Game #23 - November 23, 2019 - N.Y. Rangers 6 at Montreal 5
Game #23 - November 23, 2019
  N.Y. Rangers   6   at     Montreal   5
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 9:02 5:48 3:14 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen14 Suzuki13 Domi
 7:48 5:39 2:09 0:00 +3
21 Cousins44 Thompson43 Weal
 7:45 4:50 2:55 0:00 E
13 Domi15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 4:19 0:00 4:19 0:00 E
54 Hudon15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
 4:03 3:04 0:59 0:00 -2
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 54 Hudon - 90 Tatar 2:57 0:03 2:54 0:00 -1
21 Cousins44 Thompson62 Lehkonen
 1:54 0:41 1:13 0:00 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
 1:42 0:00 0:00 1:42 E
43 Weal13 Domi40 Armia
 1:36 0:00 1:36 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 13 Domi - 40 Armia - 43 Weal 1:24 0:00 1:24 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:18 0:00 0:00 1:18 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 43 Weal - 54 Hudon 1:09 0:00 1:09 0:00 E
Others 15:03 8:48 3:49 2:26 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 18:03 11:25 3:58 2:40 +1
53 Mete26 Petry
 11:06 7:17 3:49 0:00 E
28 Reilly20 Fleury
 8:57 6:17 2:40 0:00 E
28 Reilly  6 Weber
 6:31 0:01 6:30 0:00 E
26 Petry
 4:06 0:03 4:03 0:00 -1
  8 Chiarot53 Mete
 2:30 1:12 1:18 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 2:23 0:19 2:04 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 1:27 1:27 0:00 0:00 -1
26 Petry20 Fleury
 1:13 0:00 0:00 1:13 E
  8 Chiarot28 Reilly
 1:08 0:13 0:55 0:00 E
Others 2:36 0:39 0:24 1:33 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
14NS
13MD		 21NC
44NT
43JW		 13MD
15JK
40JA		 54CH
15JK
40JA		 11BG
14NS
54CH
90TT		 8BC
6SW		 53VM
26JP		 28MR
20CF		 28MR
6SW		 26JP 8BC
53VM		 26JP
6SW
10 Panarin - 16 Strome - 17 Fast 3:54 0:18 0:10       5:23 0:06   0:41   0:10  
10 Panarin - 16 Strome - 20 Kreider 2:36 0:07 0:18   0:18   3:03 0:07 0:37       1:04
89 Buchnevich - 72 Chytil - 20 Kreider 0:18 3:16 0:34     0:02 0:46 3:11 0:32   0:02 0:38  
16 Strome - 17 Fast       1:25   0:44       2:35 1:31    
48 Lemieux - 72 Chytil - 89 Buchnevich   0:54 0:44   0:06   0:32 1:27 0:06        
48 Lemieux - 21 Howden - 24 Kakko   0:36 0:09   1:38   0:17 1:31 1:56        
48 Lemieux - 21 Howden       1:29   1:11 0:19   0:15 1:41 1:11    
10 Panarin - 16 Strome - 20 Kreider - 24 Kakko             2:09            
17 Fast - 21 Howden - 24 Kakko   0:20 1:27   0:08   0:36 0:19 1:22       0:09
14 McKegg - 38 Haley   0:01 1:21   0:07   0:09 0:11 1:27        
10 Panarin - 72 Chytil - 20 Kreider 0:43           1:23 0:04       0:30  
21 Howden - 17 Fast       1:05   0:20   0:29   1:06 0:20    
8 Trouba - 76 Skjei 3:45 3:12 1:13   1:21 1:17 5:45 2:54 3:00 0:44 1:17 0:40 1:10
23 Fox - 55 Lindgren 3:07 2:14 1:46   0:43 0:02 3:20 3:16 2:12   0:02 0:38 0:07
25 Hajek - 77 Deangelo 1:05 0:50 1:13   0:59   2:52 1:25 1:33        
8 Trouba - 23 Fox 0:13   0:45   0:12   0:57 0:18 0:13     0:14  
25 Hajek - 55 Lindgren       1:08 0:08 1:26 0:34   0:08 1:08 1:41    
77 Deangelo             2:09            
42 Smith - 76 Skjei       1:57   0:01       1:58 0:55    
42 Smith - 55 Lindgren       1:13           2:32      
23 Fox - 42 Smith - 55 Lindgren 0:12   1:04       0:09 0:22 1:19        

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 50.6% 32.5% 18.1%  
Suzuki-Hudon-Tatar 16.5% 0.3% 16.2%  
Domi-Armia-Weal 7.8%   7.8%  
Suzuki-Weal-Hudon 6.4%   6.4%  
Hudon-Danault 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 14.8% 12.8% 2.1%  
Totals   49.3% 50.7%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 39.8% 28.9% 11.0%  
Kotkaniemi-Armia 22.0%   22.0%  
Weal-Armia 8.2%   8.2%  
Gallagher-Armia-Weal 7.1%   7.1%  
Hudon-Armia 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 18.1% 10.8% 7.3%  
Totals   44.3% 55.7%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 53.0% 38.4% 14.6%  
