Game #41 - January 2, 2020 - Tampa Bay 2 at Montreal 1
Game #41 - January 2, 2020
  Tampa Bay   2   at     Montreal   1
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault21 Cousins
 12:49 12:49 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
 10:53 10:53 0:00 0:00 E
25 Poehling15 Kotkaniemi43 Weal
 7:36 7:36 0:00 0:00 -1
42 Vejdemo44 Thompson22 Weise
 7:11 6:58 0:13 0:00 E
13 Domi - 15 Kotkaniemi - 21 Cousins - 43 Weal 1:57 0:06 1:51 0:00 +1
13 Domi - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:51 1:51 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen44 Thompson22 Weise
 1:44 1:30 0:14 0:00 E
13 Domi14 Suzuki
 1:33 1:00 0:33 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 25 Poehling - 90 Tatar 1:25 0:00 1:25 0:00 E
24 Danault90 Tatar
 1:09 1:09 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen15 Kotkaniemi14 Suzuki
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
Others 10:48 8:51 1:57 0:00 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 18:52 18:50 0:02 0:00 -1
17 Kulak20 Fleury
 14:36 14:23 0:13 0:00 E
53 Mete26 Petry
 13:54 13:54 0:00 0:00 -1
26 Petry  6 Weber
 2:50 1:50 1:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 2:01 0:00 2:01 0:00 E
26 Petry
 1:49 0:06 1:43 0:00 +1
  8 Chiarot53 Mete
 1:33 1:19 0:14 0:00 E
Others 4:25 3:25 1:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
21NC		 62AL
13MD
14NS		 25RP
15JK
43JW		 42LV
44NT
22DW		 8BC
6SW		 17BK
20CF		 53VM
26JP		 26JP
6SW		 6SW
18 Palat - 21 Point - 86 Kucherov 3:35 3:38 0:18 3:10 0:47 1:09 9:29 0:06  
17 Killorn - 91 Stamkos - 71 Cirelli 5:28 1:54 0:53 1:03 9:00 1:04 0:19 0:23  
14 Maroon - 13 Paquette - 9 Johnson 0:19 1:36 3:09 1:44 2:00 6:38      
23 Verhaeghe - 67 Stephens - 37 Gourde 0:20 2:28 1:33 0:21 1:41 2:19 1:06 0:21  
17 Killorn - 71 Cirelli         0:01   0:48   0:39
27 McDonagh - 81 Cernak 5:27 2:58 1:51 2:30 8:26 4:06 2:24 1:04 0:39
22 Shattenkirk - 98 Sergachev 1:01 1:49 1:57 1:53 2:02 3:40 3:48 0:21  
77 Hedman - 98 Sergachev 0:47 2:55   0:57 1:28 1:20 2:36 0:07 0:25
55 Coburn - 77 Hedman 2:40 0:38 1:29 0:13 2:05 2:14 2:25    
22 Shattenkirk - 77 Hedman 1:03 0:41 0:13 0:32 1:03 1:28 1:18    
22 Shattenkirk - 55 Coburn 1:01 1:06 0:58   1:29 0:20 1:01    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 56.6% 56.6%    
Kotkaniemi-Cousins-Weal 10.1% 0.5% 9.6%  
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 9.6% 9.6%    
Suzuki 8.1% 5.2% 2.9%  
Lehkonen-Weal 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 11.2% 5.9% 5.3%  
Totals   82.2% 17.8%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 52.5% 52.5%    
Domi-Danault-Tatar 8.9% 8.9%    
Domi 7.5% 4.8% 2.7%  
Danault-Poehling-Tatar 6.8%   6.8%  
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 5.1% 5.1%    
Others 19.1% 13.8% 5.2%  
Totals   85.3% 14.7%  
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Weal 54.4% 54.4%    
Domi-Cousins-Weal 14.0% 0.7% 13.2%  
Lehkonen-Suzuki 7.6% 7.6%    
Lehkonen-Weal 4.9% 4.9%    
Danault-Weal-Tatar 4.7%   4.7%  
Others 14.4% 14.2% 0.2%  
Totals   81.9% 18.1%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 73.1% 73.1%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Weal 11.1% 0.6% 10.6%  
Poehling-Danault 3.4% 3.4%    
Vejdemo-Thompson 3.1% 3.1%    
Tatar-Thompson 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 7.2% 4.6% 2.7%  
