Game #81 - April 4, 2019 - Montreal 1 at Washington 2
Game #81 - April 4, 2019
  Montreal   1   at     Washington   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 16:12 16:12 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin43 Weal40 Armia
 13:23 13:23 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi65 Shaw
 12:07 12:07 0:00 0:00 E
15 Kotkaniemi21 Thompson41 Byron
 7:36 7:36 0:00 0:00 -2
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:14 0:00 0:00 1:14 E
Others 9:28 8:07 0:35 0:46 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak26 Petry
 21:14 21:14 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
 18:18 18:18 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Benn32 Folin
 13:16 13:16 0:00 0:00 -2
53 Mete32 Folin
 1:29 0:17 0:00 1:12 E
  6 Weber
 1:23 0:48 0:35 0:00 E
  8 Benn26 Petry
 1:06 0:18 0:00 0:48 E
Others 3:14 3:14 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 92JD
43JW
40JA		 62AL
13MD
65AS		 15JK
21NT
41PB		 17BK
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 8JB
32CF
13 Vrana - 92 Kuznetsov - 77 Oshie 7:56 3:00 2:35 0:08 5:56 7:03 0:52
8 Ovechkin - 19 Backstrom - 43 Wilson 4:02 4:10 4:07 0:30 7:05 3:17 1:53
62 Hagelin - 20 Eller - 10 Connolly 1:08 4:30 2:55 3:23 2:36 2:56 7:03
65 Burakovsky - 26 Dowd - 72 Boyd 1:58 0:35 0:45 3:17 1:46 3:00 2:17
2 Niskanen - 9 Orlov 6:56 2:35 5:08 2:24 5:26 10:04 2:58
3 Jensen - 74 Carlson 5:25 2:19 4:19 0:17 7:21 3:08 2:25
29 Djoos - 44 Orpik 1:31 5:30 0:03 2:22 1:45 3:03 5:34
44 Orpik - 74 Carlson 1:30 0:15 1:35 0:01 3:09 0:10  
29 Djoos - 74 Carlson   1:03   1:03 1:09   0:58

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 84.2% 84.2%    
Domi-Danault-Tatar-Drouin 5.1% 5.1%    
Kotkaniemi-Thompson 3.3% 3.3%    
Domi-Weal-Shaw 2.3% 2.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Shaw 76.2% 76.2%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar-Drouin 6.2% 6.2%    
Drouin-Shaw 4.3% 4.3%    
Lehkonen-Byron 3.0% 3.0%    
Gallagher-Weal-Shaw 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 7.4% 7.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Byron 76.5% 76.5%    
Thompson-Gallagher 6.4% 6.4%    
Danault-Byron 4.4% 4.4%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Weal-Byron 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 6.2% 6.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Byron 84.1% 84.1%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 7.0% 7.0%    
Armia 6.6%     6.6%
Kotkaniemi-Armia 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   93.4%   6.6%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 77.5% 77.5%    
Lehkonen 5.9%     5.9%
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar-Drouin 4.7% 4.7%    
Armia-Weal-Drouin 2.8%   2.8%  
Lehkonen-Shaw 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 6.6% 5.8%   0.8%
Totals   90.5% 2.8% 6.7%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Weal 80.4% 80.4%    
Thompson 3.6%     3.6%
Danault-Weal-Drouin 3.5%   3.5%  
Lehkonen-Weal 1.9% 1.9%    
Shaw-Weal 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 8.9% 7.9%   1.0%
Totals   91.9% 3.5% 4.6%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Thompson 84.6% 84.6%    
Lehkonen-Domi 5.4% 5.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault 4.8% 4.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 3.2% 3.2%    
Drouin-Weal 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 82.4% 82.4%    
Danault-Armia-Drouin 3.6%   3.6%  
Gallagher-Domi-Shaw 2.8% 2.8%    
Lehkonen-Armia 1.9% 1.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Byron 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 7.6% 7.6%    
Totals   96.4% 3.6%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Shaw 80.2% 80.2%    
Danault 8.2%     8.2%
Danault-Shaw 3.5% 3.5%    
Domi-Byron 3.2% 3.2%    
Weal-Armia 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 2.9% 2.9%    
Totals   91.8%   8.2%
65 Shaw
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 82.1% 82.1%    
Drouin-Domi 4.6% 4.6%    
Lehkonen-Danault 3.6% 3.6%    
Gallagher-Domi-Weal 3.0% 3.0%    
Weal-Armia 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 4.7% 4.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 91.4% 91.4%    
Gallagher-Domi-Danault-Drouin 5.6% 5.6%    
Danault-Armia 1.4% 1.4%    
Domi-Shaw 1.0% 1.0%    
Domi-Gallagher 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weal-Armia 81.7% 81.7%    
Gallagher-Domi-Danault-Tatar 6.0% 6.0%    
Domi-Shaw 4.2% 4.2%    
Danault-Armia-Weal 3.6%   3.6%  
Domi-Armia 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 3.6% 3.6%    
Totals   96.4% 3.6%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 85.1% 85.1%    
  6.4% 3.7% 2.7%  
Petry 4.3% 4.3%    
Folin 1.6% 1.6%    
Kulak 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   97.3% 2.7%  
8 Benn
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 92.3% 92.3%    
Petry 7.7% 2.1%   5.6%
Totals   94.4%   5.6%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 96.5% 96.5%    
Weber 1.5% 1.5%    
Mete 1.5% 1.5%    
Folin 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 87.6% 87.6%    
Benn 4.5% 1.2%   3.3%
Weber 3.8% 3.8%    
Folin 2.1% 2.1%    
Mete 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   96.7%   3.3%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Benn 83.4% 83.4%    
Mete 9.3% 1.8%   7.5%
Petry 3.2% 3.2%    
Weber 2.2% 2.2%    
Mete-Weber 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   92.5%   7.5%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 88.8% 88.8%    
Folin 7.2% 1.4%   5.8%
Kulak 1.6% 1.6%    
Petry 1.4% 1.4%    
Folin-Weber 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   94.2%   5.8%
Back to main page