Game #29 - December 5, 2019 - Colorado 3 at Montreal 2
Game #29 - December 5, 2019
  Colorado   3   at     Montreal   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 11:20 11:20 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen13 Domi40 Armia
 6:11 5:57 0:14 0:00 E
21 Cousins14 Suzuki43 Weal
 6:04 6:04 0:00 0:00 E
63 Peca44 Thompson43 Weal
 4:29 4:29 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Cousins13 Domi14 Suzuki
 2:52 2:52 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 21 Cousins - 40 Armia - 43 Weal 2:17 0:00 2:17 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:09 0:00 0:00 2:09 E
62 Lehkonen24 Danault40 Armia
 1:46 1:46 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:44 0:07 1:37 0:00 -1
40 Armia44 Thompson
 1:26 0:00 0:00 1:26 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi11 Gallagher
 1:25 1:25 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 13 Domi - 24 Danault - 40 Armia - 90 Tatar 1:22 1:22 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen14 Suzuki40 Armia
 1:14 1:14 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault63 Peca
 1:12 0:55 0:00 0:17 E
Others 14:29 12:13 0:08 2:08 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 15:01 11:37 0:14 3:10 -1
17 Kulak26 Petry
 11:09 11:09 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot20 Fleury
 7:10 7:02 0:00 0:08 E
  6 Weber
 3:52 1:22 2:30 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 3:07 1:16 0:00 1:51 -1
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 3:06 3:06 0:00 0:00 E
64 Leskinen  6 Weber
 2:36 2:36 0:00 0:00 +1
17 Kulak20 Fleury
 2:29 2:20 0:00 0:09 E
26 Petry20 Fleury
 1:50 1:08 0:00 0:42 E
64 Leskinen26 Petry
 1:46 1:46 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
 1:39 0:07 1:32 0:00 -1
64 Leskinen20 Fleury
 1:39 1:39 0:00 0:00 E
64 Leskinen  8 Chiarot
 1:25 1:25 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot17 Kulak
 1:17 1:17 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:54 1:54 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
13MD
40JA		 21NC
14NS
43JW		 63MP
44NT
43JW		 21NC
13MD
14NS		 13MD
21NC
40JA
43JW		 24PD
62AL		 8BC
6SW		 17BK
26JP		 8BC
20CF		 6SW 26JP
6SW		 8BC
26JP		 64OL
6SW		 17BK
20CF
72 Donskoi - 29 MacKinnon - 96 Rantanen 7:08 0:42     0:01     8:16 1:04 0:40   0:54 0:27    
11 Calvert - 41 Bellemare - 13 Nichushkin 1:54 0:43 2:41 2:19 0:03     0:14 1:05 2:50       2:06  
37 Compher - 92 Landeskog - 95 Burakovsky 1:05 3:00 0:02 0:42 1:03     0:42 5:25 0:03     0:31 0:02 0:46
83 Nieto - 17 Jost - 36 Tynan   0:55 0:30 1:17 0:39       0:44 1:20     0:21 0:21 0:03
92 Landeskog - 29 MacKinnon - 72 Donskoi - 96 Rantanen             1:27 3:04       0:49      
92 Landeskog - 29 MacKinnon - 96 Rantanen 0:27 0:03           0:45 0:09   0:38 0:07 0:02    
16 Zadorov - 49 Girard 2:22 3:11 2:15 1:01 0:40     3:12 4:16 2:26   0:54 0:23 0:23 1:11
8 Makar - 27 Graves 5:54 0:41 0:02 0:41 0:34     6:00 3:02 1:06   0:01 0:20 0:34  
28 Cole - 44 Barberio 1:35 1:41 2:20 2:14 1:05     0:02 3:10 2:31   0:21 0:59 1:06 0:42
8 Makar             1:27 3:04       1:51      
27 Graves - 28 Cole 0:06 0:10       2:14       0:21 2:27        
8 Makar - 49 Girard 1:18 0:06 0:37       0:13 1:37   0:37     0:31   0:09
16 Zadorov - 27 Graves 0:05 0:04 0:08 0:22 0:24     0:25 0:22   0:08   0:18   0:24
16 Zadorov - 28 Cole     0:33 0:10             1:14   0:01 0:33  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 57.3% 57.3%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 8.8% 0.6% 8.2%  
Lehkonen-Domi 7.2% 7.2%    
Domi-Danault-Armia-Tatar 6.9% 6.9%    
Tatar-Domi 4.6% 4.6%    
Others 15.2% 14.4% 0.7% 0.2%
Totals   91.0% 8.8% 0.2%
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Armia 34.3% 33.0% 1.3%  
Cousins-Suzuki 15.9% 15.9%    
Cousins-Armia-Weal 12.7%   12.7%  
Lehkonen-Gallagher 7.8% 7.8%    
Gallagher-Danault-Armia-Tatar 7.6% 7.6%    
