Game #04 - August 7, 2020 - Pittsburgh 0 at Montreal 2

Game #04 - August 7, 2020

Pittsburgh

Montreal

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.

NHL.com links:

Scoresheet Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play

Lines and defensive pairings

Line

Time

+/-

41 Byron

24 Danault

62 Lehkonen

13:22

13:16

0:06

0:00

90 Tatar

14 Suzuki

11 Gallagher

12:43

12:43

0:00

92 Drouin

15 Kotkaniemi

40 Armia

11:10

11:10

0:00

22 Weise

13 Domi

60 Belzile

7:13

7:13

0:00

11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 90 Tatar - 92 Drouin

1:42

0:00

1:42

0:00

13 Domi - 15 Kotkaniemi - 24 Danault - 40 Armia

1:36

0:00

1:36

0:00

24 Danault

62 Lehkonen

1:18

0:00

1:18

Others

10:56

7:38

0:36

2:42

Pair

Time

+/-

8 Chiarot

6 Weber

19:33

17:14

0:00

2:19

77 Kulak

26 Petry

18:22

18:22

0:00

61 Ouellet

53 Mete

10:16

10:16

0:00

61 Ouellet

26 Petry

2:48

1:31

0:00

1:17

26 Petry

2:07

0:01

2:06

0:00

6 Weber

1:48

0:00

1:48

0:00

Others

5:06

4:36

0:06

0:24

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair	41PB 24PD 62AL	90TT 14NS 11BG	92JD 15JK 40JA	22DW 13MD 60AB	8BC 6SW	77BK 26JP	61XO 53VM	61XO 26JP	26JP
16 Zucker - 71 Malkin - 72 Hornqvist	5:34	1:44	2:00	0:04	7:59	2:18	0:17
59 Guentzel - 87 Crosby - 17 Rust	1:22	6:01	0:05	0:36	1:05	6:34		0:20
13 Tanev - 53 Blueger - 46 Aston-Reese	1:19		3:24	2:38	1:39	1:08	4:32
43 Sheary - 19 McCann - 12 Marleau	0:32	0:35	2:30	1:59	1:06	0:42	3:11	0:26
43 Sheary - 87 Crosby - 59 Guentzel	1:12	2:18	0:55		0:04	4:39
59 Guentzel - 71 Malkin - 87 Crosby - 72 Hornqvist	1:11				3:11			0:03
13 Tanev - 53 Blueger					0:10				1:17
12 Marleau - 19 McCann - 17 Rust	0:11	0:04	0:54	1:12	0:14	1:20	1:04

8 Dumoulin - 58 Letang	4:20	4:04	3:32	2:01	4:41	8:08	0:50	1:04	0:30
6 Marino - 28 Pettersson	3:59	3:39	0:58	1:03	3:14	4:54	2:17	0:09	0:30
3 Johnson - 4 Schultz	1:43	2:01	3:18	2:35	3:34	1:45	3:56
3 Johnson - 58 Letang		0:51	0:01	0:56	1:33	0:09	0:29		0:46
4 Schultz - 8 Dumoulin	0:28	0:43	1:27		0:28	1:21	1:27
3 Johnson - 6 Marino	0:37	0:08	0:38	0:11	0:23	0:19	0:44		0:20
4 Schultz - 6 Marino	0:32	0:20			1:06			1:00

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Tatar-Suzuki	77.4%	77.4%
Suzuki-Tatar-Drouin	10.3%		10.3%
Lehkonen-Suzuki	5.4%	5.4%
Tatar-Danault	2.5%	2.5%
Suzuki-Belzile	2.4%	2.4%
Others	1.9%	1.9%
Totals		89.7%	10.3%

13 Domi

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Weise-Belzile	75.8%	75.8%
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Armia	16.8%		16.8%
Tatar-Weise	2.5%	2.5%
Byron-Lehkonen	2.5%	2.5%
Gallagher-Belzile	1.1%	1.1%
Others	1.4%	1.4%
Totals		83.2%	16.8%

14 Suzuki

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Tatar-Gallagher	62.7%	62.7%
Gallagher-Tatar-Drouin	8.4%		8.4%
Lehkonen-Gallagher	4.4%	4.4%
Drouin-Armia	3.3%	3.3%
Danault-Tatar-Drouin	3.0%	0.1%	3.0%
Others	18.2%	10.8%		7.4%
Totals		81.3%	11.3%	7.4%

15 Kotkaniemi

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Drouin-Armia	75.5%	75.5%
Domi-Danault-Armia	10.8%		10.8%
Byron-Lehkonen	5.2%	5.2%
Drouin-Byron	2.7%	2.7%
Weise-Belzile	1.9%	1.9%
Others	3.8%	3.8%
Totals		89.2%	10.8%

