Game #05 - August 12, 2020 - Montreal 1 at Philadelphia 2
Game #05 - August 12, 2020
  Montreal   1   at     Philadelphia   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
62 Lehkonen24 Danault41 Byron
 11:14 11:14 0:00 0:00 -1
90 Tatar14 Suzuki11 Gallagher
 9:37 9:37 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 8:25 8:25 0:00 0:00 E
22 Weise13 Domi60 Belzile
 6:33 6:33 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:46 1:15 0:00 1:31 E
92 Drouin15 Kotkaniemi13 Domi
 1:49 1:49 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin14 Suzuki11 Gallagher
 1:16 0:22 0:54 0:00 E
24 Danault
 1:14 0:00 0:00 1:14 E
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 E
Others 16:03 12:36 0:00 3:27 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
77 Kulak26 Petry
 17:56 17:56 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 16:48 14:19 0:00 2:29 E
61 Ouellet53 Mete
 11:52 11:52 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 3:34 2:04 0:54 0:36 E
61 Ouellet26 Petry
 1:52 0:29 0:00 1:23 E
  8 Chiarot77 Kulak
 1:44 1:44 0:00 0:00 -1
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 1:24 1:24 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot61 Ouellet
 1:14 1:14 0:00 0:00 E
Others 3:36 1:52 0:00 1:44 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 62AL
24PD
41PB		 90TT
14NS
11BG		 92JD
15JK
40JA		 22DW
13MD
60AB		 24PD
62AL		 77BK
26JP		 8BC
6SW		 61XO
53VM		 26JP
6SW
49 Farabee - 28 Giroux - 14 Couturier 4:26 2:02 0:26 2:07   3:57 4:29 0:41 0:05
21 Laughton - 13 Hayes - 11 Konecny 1:52 2:43 0:51 0:57   4:32 1:35 0:52 0:05
62 Aube-Kubel - 38 Grant - 93 Voracek 0:52 1:39 3:34 1:35   2:55 2:21 3:30 0:18
25 Van Riemsdyk - 44 Thompson - 18 Pitlick 1:28 0:26 2:00 0:57   1:38 1:07 3:33  
9 Provorov - 15 Niskanen 6:09 2:17 1:55 1:54 1:15 6:23 4:21 1:54 1:53
5 Myers - 6 Sanheim 2:53 4:28 0:57 1:37   6:16 4:26 2:25 0:05
53 Gostisbehere - 61 Braun 0:57 1:22 3:42 2:17   2:29 3:19 5:14 0:18
9 Provorov         1:31   2:08   0:32
15 Niskanen - 53 Gostisbehere   0:16 0:02 0:01   0:11 0:49 0:18  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Suzuki 58.5% 58.5%    
Drouin-Suzuki 7.7% 2.2% 5.5%  
Tatar-Danault 6.4% 6.4%    
Tatar-Domi 5.8% 2.0%   3.7%
Suzuki-Belzile 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 17.5% 17.5%    
Totals   90.8% 5.5% 3.7%
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weise-Belzile 46.5% 46.5%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 12.9% 12.9%    
Tatar-Gallagher 6.7% 2.4%   4.4%
Belzile-Armia 5.0% 5.0%    
Suzuki-Danault-Drouin 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 24.1% 23.4%   0.7%
Totals   94.9%   5.1%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 54.5% 54.5%    
Drouin-Gallagher 7.2% 2.1% 5.1%  
Drouin 4.4% 4.4%    
Lehkonen 3.9% 2.3%   1.6%
Gallagher-Belzile 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 26.1% 19.3%   6.8%
Totals   86.5% 5.1% 8.4%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 66.5% 66.5%    
Drouin-Domi 14.4% 14.4%    
Belzile-Armia 4.2% 4.2%    
Tatar-Domi 3.4% 3.4%    
Domi-Gallagher 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 8.8% 8.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Belzile 87.1% 87.1%    
Kotkaniemi-Belzile 3.8% 3.8%    
Lehkonen-Domi 3.1% 3.1%    
Suzuki-Belzile 2.7% 2.7%    
Tatar-Domi 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Byron 53.5% 53.5%    
Lehkonen 13.2% 6.0%   7.2%
  5.9%     5.9%
Tatar-Gallagher 5.0% 5.0%    
Byron 3.3% 1.0%   2.4%
Others 19.1% 18.2%   0.9%
Totals   83.6%   16.4%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 71.2% 71.2%    
Byron 6.5%     6.5%
Belzile-Domi 5.9% 5.9%    
Belzile-Kotkaniemi 4.5% 4.5%    
Drouin-Suzuki 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 7.3% 3.4%   3.9%
Totals   89.6%   10.4%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Danault 72.6% 72.6%    
Armia 5.0%     5.0%
Danault 4.5% 1.3%   3.2%
Drouin-Danault 3.8% 3.8%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 10.7% 7.3%   3.3%
Totals   88.5%   11.5%
60 Belzile
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Weise-Domi 70.9% 70.9%    
Domi-Armia 7.6% 7.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki 7.4% 7.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 5.8% 5.8%    
Weise-Kotkaniemi 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 5.2% 5.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Byron 66.5% 66.5%    
Danault 16.4% 7.4%   9.0%
Suzuki 4.0% 2.4%   1.7%
Suzuki-Byron 3.2% 3.2%    
Danault-Armia 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 7.5% 7.0%   0.5%
Totals   88.8%   11.2%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Gallagher 73.6% 73.6%    
Danault-Gallagher 8.0% 8.0%    
Domi-Gallagher 7.3% 2.6%   4.7%
Kotkaniemi-Domi 3.3% 3.3%    
Domi-Byron 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 5.4% 5.4%    
Totals   95.3%   4.7%
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 56.2% 56.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Domi 12.1% 12.1%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 8.5% 2.4% 6.0%  
Suzuki 5.2% 5.2%    
Domi-Suzuki-Danault 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 13.6% 13.6%    
Totals   94.0% 6.0%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 77.3% 65.9%   11.4%
Petry 16.4% 9.5% 4.1% 2.8%
Chiarot-Ouellet 2.0% 2.0%    
Chiarot-Petry 1.5% 1.5%    
Kulak 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.5% 0.5%   1.0%
Totals   80.7% 4.1% 15.2%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 75.9% 64.7%   11.2%
Kulak 7.8% 7.8%    
Petry 6.3% 6.3%    
Ouellet 5.6% 5.6%    
Ouellet-Weber 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   88.8%   11.2%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 70.1% 70.1%    
Weber 13.9% 8.1% 3.5% 2.3%
Ouellet 7.3% 1.9%   5.4%
Chiarot 5.5% 5.5%    
Mete 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   88.7% 3.5% 7.8%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Ouellet 89.1% 89.1%    
  4.6%     4.6%
Petry 3.8% 3.8%    
Chiarot 1.6% 1.6%    
Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   95.4%   4.6%
61 Ouellet
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 71.8% 71.8%    
Petry 11.3% 2.9%   8.4%
Chiarot 7.5% 7.5%    
Kulak 5.4%     5.4%
Chiarot-Weber 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 1.3%     1.3%
Totals   84.9%   15.1%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 86.0% 86.0%    
Chiarot 8.3% 8.3%    
Ouellet 4.3%     4.3%
Weber 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   95.7%   4.3%
Back to main page