Game #01 - October 3, 2019 - Montreal 3 at Carolina 4 (SO)
Game #01 - October 3, 2019
  Montreal   3   at     Carolina   4     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 10:35 10:35 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
 9:01 9:01 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 8:46 8:46 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron44 Thompson43 Weal
 6:23 6:23 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 3:13 0:00 0:00 3:13 E
90 Tatar13 Domi11 Gallagher
 2:44 2:44 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 24 Danault - 43 Weal - 92 Drouin 2:29 0:00 2:29 0:00 E
41 Byron44 Thompson
 2:05 0:07 0:00 1:58 E
13 Domi - 14 Suzuki - 40 Armia - 90 Tatar 1:48 0:10 1:38 0:00 E
41 Byron44 Thompson40 Armia
 1:39 1:39 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi41 Byron
 1:24 1:24 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki90 Tatar
 1:14 1:14 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi14 Suzuki
 1:05 1:05 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher92 Drouin
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
92 Drouin44 Thompson43 Weal
 1:00 1:00 0:00 0:00 E
Others 10:32 9:21 0:48 0:23 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 17:43 17:17 0:00 0:26 +1
53 Mete  6 Weber
 14:38 13:39 0:00 0:59 +1
17 Kulak20 Fleury
 13:16 13:16 0:00 0:00 -1
26 Petry
 3:47 2:09 1:38 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 3:38 0:37 3:01 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 3:01 0:38 0:00 2:23 -1
53 Mete
 2:24 2:24 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete26 Petry
 1:52 0:44 0:00 1:08 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:34 0:40 0:16 0:38 E
Others 3:07 3:07 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
13MD
14NS		 92JD
15JK
40JA		 41PB
44NT
43JW		 24PD
62AL		 90TT
13MD
11BG		 11BG
24PD
43JW
92JD		 41PB
44NT		 8BC
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 17BK
20CF		 26JP 6SW 8BC
6SW		 53VM
23 McGinn - 20 Aho - 21 Niederreiter 0:05 0:47 3:58 0:41   0:09     5:12 0:52 1:03        
86 Teravainen - 11 Staal - 37 Svechnikov 4:10 1:10   0:10 0:01 0:04     0:54 3:49 1:07     0:01  
48 Martinook - 56 Haula - 18 Dzingel 0:32 3:45 0:45 0:01   0:48     2:19 1:46 1:23        
13 Foegele - 71 Wallmark - 88 Necas 0:33   0:16 2:51         0:56 1:24 2:16        
86 Teravainen - 20 Aho - 21 Niederreiter 1:18 1:09 1:15           0:33 1:21 2:11        
23 McGinn - 11 Staal - 37 Svechnikov 1:46 1:06       0:23     1:58 0:43 1:02        
86 Teravainen - 20 Aho             0:58         0:53 1:13   1:13
18 Dzingel - 56 Haula - 88 Necas 0:05 0:35 0:57 0:24         1:35 1:32          
11 Staal - 88 Necas - 20 Aho - 21 Niederreiter         2:00     0:37           1:30  
11 Staal - 37 Svechnikov                       1:19 0:37   0:12
56 Haula - 86 Teravainen - 18 Dzingel - 37 Svechnikov         0:46     0:47   0:59       0:50  
19 Hamilton - 74 Slavin 4:07 3:41 1:00 1:32 0:01 0:43 1:15   6:38 3:52 1:39 1:11 1:16 0:01  
6 Edmundson - 22 Pesce 4:46 3:15 0:58 2:12   1:04 1:04   2:05 5:29 5:03 0:22 1:35 0:23  
4 Fleury - 51 Gardiner 0:12 0:36 4:23 2:07         5:10 1:47 2:31        
22 Pesce - 51 Gardiner   1:09 1:40 0:24         1:13 1:30 1:35        
51 Gardiner         2:07     1:18 0:07         1:47 0:29
19 Hamilton         1:05     0:47 0:19 0:59   0:27   0:50 1:00
74 Slavin                       1:32 0:37   0:55
22 Pesce - 74 Slavin 0:03   0:13 0:04   0:57     0:13 0:26 1:18        

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 52.4% 52.4%    
Tatar-Domi 13.5% 13.5%    
Danault-Weal-Drouin 12.3%   12.3%  
Drouin 5.1% 5.1%    
Danault-Thompson 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 12.9% 10.7% 2.2%  
Totals   85.5% 14.5%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 51.4% 51.4%    
Tatar-Gallagher 15.6% 15.6%    
Suzuki-Armia-Tatar 10.3% 1.0% 9.3%  
