Game #21 - November 19, 2019 - Montreal 2 at Columbus 5
Game #21 - November 19, 2019
  Montreal   2   at     Columbus   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 12:00 12:00 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi43 Weal
 11:58 11:58 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi14 Suzuki40 Armia
 11:44 11:44 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson54 Hudon
 8:48 8:48 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 21 Cousins - 40 Armia - 43 Weal 2:21 0:00 2:21 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:46 0:00 0:00 1:46 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:17 0:03 1:14 0:00 E
Others 10:06 9:07 0:25 0:34 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kulak20 Fleury
 16:14 16:14 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 16:02 16:02 0:00 0:00 -2
53 Mete  6 Weber
 15:40 15:40 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 2:27 0:00 2:27 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot53 Mete
 1:48 1:06 0:00 0:42 E
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 1:41 1:04 0:11 0:26 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:35 0:23 0:00 1:12 E
26 Petry
 1:25 0:03 1:22 0:00 E
Others 3:08 3:08 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
15JK
43JW		 13MD
14NS
40JA		 21NC
44NT
54CH		 13MD
21NC
40JA
43JW		 17BK
20CF		 8BC
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 6SW
22 Milano - 18 Dubois - 52 Bemstrom 1:39 1:33 2:48 4:49   2:58 5:26 3:19  
50 Robinson - 10 Wennberg - 77 Anderson 1:22 0:50 6:34 1:29   2:34 3:47 3:55  
42 Texier - 20 Nash - 13 Atkinson 1:32 6:44 0:19 1:32   6:41 1:48 2:34  
14 Nyquist - 38 Jenner - 28 Bjorkstrand 5:42 1:53 0:45 0:08   1:13 2:11 4:49  
38 Jenner - 77 Anderson         1:21       1:21
3 Jones - 8 Werenski 5:02 3:44 4:20 2:51 1:13 5:17 2:26 7:41 1:13
27 Murray - 58 Savard 4:45 5:06 3:54 2:13   4:17 9:41 3:08  
44 Gavrikov - 46 Kukan 1:47 2:48 2:49 3:44   6:00 3:28 3:49  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 76.1% 76.1%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 8.1% 0.3% 7.8%  
Domi-Danault 5.4% 5.4%    
Hudon-Danault 2.4% 2.4%    
Tatar-Suzuki 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 5.5% 4.0% 1.5%  
Totals   90.7% 9.3%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 67.8% 67.8%    
Cousins-Armia-Weal 13.6%   13.6%  
Suzuki-Weal 5.3% 5.3%    
Danault-Gallagher 4.9% 4.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 5.8% 4.4% 1.3%  
Totals   85.1% 14.9%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Armia 73.0% 73.0%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 8.0% 0.3% 7.7%  
Domi-Weal 5.7% 5.7%    
Tatar-Armia 2.8% 2.8%    
Cousins-Domi 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 7.8% 7.8%    
Totals   92.3% 7.7%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weal 83.8% 83.8%    
Cousins-Weal 4.7% 4.7%    
Domi-Armia 3.3% 3.3%    
Lehkonen-Armia 2.5% 2.5%    
Tatar-Weal 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Hudon 62.0% 62.0%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 16.5%   16.5%  
Kotkaniemi-Weal 4.7% 4.7%    
Tatar-Thompson 3.6% 3.6%    
Danault-Hudon 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 9.5% 9.5%    
Totals   83.5% 16.5%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 66.9% 66.9%    
Lehkonen 9.9%     9.9%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 7.2% 0.3% 6.9%  
Domi-Gallagher 4.7% 4.7%    
Cousins-Hudon 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 8.5% 5.8% 2.3% 0.4%
Totals   80.6% 9.2% 10.2%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 73.3% 73.3%    
Domi-Cousins-Weal 14.7%   14.7%  
Thompson 3.1%     3.1%
Domi-Kotkaniemi 2.9% 2.9%    
Tatar-Suzuki 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   82.2% 14.7% 3.1%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 68.5% 68.5%    
Domi-Cousins-Armia 13.5%   13.5%  
Domi-Suzuki 5.2% 5.2%    
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 3.8% 3.8%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 6.9% 6.3% 0.6%  
Totals   86.0% 14.0%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Hudon 80.7% 80.7%    
Cousins-Lehkonen 4.7% 4.7%    
Tatar-Cousins 4.7% 4.7%    
Armia 4.6%     4.6%
Lehkonen-Weal 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 2.3%   1.7% 0.6%
Totals   93.1% 1.7% 5.2%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 87.1% 87.1%    
Cousins-Danault 5.1% 5.1%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.8% 3.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 2.3% 2.3%    
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Weal 73.9% 73.9%    
Danault 10.9%     10.9%
Cousins-Thompson 3.2% 3.2%    
Suzuki-Weal 2.3% 2.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 7.5% 6.4% 1.1%  
Totals   88.0% 1.1% 10.9%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 78.4% 78.4%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 8.4% 0.3% 8.1%  
Thompson-Cousins 3.4% 3.4%    
Suzuki-Armia 2.9% 2.9%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 4.4% 3.5% 0.9%  
Totals   91.1% 8.9%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 71.8% 71.8%    
  11.2%   11.2%  
Chiarot 7.7% 4.9% 0.8% 2.0%
Petry 7.3% 1.8%   5.5%
Fleury 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   80.4% 12.1% 7.5%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 80.2% 80.2%    
Mete 9.0% 5.5%   3.5%
Weber 8.4% 5.3% 0.9% 2.2%
Kulak 2.3% 2.3%    
Totals   93.4% 0.9% 5.7%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 91.3% 91.3%    
Mete 3.7% 3.7%    
Chiarot 2.6% 2.6%    
Petry 1.3% 1.3%    
Weber 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   100.0%    
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 94.5% 94.5%    
Petry 3.4% 3.4%    
Weber 1.5% 1.5%    
Mete 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 78.3% 78.3%    
Weber 7.7% 1.9%   5.9%
  6.9% 0.2% 6.7%  
Mete 3.1% 3.1%    
Fleury 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 1.1% 1.1%    
Totals   87.5% 6.7% 5.9%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 83.0% 83.0%    
Chiarot 9.5% 5.8%   3.7%
Kulak 3.5% 3.5%    
Petry 3.4% 3.4%    
Fleury 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   96.3%   3.7%
Back to main page