Game #38 - December 28, 2019 - Montreal 4 at Tampa Bay 5
Game #38 - December 28, 2019
  Montreal   4   at     Tampa Bay   5

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
13:54 13:54 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
11:18 11:18 0:00 0:00 -3
21 Cousins15 Kotkaniemi43 Weal
10:36 10:36 0:00 0:00 +1
25 Poehling44 Thompson45 Barber
6:50 6:50 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 2:11 0:10 2:01 0:00 E
90 Tatar13 Domi11 Gallagher
1:29 1:29 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson43 Weal
1:22 1:22 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 13 Domi - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:19 1:03 0:16 0:00 E
25 Poehling24 Danault45 Barber
1:00 1:00 0:00 0:00 E
Others 10:01 6:26 1:27 2:08 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
17:16 15:46 0:00 1:30 -1
17 Kulak26 Petry
12:49 12:41 0:00 0:08 -2
53 Mete20 Fleury
6:56 6:56 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
3:17 2:51 0:26 0:00 E
53 Mete26 Petry
3:15 3:15 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot20 Fleury
3:08 3:08 0:00 0:00 +1
26 Petry
2:39 0:10 2:29 0:00 E
17 Kulak20 Fleury
2:15 2:15 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete  6 Weber
2:09 2:09 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot17 Kulak
1:36 1:36 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
1:32 1:32 0:00 0:00 E
17 Kulak  6 Weber
1:11 1:11 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:57 0:38 0:49 0:30 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG
62AL
13MD
14NS
21NC
15JK
43JW
25RP
44NT
45RB
11BG
14NS
24PD
90TT
8BC
6SW
17BK
26JP
53VM
20CF
26JP
6SW
53VM
26JP
8BC
20CF
26JP 17BK
20CF
53VM
6SW
17 Killorn - 91 Stamkos - 71 Cirelli 8:28 3:00 0:38 0:05   6:15 4:16   1:53 1:03 0:11   0:18 0:20
18 Palat - 21 Point - 86 Kucherov 3:44 4:29 1:10 2:18   5:32 4:40 0:42 0:21 0:29 0:59   0:06 0:23
37 Gourde - 9 Johnson - 7 Joseph 0:32 1:08 3:34 2:36   1:36 0:38 3:07 0:26   0:41   1:16  
14 Maroon - 13 Paquette - 67 Stephens 0:28 1:54 3:58 0:39   0:17 1:31 2:39   1:33 0:59   0:20 0:12
17 Killorn - 71 Cirelli         1:20       0:10     1:48    
27 McDonagh - 81 Cernak 4:11 2:51 3:06 1:50 1:34 4:15 2:42 0:43 0:48 0:53 1:47 1:34 0:09 1:03
22 Shattenkirk - 98 Sergachev 1:35 2:05 5:09 0:49   3:01 2:50 4:06 0:15 0:13 0:34   0:39 0:23
44 Rutta - 77 Hedman 4:11 3:20 0:35 2:18   4:38 2:41 1:32 0:07 0:38     0:28 0:43
22 Shattenkirk - 77 Hedman 0:15 1:06 0:25     0:56 1:43           0:35  
81 Cernak - 98 Sergachev 0:22 0:07 1:01 1:35   1:30 0:14 0:07   0:39 0:45      
27 McDonagh - 77 Hedman 0:11       0:37       1:07     1:05    
77 Hedman - 98 Sergachev 0:14 1:13         1:39 0:10 0:21          
27 McDonagh - 44 Rutta 0:48 0:07 0:09 0:05   0:56 0:44 0:07     0:02   0:09  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 63.3% 63.3%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 9.9% 0.8% 9.2%  
Tatar-Domi 6.8% 6.8%    
Domi-Danault-Tatar 6.0% 4.8% 1.2%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 11.3% 8.4% 2.9%  
Totals   86.7% 13.3%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 65.6% 65.6%    
Tatar-Gallagher 8.6% 8.6%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 7.6% 6.1% 1.5%  
Kotkaniemi-Cousins-Weal 4.7%   4.7%  
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 2.7%   2.7%  
Others 10.6% 9.7% 1.0%  
Totals   90.0% 10.0%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 68.2% 68.2%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 13.2% 1.0% 12.2%  
Danault 4.1%     4.1%
Poehling 2.8%     2.8%
Gallagher-Domi-Danault-Tatar 2.8%   2.8%  
Others 8.9% 8.1%   0.7%
Totals   77.4% 15.0% 7.6%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Weal 77.4% 77.4%    
Domi-Cousins-Weal 6.0%   6.0%  