Gallagher-Hudon-Tatar 20.0% 0.3% 19.7%  
Gallagher-Weal-Hudon 7.8%   7.8%  
Lehkonen 5.3%     5.3%
Domi-Lehkonen-Tatar 2.6%   2.6%  
Others 11.2% 8.9% 2.3%  
Totals   47.7% 47.0% 5.3%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Armia 39.2%   39.2%  
Hudon-Armia 36.8% 27.9% 8.9%  
Thompson-Hudon 5.9% 5.9%    
Thompson-Armia 3.6% 3.6%    
Hudon-Gallagher 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 10.9% 8.5% 2.4%  
Totals   49.4% 50.6%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weal 60.9% 38.0% 22.9%  
Thompson-Lehkonen 14.9% 5.4% 9.6%  
Domi-Weal 6.0% 6.0%    
Danault-Gallagher 4.2% 3.3% 0.9%  
Kotkaniemi-Weal 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 11.4% 4.5% 6.9%  
Totals   59.6% 40.4%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 61.7% 39.6% 22.1%  
Lehkonen 8.9%     8.9%
  5.2%     5.2%
Hudon-Gallagher 4.7% 4.7%    
Cousins-Gallagher 3.6% 2.8% 0.8%  
Others 15.9% 6.0% 9.9%  
Totals   53.1% 32.8% 14.1%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Kotkaniemi 25.3%   25.3%  
Hudon-Kotkaniemi 23.7% 18.0% 5.8%  
Thompson 10.0%     10.0%
Weal-Domi 9.4%   9.4%  
Gallagher-Domi-Weal 8.2%   8.2%  
Others 23.4% 13.7% 9.8%  
Totals   31.6% 58.4% 10.0%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 52.9% 33.0% 19.9%  
Domi-Armia 10.9%   10.9%  
Gallagher-Domi-Armia 9.6%   9.6%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Hudon 7.8%   7.8%  
Cousins-Domi 5.2% 5.2%    
Others 13.5% 9.4% 4.1%  
Totals   47.7% 52.3%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Weal 51.1% 31.9% 19.2%  
Cousins-Lehkonen 12.5% 4.5% 8.0%  
Armia 11.2%     11.2%
Lehkonen 5.8%     5.8%
Kotkaniemi-Hudon 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 15.1% 10.5% 4.5%  
Totals   51.2% 31.8% 17.0%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 31.6% 23.9% 7.7%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 23.0% 0.4% 22.6%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Weal 9.0%   9.0%  
Domi-Armia 7.2% 7.2%    
Danault-Gallagher 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 23.9% 20.2% 3.8%  
Totals   57.0% 43.0%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Domi 49.0% 35.5% 13.5%  
Cousins-Thompson 11.9% 4.3% 7.6%  
Danault 8.2%     8.2%
Thompson 5.5%     5.5%
Suzuki 4.9%     4.9%
Others 20.5% 11.0% 9.5%  
Totals   50.7% 30.6% 18.6%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 64.8% 41.6% 23.2%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Hudon 21.1% 0.4% 20.8%  
Domi-Armia-Lehkonen 4.2%   4.2%  
Danault-Armia 3.8%   3.8%  
Domi-Suzuki-Lehkonen 2.7%   2.7%  
Others 3.3%   3.3%  
Totals   41.9% 58.1%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 63.0% 39.8% 13.8% 9.3%
Reilly 22.7% 0.1% 22.7%  
Petry 8.3% 1.1% 7.2%  
Mete 2.7%     2.7%
Fleury 1.9%     1.9%
Others 1.3%   0.5% 0.8%
Totals   41.0% 44.3% 14.7%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 76.5% 48.4% 16.8% 11.3%
Mete 10.6% 5.1% 5.5%  
Petry 6.1% 6.1%    
Reilly 4.8% 0.9% 3.9%  
Fleury 1.1%   1.1%  
Others 0.8% 0.2% 0.6%  
Totals   60.8% 27.9% 11.3%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Reilly 77.0% 54.1% 23.0%  
Petry 10.5%     10.5%
Weber 4.7%     4.7%
Mete 3.7% 3.7%    
Chiarot 2.2%   2.2%  
Others 1.9%     1.9%
Totals   57.8% 25.1% 17.1%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 54.2% 35.6% 18.6%  
  20.0% 0.2% 19.8%  
Weber 11.6% 1.5% 10.1%  
Chiarot 7.1% 7.1%    
Fleury 5.9%     5.9%
Others 1.1%     1.1%
Totals   44.5% 48.5% 7.0%
28 Reilly
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 52.9% 37.1% 15.8%  
Weber 38.5% 0.1% 38.4%  
Chiarot 6.7% 1.3% 5.4%  
  1.0% 1.0%    
Chiarot-Weber 0.9%   0.9%  
Totals   39.5% 60.5%  
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 74.9% 49.2% 25.8%  
Chiarot 16.9% 8.1% 8.8%  
Weber 5.3%     5.3%
Fleury 2.9% 2.9%    
Totals   60.2% 34.5% 5.3%
Back to main page