Byron 8.0% 8.0%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 11.0% 8.3% 2.8%  
Totals   87.9% 12.1%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 66.1% 66.1%    
Domi-Armia-Tatar 13.2% 1.2% 12.0%  
Tatar 9.0% 9.0%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 7.9% 7.9%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   88.0% 12.0%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 68.0% 68.0%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 8.4% 8.4%    
Armia 5.7% 5.7%    
Thompson-Armia 5.0% 5.0%    
Drouin-Lehkonen 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 9.8% 9.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 52.9% 52.9%    
Lehkonen 16.1%     16.1%
Gallagher-Weal-Drouin 12.4%   12.4%  
Thompson-Gallagher 3.8% 3.8%    
Domi-Gallagher 3.2% 3.3%    
Others 11.6% 7.4% 2.3% 1.9%
Totals   67.3% 14.7% 18.0%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 52.5% 52.5%    
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 10.8% 1.0% 9.8%  
Byron-Thompson 9.9% 9.9%    
Drouin-Thompson 4.6% 4.6%    
Kotkaniemi 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 17.8% 14.4% 2.1% 1.3%
Totals   86.8% 11.9% 1.3%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weal 48.7% 48.7%    
Thompson 15.9% 0.9%   15.0%
Thompson-Armia 12.6% 12.6%    
Domi 10.7% 10.7%    
Domi-Weal 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 8.1% 6.9%   1.3%
Totals   83.7%   16.3%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Thompson 55.0% 55.0%    
Gallagher-Danault-Drouin 21.4%   21.4%  
Drouin-Thompson 8.6% 8.6%    
Byron-Domi 4.5% 4.5%    
Byron-Danault 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 7.0% 4.3% 2.7%  
Totals   75.9% 24.1%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weal 44.5% 44.5%    
Byron 14.5% 0.8%   13.7%
Byron-Armia 11.5% 11.5%    
Drouin-Weal 7.0% 7.0%    
Drouin-Armia 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 17.2% 17.2%    
Totals   86.3%   13.7%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 60.6% 60.6%    
Danault 21.6%     21.6%
Kotkaniemi-Suzuki 7.3% 7.3%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.4% 3.4%    
Drouin-Kotkaniemi 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 4.5% 4.5%    
Totals   78.4%   21.6%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 59.8% 59.8%    
Domi-Gallagher 15.5% 15.5%    
Domi-Suzuki-Armia 10.2% 0.9% 9.2%  
Suzuki 7.0% 7.0%    
Domi-Armia-Drouin 1.1%   1.1%  
Others 6.4% 5.6% 0.8%  
Totals   88.8% 11.2%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 52.7% 52.7%    
Gallagher-Danault-Weal 14.9%   14.9%  
Gallagher 6.2% 6.2%    
Thompson-Weal 6.0% 6.0%    
Thompson-Armia 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 15.6% 11.8% 3.8%  
Totals   81.3% 18.7%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 60.5% 56.4%   4.1%
  15.0% 2.5% 12.5%  
Chiarot 12.5% 2.6%   9.9%
Petry 6.5% 2.8% 1.1% 2.6%
Kulak 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   69.9% 13.6% 16.5%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 81.3% 79.3%   2.0%
Weber 13.8% 2.9%   10.9%
Fleury 2.4% 2.4%    
Kulak 1.1% 1.1%    
Mete 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   87.1%   12.9%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 91.5% 91.5%    
Weber 5.5% 5.5%    
Chiarot 1.6% 1.6%    
Petry 1.4% 1.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 89.2% 89.2%    
Petry 4.3% 4.3%    
Chiarot 3.6% 3.6%    
Weber 2.9% 2.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 68.8% 67.1%   1.7%
  14.7% 8.3% 6.3%  
Mete 7.2% 2.8%   4.4%
Weber 6.1% 2.6% 1.0% 2.5%
Fleury 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   84.1% 7.4% 8.5%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 76.3% 71.2%   5.1%
  12.5% 12.5%    
Petry 9.7% 3.8%   5.9%
Chiarot 1.0% 1.0%    
Chiarot-Weber 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   89.0%   11.0%
Back to main page