Others 21.8% 21.8%    
Totals   86.1% 13.9%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Weal 39.7% 39.7%    
Cousins-Domi 18.7% 18.7%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 11.3% 0.8% 10.6%  
Lehkonen-Armia 8.1% 8.1%    
Cousins-Armia 3.9% 3.9%    
Others 18.3% 18.3%    
Totals   89.4% 10.6%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Armia 74.5% 74.5%    
Tatar-Armia 17.0% 17.0%    
Tatar-Gallagher 8.5% 8.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Weal 44.0% 44.0%    
Domi-Suzuki 20.8% 20.8%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 16.6%   16.6%  
Suzuki-Armia 4.4% 4.4%    
Danault-Domi 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 10.8% 10.8%    
Totals   83.4% 16.6%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 46.0% 46.0%    
Lehkonen 8.7%     8.7%
Lehkonen-Armia 7.2% 7.2%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 7.0% 0.5% 6.6%  
Gallagher-Domi-Armia-Tatar 5.5% 5.5%    
Others 25.5% 20.6% 0.5% 4.3%
Totals   79.8% 7.1% 13.1%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 31.6% 30.4% 1.2%  
Domi-Cousins-Weal 11.7%   11.7%  
Lehkonen-Danault 9.0% 9.0%    
Thompson 7.3%     7.3%
Gallagher-Domi-Danault-Tatar 7.0% 7.0%    
Others 33.3% 26.7%   6.6%
Totals   73.1% 12.9% 14.0%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Suzuki 42.1% 42.1%    
Peca-Thompson 31.1% 31.1%    
Domi-Cousins-Armia 15.9%   15.9%  
Peca-Suzuki 3.2% 3.2%    
Cousins-Domi 3.0% 3.0%    
Others 4.6% 3.7% 0.9%  
Totals   83.2% 16.8%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Peca-Weal 44.1% 44.1%    
Armia 14.1%     14.1%
Lehkonen 7.9%     7.9%
Peca-Armia 7.5% 7.5%    
Lehkonen-Armia 6.1% 6.1%    
Others 20.3% 20.3%    
Totals   78.0%   22.0%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Armia 35.9% 34.5% 1.4%  
Danault 12.5%     12.5%
Danault-Armia 10.3% 10.3%    
Domi-Gallagher 8.2% 8.2%    
Suzuki-Armia 7.2% 7.2%    
Others 26.0% 21.4%   4.6%
Totals   81.5% 1.4% 17.1%
63 Peca
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weal 48.9% 48.9%    
Danault 13.1% 10.0%   3.1%
Thompson-Armia 8.4% 8.4%    
Armia 6.0%     6.0%
Thompson-Lehkonen 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 18.5% 18.5%    
Totals   90.9%   9.1%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 63.6% 63.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 9.7% 0.7% 9.1%  
Gallagher-Domi-Danault-Armia 7.7% 7.7%    
Domi-Gallagher 5.1% 5.1%    
Gallagher-Domi-Danault 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 9.9% 9.2% 0.7%  
Totals   90.2% 9.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 59.1% 45.7% 0.9% 12.5%
  15.2% 5.4% 9.8%  
Petry 12.3% 5.0%   7.3%
Leskinen 10.2% 10.2%    
Fleury 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   69.5% 10.8% 19.8%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 52.0% 40.2% 0.8% 11.0%
Fleury 24.8% 24.3%   0.5%
Petry 10.7% 10.7%    
Leskinen 4.9% 4.9%    
Kulak 4.4% 4.4%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   87.8% 0.8% 11.4%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 70.1% 70.1%    
Fleury 15.6% 14.7%   0.9%
Chiarot 8.1% 8.1%    
Chiarot-Fleury 5.0% 5.0%    
Leskinen 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   99.1%   0.9%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 48.3% 47.4%   0.9%
Kulak 16.7% 15.7%   1.0%
Petry 12.3% 7.6%   4.7%
Leskinen 11.1% 11.1%    
Chiarot-Kulak 5.4% 5.4%    
Others 6.2% 6.2%    
Totals   93.4%   6.6%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 49.0% 49.0%    
Weber 13.7% 5.6%   8.1%
Chiarot 13.6% 13.6%    
Fleury 8.1% 5.0%   3.1%
Leskinen 7.8% 7.8%    
Others 7.8% 1.0% 6.7%  
Totals   82.0% 6.7% 11.2%
64 Leskinen
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 34.1% 34.1%    
Petry 23.2% 23.2%    
Fleury 21.7% 21.7%    
Chiarot 18.6% 18.6%    
Kulak 2.4% 2.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page