Game #24 - November 26, 2019 - Boston 8 at Montreal 1
Game #24 - November 26, 2019
  Boston   8   at     Montreal   1

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
12:08 12:08 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
10:21 10:21 0:00 0:00 -2
21 Cousins15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
7:30 7:30 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon44 Thompson43 Weal
7:12 7:12 0:00 0:00 E
54 Hudon15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
3:30 3:30 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson43 Weal
2:40 2:40 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins13 Domi14 Suzuki
1:45 1:45 0:00 0:00 -1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
1:44 0:00 0:00 1:44 E
13 Domi15 Kotkaniemi40 Armia
1:40 0:00 1:40 0:00 E
Others 11:30 8:33 2:20 0:37 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
20:24 19:08 0:00 1:16 E
28 Reilly20 Fleury
14:03 14:03 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete26 Petry
13:17 13:17 0:00 0:00 -3
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
2:23 1:52 0:17 0:14 E
28 Reilly  6 Weber
1:57 0:09 1:48 0:00 E
26 Petry
1:32 0:04 1:28 0:00 E
53 Mete20 Fleury
1:19 1:19 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry20 Fleury
1:18 0:27 0:00 0:51 -1
28 Reilly26 Petry
1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
Others 2:34 2:07 0:27 0:00 -1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG
62AL
13MD
14NS
21NC
15JK
40JA
54CH
44NT
43JW
54CH
15JK
40JA
21NC
44NT
43JW
8BC
6SW
28MR
20CF
53VM
26JP
8BC
26JP
63 Marchand - 46 Krejci - 88 Pastrnak 9:21 1:20     0:01 0:01 8:37 0:05 1:03 0:43
74 Debrusk - 68 Studnicka - 13 Coyle   1:33 2:31 2:22 2:13 0:04 0:38 3:02 5:26 0:41
10 Bjork - 52 Kuraly - 43 Heinen 0:03 5:39 1:38 1:14 0:10 0:58 1:58 5:15 2:26  
20 Nordstrom - 14 Wagner - 26 Lindholm 0:36 1:22 2:15 2:10 0:40 0:56 3:16 3:12 2:10  
33 Chara - 73 McAvoy 5:55 1:52 3:04 0:09 1:09 0:53 9:17 2:49 2:03 0:09
25 Carlo - 47 Krug 4:20 5:16 1:51 1:29 0:36 0:01 4:11 3:47 5:21 0:09
48 Grzelcyk - 75 Clifton 1:27 2:25 1:35 3:44 1:19 1:39 2:47 5:51 3:42 0:36
25 Carlo - 33 Chara 0:18 0:03 0:10           0:13 0:18
25 Carlo - 48 Grzelcyk   0:45 0:45       1:15 0:21 0:45 0:16

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 78.0% 78.0%    
Suzuki-Weal-Tatar 5.9%   5.9%  
Suzuki-Hudon-Tatar 5.6%   5.6%  
Danault 3.4% 3.4%    
Weal 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 5.4% 5.4%    
Totals   88.5% 11.5%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 66.7% 66.7%    
Cousins-Suzuki 11.3% 11.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 10.7%   10.7%  
Tatar-Suzuki 3.8% 3.8%    
Cousins-Weal 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 4.9% 4.9%    
Totals   89.3% 10.7%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 65.4% 65.4%    
Cousins-Domi 11.1% 11.1%    
Gallagher-Weal-Tatar 5.8%   5.8%  
Gallagher-Hudon-Tatar 5.5%   5.5%  
Tatar-Domi 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 8.5% 6.7% 1.8%  
Totals   86.9% 13.1%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Armia 49.8% 49.8%    
Hudon-Armia 23.2% 23.2%    
Domi-Armia 11.1%   11.1%  
Thompson-Armia 4.3% 4.3%    
Armia 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 8.2% 8.2%    
Totals   88.9% 11.1%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Armia 51.9% 51.9%    
Thompson-Weal 18.5% 18.5%    
Domi-Suzuki 12.1% 12.1%    
Danault-Armia 3.9% 3.9%    
Thompson-Armia 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 10.0% 9.1% 0.9%  
Totals   99.1% 0.9%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 75.8% 75.8%    
Lehkonen 10.8%     10.8%
Cousins-Armia 3.5% 3.5%    
Gallagher 3.3% 3.3%    
Hudon-Weal 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 4.6% 4.6%    
Totals   89.2%   10.8%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 47.1% 47.1%    
Hudon-Kotkaniemi 22.0% 22.0%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi 10.5%   10.5%  
Kotkaniemi-Thompson 4.1% 4.1%    
Cousins-Danault 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 12.8% 8.6% 0.8% 3.4%
Totals   85.3% 11.3% 3.4%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Thompson 54.1% 54.1%    
Cousins-Thompson 20.0% 20.0%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 6.9%   6.9%  
Lehkonen 4.9% 4.9%    
Cousins-Domi 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 11.1% 10.1% 1.0%  
Totals   92.1% 7.9%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Weal 56.2% 56.3%    
Cousins-Weal 20.8% 20.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 5.1% 5.1%    
Lehkonen-Hudon 4.6% 4.6%    
Armia 4.2%     4.2%
Others 9.1% 6.5% 2.0% 0.7%
Totals   93.2% 2.0% 4.8%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weal 53.7% 53.7%    
Kotkaniemi-Armia 26.1% 26.1%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 6.5%   6.5%  
Lehkonen-Thompson 4.3% 4.3%    
Danault-Weal 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 7.1% 4.0% 3.1%  
Totals   90.4% 9.6%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 71.2% 71.2%    
Danault 11.9%     11.9%
Weal 4.5% 4.5%    
Thompson-Hudon 4.0% 4.0%    
Danault-Suzuki 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 6.5% 5.0% 0.9% 0.6%
Totals   86.6% 0.9% 12.5%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 79.6% 79.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Weal 6.0%   6.0%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Hudon 5.7%   5.7%  
Domi-Suzuki 3.8% 3.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 3.6% 1.6% 2.0%  
Totals   86.3% 13.7%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 87.6% 82.1%   5.4%
Reilly 8.4% 0.6% 7.7%  
Mete 2.3% 2.3%    
Petry 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   86.8% 7.7% 5.4%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 86.7% 81.4%   5.4%
Petry 10.1% 7.9% 1.2% 1.0%
Mete 2.4% 2.4%    
Reilly 0.7% 0.7%    
Totals   92.4% 1.2% 6.4%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Reilly 84.3% 84.3%    
Mete 7.9% 7.9%    
Petry 7.8% 2.7%   5.1%
Totals   94.9%   5.1%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 66.0% 66.0%    
Chiarot 11.8% 9.3% 1.4% 1.2%
  7.6% 0.3% 7.3%  
Fleury 6.5% 2.2%   4.2%
Reilly 6.0% 6.0%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   85.9% 8.7% 5.4%
28 Reilly
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 76.9% 76.9%    
Weber 10.7% 0.8% 9.9%  
Petry 6.7% 6.7%    
  2.5%   2.5%  
Mete 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   87.7% 12.3%  
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 82.3% 82.3%    
Fleury 8.2% 8.2%    
Chiarot 3.5% 3.5%    
Weber 3.3% 3.3%    
Reilly 2.7% 2.7%    
Totals   100.0%    

Back to main page