Totals   86.8% 13.2%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Vejdemo-Thompson 79.1% 76.7% 2.4%  
Lehkonen-Thompson 19.1% 16.5% 2.6%  
Vejdemo-Danault 1.3% 1.3%    
Tatar-Thompson 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   95.0% 5.0%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Cousins 64.2% 64.2%    
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 9.3% 9.3%    
Suzuki-Poehling-Tatar 7.1%   7.1%  
Tatar 5.8% 5.8%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal-Tatar 3.3%   3.3%  
Others 10.4% 10.4%    
Totals   89.6% 10.4%  
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Weal 74.9% 74.9%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 14.0%   14.0%  
Danault-Cousins 5.9% 5.9%    
Suzuki-Cousins-Tatar 2.8%   2.8%  
Thompson-Weal 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   83.3% 16.7%  
42 Vejdemo
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 77.2% 74.9% 2.3%  
Thompson-Cousins 5.9% 5.9%    
Thompson-Suzuki 5.7% 5.7%    
Kotkaniemi-Weal 3.6% 3.6%    
Kotkaniemi-Suzuki 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 4.8% 4.8%    
Totals   97.7% 2.3%  
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 54.1% 54.1%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Cousins 13.9% 0.7% 13.2%  
Lehkonen-Domi 5.9% 5.9%    
Lehkonen-Kotkaniemi 4.9% 4.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Tatar 4.6%   4.6%  
Others 16.6% 13.2% 3.4%  
Totals   78.8% 21.2%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Vejdemo-Weise 62.5% 60.6% 1.9%  
Lehkonen-Weise 15.1% 13.0% 2.0%  
Vejdemo-Cousins 4.8% 4.8%    
Vejdemo-Suzuki 4.6% 4.6%    
Domi-Suzuki 3.6% 1.2% 2.5%  
Others 9.4% 9.4%    
Totals   93.6% 6.4%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 65.0% 65.0%    
Thompson-Weise 10.4% 9.0% 1.4%  
Kotkaniemi-Suzuki 6.4% 6.4%    
Domi-Weal 5.0% 5.0%    
Suzuki 4.8% 4.8%    
Others 8.5% 8.5%    
Totals   98.6% 1.4%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Cousins 63.0% 63.0%    
Domi-Suzuki-Danault 9.1% 9.1%    
Suzuki-Danault-Poehling 7.0%   7.0%  
Danault 5.7% 5.7%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Weal 3.2%   3.2%  
Others 12.1% 7.3% 4.8%  
Totals   85.0% 15.0%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 77.3% 77.1% 0.1%  
Petry 11.6% 7.5% 4.1%  
  8.3%   8.3%  
Kulak 2.2% 2.2%    
Chiarot-Petry 0.3%   0.3%  
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   87.2% 12.8%  
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 83.7% 83.6% 0.1%  
Mete 6.9% 5.8% 1.0%  
  4.1%   4.1%  
Petry 3.8% 3.8%    
Kulak 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 0.4%   0.4%  
Totals   94.4% 5.6%  
17 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 91.2% 89.9% 1.4%  
Petry 3.9% 3.9%    
Weber 3.3% 3.3%    
Chiarot 1.6% 1.6%    
Totals   98.6% 1.4%  
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 93.1% 91.7% 1.4%  
Petry 4.3% 4.3%    
Mete 2.6% 2.6%    
Weber 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   98.6% 1.4%  
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 66.9% 66.9%    
Weber 13.6% 8.8% 4.8%  
  8.7% 0.5% 8.3%  
Chiarot 4.2% 4.2%    
Fleury 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 3.4% 3.0% 0.4%  
Totals   86.5% 13.5%  
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 87.3% 87.3%    
Chiarot 9.7% 8.3% 1.5%  
Fleury 2.5% 2.5%    
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   98.5% 1.5%  
Back to main page