Game #74 - March 21, 2019 - N.Y. Islanders 0 at Montreal 4
Game #74 - March 21, 2019
  N.Y. Islanders   0   at     Montreal   4

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
62 Lehkonen13 Domi65 Shaw
12:44 12:44 0:00 0:00 +1
41 Byron21 Thompson43 Weal
10:01 10:01 0:00 0:00 +1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
9:46 9:46 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
8:48 8:48 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
2:57 0:13 0:00 2:44 E
21 Thompson40 Armia
1:29 0:00 0:00 1:29 E
15 Kotkaniemi - 40 Armia - 43 Weal - 92 Drouin 1:21 0:00 1:21 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen21 Thompson43 Weal
1:07 1:07 0:00 0:00 E
Others 11:47 9:20 1:01 1:26 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak26 Petry
16:53 16:53 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
15:44 15:41 0:03 0:00 +1
  8 Benn32 Folin
13:51 13:30 0:00 0:21 +2
  8 Benn  6 Weber
3:19 0:14 0:00 3:05 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
1:40 0:35 0:00 1:05 E
53 Mete32 Folin
1:24 0:34 0:00 0:50 E
  6 Weber
1:21 0:00 1:21 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
1:15 1:00 0:15 0:00 E
53 Mete26 Petry
1:03 0:42 0:05 0:16 E
Others 3:30 2:50 0:38 0:02 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 62AL
13MD
65AS
41PB
21NT
43JW
90TT
24PD
11BG
92JD
15JK
40JA
24PD
62AL
17BK
26JP
53VM
6SW
8JB
32CF
8JB
6SW
16 Ladd - 29 Nelson - 12 Bailey 8:05 0:42 1:49 0:26   3:57 5:57 2:03  
7 Eberle - 13 Barzal - 27 Lee 1:33 1:00 6:23 0:31   7:23 2:50 0:35  
17 Martin - 53 Cizikas - 15 Clutterbuck 0:50 6:54 0:05 0:55   1:12 2:54 4:24  
18 Beauvillier - 11 Fritz - 47 Komarov 0:10 0:31 0:47 5:28   1:17 1:55 4:38 0:10
3 Pelech - 6 Pulock 3:52 4:48 3:35 1:46   4:51 6:46 2:44  
2 Leddy - 24 Mayfield 3:46 2:50 2:03 4:56   5:47 3:19 6:13 0:10
4 Hickey - 25 Toews 3:34 1:13 3:14 1:32   4:19 2:18 4:11  
25 Toews         1:19       1:59
6 Pulock - 25 Toews 0:47 0:08 0:17 0:02 0:33 0:20 0:58 0:02 0:10
2 Leddy - 6 Pulock         0:56   0:22 0:07 1:00

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 73.6% 73.6%    
Byron-Danault 6.2% 6.2%    
Domi-Shaw-Tatar 5.5% 0.8% 4.8%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 4.1% 4.1%    
Tatar-Weal 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 7.7% 4.8% 2.9%  
Totals   92.3% 7.7%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Shaw 83.7% 83.7%    
Byron-Shaw 6.1% 6.1%    
Gallagher-Shaw-Tatar 4.8% 0.7% 4.2%  
Byron-Weal 2.0% 2.0%    
Drouin-Shaw 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 1.9% 1.0% 0.9%  
Totals   95.0% 5.0%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 66.7% 66.7%    
Armia-Weal-Drouin 10.2%   10.2%  
Drouin-Weal 6.8% 6.8%    
Byron-Armia 5.6% 5.6%    
Tatar-Armia 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 5.8% 5.8%    
Totals   89.8% 10.2%  
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weal 68.1% 68.1%    
Armia 10.1%     10.1%
Lehkonen-Weal 7.6% 7.6%    
Lehkonen 5.2%     5.2%
Byron-Armia 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 6.1% 6.1%    
Totals   84.7%   15.3%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 60.1% 60.1%    
Lehkonen 18.2% 1.3%   16.8%
Byron-Gallagher 5.0% 5.0%    
Tatar-Shaw 4.3% 4.3%    
Lehkonen-Shaw 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 9.8% 5.7%   4.1%
Totals   79.1%   20.9%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 62.6% 62.6%    
Thompson 10.5%     10.5%
Kotkaniemi-Weal-Drouin 9.6%   9.6%  
Byron-Kotkaniemi 5.2% 5.2%    
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 7.5% 5.5%   2.0%
Totals   77.8% 9.6% 12.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weal 72.7% 72.7%    
Domi-Shaw 6.8% 6.8%    
Danault-Gallagher 5.9% 5.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 5.3% 5.3%    
Thompson-Armia 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 6.3% 6.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Thompson 67.5% 67.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Drouin 9.1%   9.1%  
Lehkonen-Thompson 7.5% 7.5%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 6.1% 6.1%    
Drouin-Thompson 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 7.1% 7.1%    
Totals   90.9% 9.1%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 69.6% 69.6%    
Danault 16.1% 1.2%   14.9%
Thompson-Weal 6.1% 6.1%    
Thompson 4.2%     4.2%
Danault-Shaw 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   80.9%   19.1%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 77.1% 77.1%    
Byron-Domi 5.7% 5.7%    
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar 4.4% 0.6% 3.8%  
Tatar-Danault 4.2% 4.2%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 6.1% 3.7% 2.3%  
Totals   93.8% 6.2%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 72.6% 72.6%    
Gallagher-Domi-Shaw 5.5% 0.7% 4.7%  
Danault-Shaw 5.2% 5.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 4.8% 4.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 4.1% 4.1%    
Others 7.8% 5.9% 1.9%  
Totals   93.4% 6.6%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 71.8% 71.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia-Weal 11.0%   11.0%  
Kotkaniemi-Weal 7.3% 7.3%    
Thompson-Weal 3.3% 3.3%    
Danault-Gallagher 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 3.9% 3.9%    
Totals   89.0% 11.0%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 69.6% 69.4% 0.2%  
Benn 14.7% 1.0%   13.6%
  6.0%   6.0%  
Petry 5.5% 4.4% 1.1%  
Folin 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   79.1% 7.3% 13.6%
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 71.8% 69.9%   1.8%
Weber 17.2% 1.2%   16.0%
Petry 8.6% 3.0%   5.6%
Petry-Weber 1.1% 1.1%    
Kulak 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.5% 0.3%   0.2%
Totals   76.4%   23.6%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 93.3% 93.3%    
Folin 5.3% 5.3%    
Benn 0.8% 0.8%    
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Mete 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 75.4% 75.4%    
Benn 7.4% 2.6%   4.8%
Weber 5.6% 4.5% 1.1%  
Mete 4.7% 3.1% 0.4% 1.2%
Folin 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 3.9% 1.0% 2.8% 0.1%
Totals   89.5% 4.3% 6.2%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 78.8% 76.8%   2.0%
Mete 8.0% 3.2%   4.7%
Kulak 5.5% 5.5%    
Weber 3.8% 3.8%    
Petry 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 0.2%     0.2%
Totals   93.1%   6.9%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 86.1% 85.8% 0.3%  
Folin 7.7% 3.1%   4.6%
Petry 5.7% 3.8% 0.5% 1.5%
Benn 0.4% 0.4%    
Kulak 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   93.3% 0.7% 6.0%

Back to main page