Tatar-Gallagher 4.4% 4.4%    
Poehling-Barber 3.4% 3.4%    
Lehkonen-Weal 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 6.3% 6.3%    
Totals   94.0% 6.0%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Weal 77.3% 77.3%    
Thompson-Weal 10.0% 10.0%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Weal 6.0%   6.0%  
Domi-Gallagher 1.9% 1.9%    
Danault-Gallagher 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   94.0% 6.0%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 62.7% 62.7%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 9.8% 0.8% 9.1%  
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar 5.9% 4.7% 1.2%  
Poehling-Barber 4.5% 4.5%    
Lehkonen 3.3%     3.3%
Others 13.7% 8.6% 2.1% 3.1%
Totals   81.2% 12.4% 6.4%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Barber 64.7% 64.7%    
Danault-Barber 9.5% 9.5%    
Danault-Gallagher 4.6% 4.6%    
Kotkaniemi-Barber 4.4% 4.4%    
Suzuki 4.4%     4.4%
Others 12.5% 11.2%   1.3%
Totals   94.3%   5.7%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 75.8% 75.8%    
Cousins-Thompson 9.8% 9.8%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Cousins 5.8%   5.8%  
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 2.5% 2.5%    
Lehkonen-Domi 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 4.3% 3.1% 1.2%  
Totals   93.0% 7.0%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Barber 77.1% 77.1%    
Cousins-Weal 15.4% 15.4%    
Poehling-Suzuki 3.2% 3.2%    
Poehling-Gallagher 1.3% 1.3%    
Cousins-Barber 1.3% 1.3%    
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
45 Barber
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Thompson 74.0% 74.0%    
Poehling-Danault 10.8% 10.8%    
Lehkonen-Danault 7.4% 7.4%    
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 5.1% 5.1%    
Poehling 1.4%     1.4%
Others 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   98.6%   1.4%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 78.5% 78.5%    
Danault 5.1%     5.1%
Danault-Barber 4.7% 4.7%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 2.4% 2.4%    
Kotkaniemi-Poehling 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 6.9% 6.1%   0.8%
Totals   94.1%   5.9%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 66.6% 66.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 10.5% 0.8% 9.7%  
Domi-Gallagher 7.1% 7.1%    
Gallagher-Domi-Danault 6.3% 5.0% 1.3%  
Kotkaniemi-Gallagher 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 6.7% 3.7% 3.0%  
Totals   86.0% 14.0%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 69.7% 63.6%   6.1%
Petry 13.2% 11.5% 1.7%  
Mete 8.7% 8.7%    
Kulak 4.8% 4.8%    
  3.3%   3.3%  
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   88.9% 5.0% 6.1%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 73.4% 67.0%   6.4%
Fleury 13.3% 13.3%    
Kulak 6.8% 6.8%    
Petry 6.5% 6.5%    
Totals   93.6%   6.4%
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 71.2% 70.5%   0.7%
Fleury 12.5% 12.5%    
Chiarot 8.9% 8.9%    
Weber 6.6% 6.6%    
Mete 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   99.3%   0.7%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 52.1% 52.1%    
Chiarot 23.6% 23.6%    
Kulak 16.9% 16.9%    
Petry 6.8% 3.0%   3.8%
Weber 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   96.2%   3.8%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 52.5% 51.9%   0.5%
Weber 13.4% 11.7% 1.8%  
Mete 13.3% 13.3%    
  10.8% 0.7% 10.2%  
Chiarot 6.3% 6.3%    
Others 3.7% 1.6%   2.0%
Totals   85.5% 11.9% 2.6%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 55.5% 55.5%    
Petry 26.0% 26.0%    
Weber 17.2% 17.2%    
Kulak 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   100.0%    

Back to main page