Game #68 - March 7, 2019 - Montreal 2 at San Jose 5
Game #68 - March 7, 2019
  Montreal   2   at     San Jose   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 13:32 13:32 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron13 Domi65 Shaw
 13:17 13:17 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin43 Weal40 Armia
 12:04 12:04 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen21 Thompson22 Weise
 8:54 8:54 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 41 Byron - 65 Shaw - 92 Drouin 1:46 0:00 1:46 0:00 E
Others 10:27 10:13 0:14 0:00 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
53 Mete  6 Weber
 17:44 17:44 0:00 0:00 -1
17 Kulak26 Petry
 17:36 17:33 0:03 0:00 -1
  8 Benn32 Folin
 13:12 13:12 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 2:33 0:47 1:46 0:00 E
53 Mete  8 Benn
 2:00 2:00 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
 1:24 1:24 0:00 0:00 -1
53 Mete26 Petry
 1:09 1:09 0:00 0:00 E
32 Folin  6 Weber
 1:06 1:06 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:16 3:05 0:11 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 41PB
13MD
65AS		 92JD
43JW
40JA		 62AL
21NT
22DW		 53VM
6SW		 17BK
26JP		 8JB
32CF		 6SW 53VM
8JB
20 Sorensen - 19 Thornton - 62 Labanc 0:55 3:10 2:26 2:22 5:58 1:31 2:30   0:03
8 Pavelski - 39 Couture - 14 Nyquist 3:07 3:43 0:33 0:16 3:23 2:32 1:52    
27 Donskoi - 48 Hertl - 28 Meier 1:42 1:35 3:03 1:07 1:09 4:31 1:59    
18 Haley - 23 Goodrow - 68 Karlsson 2:03 0:11 3:34 2:17 1:29 2:02 3:44   1:12
8 Pavelski - 39 Couture - 28 Meier 1:14 2:30 0:33 1:44 2:12 2:32 0:58   0:24
14 Nyquist - 48 Hertl - 27 Donskoi 3:07 0:37 0:46 0:20 1:09 2:54 0:59   0:09
4 Dillon - 61 Braun 3:07 7:11 2:31 3:06 5:07 6:12 3:18   0:51
51 Simek - 88 Burns 5:55 4:24 3:15 1:26 5:39 6:18 3:17   0:16
44 Vlasic - 72 Heed 1:23 0:20 4:37 3:21 2:55 3:07 3:34   0:31
44 Vlasic - 61 Braun 0:33 0:18 0:35   1:05 0:16 0:57 1:44 0:11
44 Vlasic - 88 Burns 1:36 0:46     1:24   0:57 0:47  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 73.9% 73.9%    
Domi-Weal-Tatar-Drouin 5.4% 5.4%    
Domi-Byron-Shaw-Drouin 4.8% 4.8%    
Weal-Danault 4.1% 2.8% 1.3%  
Drouin-Weal 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 8.4% 8.4%    
Totals   98.7% 1.3%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Shaw 68.9% 68.9%    
Byron-Shaw-Drouin 9.2%   9.2%  
Gallagher-Weal-Tatar-Drouin 5.1% 5.1%    
Gallagher-Byron-Shaw-Drouin 4.6% 4.6%    
Lehkonen-Shaw 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   90.8% 9.2%  
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weise 91.4% 91.4%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 6.2% 6.2%    
Lehkonen-Shaw 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Thompson 89.7% 89.7%    
Tatar-Danault 3.7% 3.7%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.5% 2.5%    
Lehkonen-Domi 2.0% 2.0%    
Byron-Domi 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 80.5% 80.5%    
Weal-Gallagher 4.5% 3.1% 1.4%  
Tatar-Shaw 4.4% 4.4%    
Tatar-Lehkonen 3.0% 3.0%    
Tatar-Weise 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 5.6% 5.6%    
Totals   98.6% 1.4%  
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Weal 88.6% 88.6%    
Tatar-Weal 4.5% 4.5%    
Byron-Domi 2.9% 2.9%    
Byron-Weal 1.7% 1.7%    
Domi-Danault-Lehkonen-Shaw 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 79.5% 79.5%    
Domi-Shaw-Drouin 10.6%   10.6%  
Gallagher-Domi-Shaw-Drouin 5.3% 5.3%    
Domi-Armia 2.4% 2.4%    
Weal-Armia 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   89.4% 10.6%  
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 75.1% 75.1%    
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar-Drouin 6.1% 6.1%    
Danault-Gallagher 4.7% 3.2% 1.5%  
Drouin-Gallagher 3.9% 3.9%    
Tatar-Armia 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 6.3% 6.3%    
Totals   98.5% 1.5%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 74.1% 74.1%    
Domi-Shaw 6.5% 6.5%    
Thompson-Gallagher 5.0% 5.0%    
Tatar-Danault 4.2% 4.2%    
Danault-Weise 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Domi 70.5% 70.5%    
Domi-Byron-Drouin 9.4%   9.4%  
Gallagher-Domi-Byron-Drouin 4.7% 4.7%    
Lehkonen-Domi 4.2% 4.2%    
Tatar-Danault 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 7.4% 7.4%    
Totals   90.6% 9.4%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 76.6% 76.6%    
Gallagher-Domi-Weal-Drouin 5.6% 5.6%    
Danault-Shaw 4.2% 4.2%    
Weal-Armia 3.5% 3.5%    
Danault-Lehkonen 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 7.4% 7.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weal-Armia 70.3% 70.3%    
Domi-Byron-Shaw 10.3%   10.3%  
Gallagher-Domi-Weal-Tatar 5.7% 5.7%    
Gallagher-Domi-Byron-Shaw 5.1% 5.1%    
Weal-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   89.7% 10.3%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 77.3% 77.3%    
  11.1% 3.4% 7.7%  
Folin 4.8% 4.8%    
Kulak 3.4% 3.4%    
Benn 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 1.3% 0.5% 0.8%  
Totals   91.5% 8.5%  
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 81.3% 81.3%    
Mete 12.3% 12.3%    
Weber 3.0% 3.0%    
Petry 2.8% 2.8%    
Kulak 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 95.2% 95.0% 0.3%  
Weber 4.2% 4.2%    
Benn 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   99.7% 0.3%  
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 82.1% 81.8% 0.2%  
  6.5% 6.5%    
Mete 5.4% 5.4%    
Folin 2.6% 2.6%    
Benn 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 1.4% 0.5% 0.9%  
Totals   98.9% 1.1%  
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 85.4% 85.4%    
Weber 7.1% 7.1%    
Mete 3.9% 3.9%    
Petry 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 82.5% 82.5%    
Benn 9.3% 9.3%    
Petry 5.4% 5.4%    
Folin 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page