%    
Domi-Shaw 4.4% 4.4%    
Byron 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 10.9% 10.3% 0.6%  
Totals   94.8% 5.2%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 76.2% 76.2%    
Domi-Byron-Shaw 9.7%   9.7%  
Byron 3.5% 1.2%   2.3%
Domi-Armia 2.9% 2.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Shaw 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 5.2% 5.2%    
Totals   88.0% 9.7% 2.3%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 85.6% 78.0% 3.6% 4.1%
Folin 7.1% 6.3%   0.8%
Petry 4.5% 4.5%    
Benn 1.3% 0.6%   0.7%
  1.3% 1.3%    
Others 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   90.8% 3.6% 5.6%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 90.3% 90.3%    
Kulak 5.8% 5.8%    
Weber 1.9% 0.9%   1.0%
Petry-Folin 0.9% 0.9%    
Kulak-Petry 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   99.0%   1.0%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 84.0% 84.0%    
Petry 8.6% 2.9%   5.7%
Benn 5.3% 5.3%    
Mete 1.4% 1.4%    
Benn-Petry 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   94.3%   5.7%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 70.8% 70.8%    
Kulak 7.4% 2.5%   4.9%
  7.3%   7.3%  
Folin 6.0% 6.0%    
Weber 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   87.8% 7.3% 4.9%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 82.0% 82.0%    
Weber 9.1% 8.0%   1.1%
Petry 6.8% 6.8%    
Mete 0.9% 0.9%    
Benn-Petry 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   98.9%   1.1%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 95.8% 87.2% 4.0% 4.6%
Petry 1.9% 1.9%    
Kulak 1.2% 1.2%    
Folin 0.8% 0.8%    
Benn 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   91.4% 4.0% 4.6%
Back to main page