22 Weise

Linemates	Total	EV
Domi-Belzile	85.7%	85.7%
Suzuki-Lehkonen	3.6%	3.6%
Kotkaniemi-Belzile	3.4%	3.4%
Tatar-Domi	2.8%	2.8%
Danault-Lehkonen	1.6%	1.6%
Others	3.0%	3.0%
Totals		100.0%

24 Danault

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Byron-Lehkonen	67.3%	66.8%	0.5%
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Armia	8.1%		8.1%
Lehkonen	6.5%			6.5%
Byron	4.2%			4.2%
Suzuki-Tatar-Drouin	3.1%	0.1%	3.0%
Others	10.7%	8.6%		2.1%
Totals		75.6%	11.6%	12.8%

40 Armia

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Drouin-Kotkaniemi	72.7%	72.7%
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Danault	10.4%		10.4%
Drouin-Suzuki	4.3%	4.3%
Suzuki	3.7%			3.7%
Tatar-Suzuki	3.1%	3.1%
Others	5.7%	5.7%
Totals		85.9%	10.4%	3.7%

41 Byron

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Danault-Lehkonen	80.6%	80.0%	0.6%
Danault	5.0%			5.0%
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen	4.6%	4.6%
Drouin-Kotkaniemi	2.4%	2.4%
Lehkonen	2.2%			2.2%
Others	5.1%	3.3%		1.8%
Totals		90.4%	0.6%	9.0%

60 Belzile

Linemates	Total	EV
Weise-Domi	86.3%	86.3%
Gallagher-Suzuki	4.8%	4.8%
Weise-Kotkaniemi	3.4%	3.4%
Kotkaniemi-Armia	1.6%	1.6%
Weise-Danault	1.2%	1.2%
Others	2.8%	2.8%
Totals		100.0%

62 Lehkonen

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Byron-Danault	70.5%	70.0%	0.5%
Danault	6.9%			6.9%
Suzuki-Gallagher	4.7%	4.7%
Byron-Kotkaniemi	4.0%	4.0%
Suzuki-Danault	2.8%	2.8%
Others	11.1%	8.0%		3.1%
Totals		89.5%	0.5%	9.9%

90 Tatar

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Suzuki-Gallagher	77.5%	77.5%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Drouin	10.4%		10.4%
Suzuki-Danault-Drouin	3.8%	0.1%	3.7%
Suzuki-Armia	2.9%	2.9%
Danault-Gallagher	2.5%	2.5%
Others	2.9%	2.9%
Totals		86.0%	14.0%

92 Drouin

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Kotkaniemi-Armia	74.6%	74.6%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar	11.4%		11.4%
Suzuki-Armia	4.5%	4.5%
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar	4.1%	0.1%	4.0%
Kotkaniemi-Byron	2.7%	2.7%
Others	2.8%	2.8%
Totals		84.6%	15.4%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Chiarot	86.9%	76.6%		10.3%
	8.0%		8.0%
Petry	2.8%	1.0%		1.8%
Kulak	1.7%	1.7%
Ouellet	0.6%	0.6%
Totals		79.9%	8.0%	12.1%

8 Chiarot

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Weber	86.7%	76.4%		10.3%
Kulak	3.9%	3.9%
Mete	3.3%	3.3%
Ouellet	3.2%	3.2%
Petry	2.9%	2.4%	0.4%
Totals		89.3%	0.4%	10.3%

26 Petry

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Kulak	74.4%	74.4%
Ouellet	11.3%	6.1%		5.2%
	8.6%	0.1%	8.5%
Chiarot	2.6%	2.2%	0.4%
Weber	2.6%	0.9%		1.6%
Others	0.5%	0.5%
Totals		84.3%	8.9%	6.8%

53 Mete

Partner	Total	EV
Ouellet	92.1%	92.1%
Chiarot	6.7%	6.7%
Petry	1.2%	1.2%
Totals		100.0%

61 Ouellet

Partner	Total	EV	SH
Mete	69.7%	69.7%
Petry	19.0%	10.3%	8.7%
Kulak	5.5%	5.5%
Chiarot	4.9%	4.9%
Weber	0.9%	0.9%
Totals		91.3%	8.7%

77 Kulak

Partner	Total	EV
Petry	89.8%	89.8%
Chiarot	4.3%	4.3%
Ouellet	4.0%	4.0%
Weber	1.9%	1.9%
Totals		100.0%

Back to main page