Game #80 - April 2, 2019 - Tampa Bay 2 at Montreal 4
Game #80 - April 2, 2019
  Tampa Bay   2   at     Montreal   4
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
62 Lehkonen13 Domi65 Shaw
 12:13 12:13 0:00 0:00 +1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 12:05 12:05 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin43 Weal40 Armia
 10:52 10:52 0:00 0:00 -1
15 Kotkaniemi21 Thompson41 Byron
 8:54 8:54 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault - 40 Armia - 43 Weal - 92 Drouin 1:44 0:00 1:44 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 13 Domi - 65 Shaw - 90 Tatar 1:23 0:00 1:23 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
Others 11:45 10:52 0:53 0:00 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak26 Petry
 18:31 18:31 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
 16:15 16:15 0:00 0:00 +1
  8 Benn32 Folin
 11:47 11:47 0:00 0:00 +1
  8 Benn  6 Weber
 2:27 2:27 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 1:58 0:00 1:58 0:00 E
17 Kulak  6 Weber
 1:37 1:37 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
 1:23 0:00 1:23 0:00 E
53 Mete  8 Benn
 1:15 1:15 0:00 0:00 -1
26 Petry32 Folin
 1:13 1:10 0:03 0:00 E
Others 3:34 2:58 0:36 0:00 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 62AL
13MD
65AS		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 92JD
43JW
40JA		 15JK
21NT
41PB		 17BK
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 8JB
32CF		 8JB
6SW
37 Gourde - 21 Point - 86 Kucherov 2:12 8:19 0:35 0:53 9:00 3:11 1:05 0:19
73 Erne - 13 Paquette - 10 Miller 0:24 0:33 1:33 3:58 0:56 0:16 4:03  
18 Palat - 71 Cirelli - 17 Killorn 0:52 0:22 0:29 1:09 0:26 0:47 1:44  
9 Johnson - 71 Cirelli - 17 Killorn 1:04 0:26 1:25 0:01 1:49 0:01 1:22  
17 Killorn - 71 Cirelli - 91 Stamkos 0:46 0:40 1:02   0:47 2:17    
18 Palat - 9 Johnson - 7 Joseph 0:27 0:08 1:07 0:16 1:01 1:24 0:29  
9 Johnson - 91 Stamkos - 7 Joseph 1:57   0:55   0:03 2:42    
18 Palat - 91 Stamkos - 10 Miller     1:36 0:03 0:33 0:59 0:20  
27 McDonagh - 81 Cernak 4:06 2:48 3:39 1:58 3:33 5:58 2:45 0:24
6 Stralman - 98 Sergachev 3:16 5:42 2:43 1:07 6:55 4:33 2:40 0:33
44 Rutta - 55 Coburn 2:41 0:44 1:59 4:57 3:07 2:49 4:19  
6 Stralman - 55 Coburn 0:42 0:51 0:33 0:11 2:06 0:07    
44 Rutta - 98 Sergachev 0:59 0:30   0:38 0:47 0:14 1:09  
6 Stralman - 27 McDonagh   0:25 1:15 0:03 0:11 0:58 0:34 0:06

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 71.0% 71.0%    
Domi-Shaw-Tatar 8.1%   8.1%  
Lehkonen-Danault 5.0% 5.0%    
Drouin-Danault 4.0% 4.0%    
Shaw-Domi 2.7% 0.4% 2.4%  
Others 9.1% 6.6% 2.5%  
Totals   87.0% 13.0%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Shaw 74.4% 74.4%    
Gallagher-Shaw-Tatar 8.4%   8.4%  
Tatar-Shaw 5.4% 5.1% 0.3%  
Shaw-Gallagher 2.8% 0.4% 2.4%  
Gallagher-Shaw-Drouin 1.4%   1.4%  
Others 7.5% 6.3% 1.2%  
Totals   86.2% 13.8%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Byron 82.3% 82.3%    
Weal-Byron 6.8% 6.8%    
Danault-Byron 3.9% 3.9%    
Thompson-Shaw 3.2% 3.2%    
Weal-Armia 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 2.0% 2.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Byron 85.3% 85.3%    
Armia 8.9% 8.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Shaw 3.4% 3.4%    
Domi-Byron 2.1% 2.1%    
Lehkonen-Shaw 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 63.3% 63.3%    
Armia-Weal-Drouin 9.1%   9.1%  
Lehkonen 5.6% 5.6%    
Tatar-Shaw 4.5% 4.5%    
Lehkonen-Gallagher 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 13.1% 13.1%    
Totals   90.9% 9.1%  
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Weal 74.3% 74.3%    
Danault-Weal-Drouin 11.8%   11.8%  
Thompson 6.4% 6.4%    
Tatar-Danault 1.8% 1.8%    
Drouin-Danault 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 4.0% 4.0%    
Totals   88.2% 11.8%  
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Thompson 82.4% 82.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 6.8% 6.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault 3.9% 3.9%    
Domi-Thompson 2.0% 2.0%    
Drouin-Weal 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 3.4% 3.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 67.9% 67.9%    
Danault-Armia-Drouin 10.8%   10.8%  
Tatar-Drouin 4.9% 4.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Byron 4.6% 4.6%    
Lehkonen-Shaw 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 9.1% 9.1%    
Totals   89.2% 10.8%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 81.7% 81.7%    
Danault 7.1% 7.1%    
Danault-Gallagher 5.7% 5.7%    
Weal-Shaw 2.9% 2.9%    
Domi-Byron 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 67.9% 67.9%    
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar 7.7%   7.7%  
Tatar-Domi 4.9% 4.6% 0.3%  
Tatar-Danault 4.8% 4.8%    
Danault-Tatar-Drouin 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 11.2% 6.6% 4.6%  
Totals   87.4% 12.6%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 67.1% 67.1%    
Gallagher-Domi-Shaw 7.7%   7.7%  
Domi-Shaw 4.9% 4.6% 0.3%  
Danault-Shaw 4.8% 4.8%    
Weal-Drouin 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 11.1% 10.0% 1.1%  
Totals   90.9% 9.1%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weal-Armia 67.0% 67.0%    
Danault-Armia-Weal 10.7%   10.7%  
Tatar-Weal 4.8% 4.8%    
Danault-Gallagher 4.2% 4.2%    
Danault-Shaw-Tatar 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 9.5% 6.8% 2.7%  
Totals   86.6% 13.4%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 68.3% 68.3%    
Benn 10.3% 10.3%    
  8.3%   8.3%  
Kulak 6.8% 6.8%    
Folin 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 2.5% 0.8% 1.7%  
Totals   90.0% 10.0%  
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 71.8% 71.8%    
Weber 14.9% 14.9%    
Mete 7.6% 7.6%    
Kulak 4.9% 4.9%    
Petry 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 85.1% 85.1%    
Weber 7.4% 7.4%    
Mete 3.8% 3.8%    
Benn 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 84.7% 84.7%    
  6.3%   6.3%  
Folin 5.6% 5.3% 0.2%  
Weber 2.7% 0.9% 1.8%  
Benn 0.5% 0.5%    
Others 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   91.6% 8.4%  
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 84.3% 84.3%    
Petry 8.7% 8.3% 0.4%  
Weber 6.4% 6.4%    
Mete 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   99.6% 0.4%  
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 88.1% 88.1%    
Benn 6.8% 6.8%    
Kulak 4.5% 4.5%    
Folin 0.5% 0.5%    
Petry 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page