Game #67 - March 5, 2019 - Montreal 3 at Los Angeles 1
Game #67 - March 5, 2019
  Montreal   3   at     Los Angeles   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
41 Byron13 Domi65 Shaw
 13:07 13:07 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin43 Weal40 Armia
 12:32 12:32 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 11:47 11:47 0:00 0:00 +2
62 Lehkonen21 Thompson22 Weise
 10:43 10:43 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:32 0:14 0:00 2:18 E
21 Thompson40 Armia
 1:16 0:00 0:00 1:16 E
Others 8:03 6:12 1:25 0:26 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak26 Petry
 19:21 19:21 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
 15:32 15:32 0:00 0:00 +2
  8 Benn32 Folin
 15:07 15:07 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 3:07 0:20 0:00 2:47 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:23 1:15 0:00 0:08 E
Others 5:30 3:00 1:25 1:05 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 41PB
13MD
65AS		 92JD
43JW
40JA		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
21NT
22DW		 24PD
62AL		 17BK
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 8JB
32CF		 8JB
6SW
23 Brown - 11 Kopitar - 73 Toffoli 2:21   7:07 0:55   2:56 6:31 1:19  
14 Leipsic - 77 Carter - 17 Kovalchuk 0:57 4:10 2:15 1:53   7:22 1:01 2:06  
19 Iafallo - 9 Kempe - 76 Brodzinski 4:16 1:45 0:07 3:14   2:01 2:24 5:08  
13 Clifford - 22 Lewis - 64 Luff 2:43 0:24 0:12 1:14   1:18 1:48 1:36  
8 Doughty - 24 Forbort 2:02 2:35 5:05 1:49   3:15 6:12 3:12  
27 Martinez - 81 Roy 4:48 2:20 1:46 1:52   6:15 2:17 2:53  
3 Phaneuf - 61 Walker 2:15 3:20 0:47 3:02   4:04 1:49 3:28  
27 Martinez - 61 Walker 0:47 1:25 0:58 2:15   1:27 0:58 2:41  
8 Doughty   0:54     1:37     0:54 1:57
8 Doughty - 81 Roy 2:05 0:34 1:20 0:20   2:56 1:13 0:20  
3 Phaneuf - 24 Forbort 1:02   1:40 0:30   0:56 1:29 0:48  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 87.5% 87.5%    
Danault-Weal-Tatar 6.1%   6.1%  
Byron-Domi 2.2% 2.2%    
Tatar-Domi 1.2% 1.2%    
Domi-Danault-Tatar 1.1%   1.1%  
Others 1.9% 1.9%    
Totals   92.8% 7.2%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Shaw 84.2% 84.2%    
Byron-Shaw-Drouin 4.9% 3.4% 1.5%  
Tatar-Shaw 3.5% 3.5%    
Byron-Gallagher 1.9% 1.9%    
Danault-Shaw-Tatar 1.4%   1.4%  
Others 4.1% 3.1% 1.0%  
Totals   96.1% 3.9%  
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weise 73.7% 73.7%    
Armia 8.7%     8.7%
Lehkonen-Danault 5.0% 5.0%    
Lehkonen-Shaw 2.6% 2.6%    
Byron 2.4% 0.5%   1.9%
Others 7.6% 7.6%    
Totals   89.3%   10.7%
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Thompson 92.4% 92.4%    
Lehkonen-Danault 1.7% 1.7%    
Tatar-Thompson 1.7% 1.7%    
Drouin-Thompson 1.7% 1.7%    
Drouin-Weal 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 67.7% 67.7%    
Lehkonen 14.6% 1.3%   13.2%
Gallagher-Weal-Tatar 4.7%   4.7%  
Lehkonen-Thompson 4.2% 4.2%    
Tatar-Shaw 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 5.2% 2.2% 2.1% 0.9%
Totals   79.1% 6.8% 14.1%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Weal 85.3% 85.3%    
Thompson 8.6%     8.6%
Drouin-Thompson 2.2% 2.2%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 1.9% 1.9%    
Drouin-Domi 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 1.0%     1.0%
Totals   90.4%   9.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 87.4% 87.4%    
Domi-Shaw-Drouin 5.1% 3.6% 1.6%  
Weal-Shaw 2.9% 2.9%    
Thompson 2.3% 0.4%   1.9%
Domi-Gallagher 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   96.6% 1.6% 1.9%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 87.1% 87.1%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 5.7%   5.7%  
Byron-Shaw 3.0% 3.0%    
Drouin-Shaw 2.2% 2.2%    
Drouin-Weise 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   94.3% 5.7%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 70.4% 70.4%    
Danault 16.6% 1.5%   15.1%
Danault-Thompson 4.8% 4.8%    
Thompson-Shaw 2.5% 2.5%    
Thompson-Armia 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   84.9%   15.1%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Domi 78.9% 78.9%    
Domi-Byron-Drouin 4.6% 3.2% 1.4%  
Tatar-Danault 3.8% 3.8%    
Tatar-Domi 3.3% 3.3%    
Byron-Weal 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 6.7% 5.4% 1.3%  
Totals   97.3% 2.7%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 81.2% 81.2%    
Gallagher-Danault-Weal 5.6%   5.6%  
Danault-Shaw 4.4% 4.4%    
Domi-Shaw 3.8% 3.8%    
Domi-Danault-Shaw 1.5%   1.5%  
Others 3.6% 2.5% 1.0%  
Totals   91.8% 8.2%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weal-Armia 85.7% 85.7%    
Domi-Byron-Shaw 5.2% 3.6% 1.6%  
Weal-Shaw 2.2% 2.2%    
Thompson-Armia 2.2% 2.2%    
Thompson-Weise 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   98.4% 1.6%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 71.6% 71.6%    
Benn 14.4% 1.5%   12.8%
Petry 6.4% 5.8%   0.6%
  4.5% 2.5% 2.1%  
Benn-Petry 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   84.5% 2.1% 13.4%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 81.5% 81.5%    
Weber 16.8% 1.8%   15.0%
Petry-Weber 1.3% 1.3%    
Kulak-Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Petry 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   85.0%   15.0%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 91.6% 91.6%    
Folin 3.7% 3.7%    
Mete 3.4%     3.4%
Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Benn-Weber 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   96.6%   3.4%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 83.0% 83.0%    
Weber 5.9% 5.4%   0.6%
  4.1%   4.1%  
Folin 3.7% 3.7%    
Mete 2.1% 0.5%   1.6%
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   93.7% 4.1% 2.1%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 89.2% 89.2%    
Petry 5.1% 5.1%    
Kulak 4.6% 4.6%    
Weber 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 92.8% 92.8%    
Kulak 4.3%     4.3%
Petry 2.9% 0.7%   2.2%
Totals   93.5%   6.5%
Back to main page