Game #46 - January 11, 2020 - Montreal 2 at Ottawa 1 (OT)
Game #46 - January 11, 2020
  Montreal   2   at     Ottawa   1     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault17 Kovalchuk
 11:18 11:18 0:00 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen13 Domi14 Suzuki
 8:04 8:04 0:00 0:00 E
63 Peca15 Kotkaniemi21 Cousins
 7:09 7:09 0:00 0:00 -1
25 Poehling44 Thompson22 Weise
 5:57 5:57 0:00 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:51 0:04 0:00 2:47 E
24 Danault90 Tatar
 2:14 2:14 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 62 Lehkonen - 90 Tatar 2:01 0:00 2:01 0:00 E
25 Poehling44 Thompson
 2:01 0:00 0:00 2:01 E
13 Domi - 15 Kotkaniemi - 17 Kovalchuk - 21 Cousins 1:56 0:00 1:56 0:00 E
14 Suzuki62 Lehkonen
 1:41 1:41 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi17 Kovalchuk
 1:28 1:28 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault14 Suzuki
 1:10 0:57 0:13 0:00 E
Others 16:18 13:48 0:55 1:35 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
28 Scandella26 Petry
 14:22 14:09 0:13 0:00 -1
53 Mete  6 Weber
 13:33 13:33 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak20 Fleury
 10:43 10:43 0:00 0:00 E
28 Scandella  6 Weber
 4:33 2:09 0:00 2:24 E
26 Petry
 4:29 2:22 2:07 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 3:38 1:46 0:26 1:26 E
  6 Weber
 2:44 0:48 1:56 0:00 E
26 Petry20 Fleury
 2:19 0:20 0:00 1:59 E
53 Mete26 Petry
 1:52 1:52 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak26 Petry
 1:09 1:09 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak  6 Weber
 1:02 0:39 0:23 0:00 E
Others 3:44 3:10 0:00 0:34 +1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
17IK		 62AL
13MD
14NS		 63MP
15JK
21NC		 25RP
44NT
22DW		 24PD
62AL		 24PD
90TT		 25RP
44NT		 14NS
24PD
62AL
90TT		 28MS
26JP		 53VM
6SW		 77BK
20CF		 28MS
6SW		 26JP 26JP
6SW		 6SW 26JP
20CF
38 Balcers - 51 Anisimov - 90 Namestnikov 0:28 0:50 1:40 1:56         1:02 0:31 3:33          
7 Tkachuk - 44 Pageau - 28 Brown 3:27 0:16 0:16 0:13         1:04 3:22 0:23     0:09    
10 Duclair - 44 Pageau - 28 Brown 2:37 1:19 0:01           1:58 2:22 0:07 0:29        
7 Tkachuk - 10 Duclair - 19 Batherson - 44 Pageau         2:03   1:06         2:17   1:20    
19 Batherson - 7 Tkachuk - 36 White 0:43 2:03 0:15 0:26         1:08 1:08 0:07 0:07       0:12
63 Ennis - 71 Tierney - 78 Chlapik 0:33   0:20 1:14         0:15 0:53 1:30 0:03        
10 Duclair - 71 Tierney - 19 Batherson 0:34 0:55 0:22 0:30         2:31   0:06          
63 Ennis - 36 White - 78 Chlapik   0:39 1:15 0:27         1:12 0:44 0:37          
7 Tkachuk - 44 Pageau           1:20       0:29     1:27   0:34  
44 Pageau - 90 Namestnikov           0:28   0:54   0:32     0:54   0:31  
78 Chlapik - 71 Tierney - 28 Brown         0:01             1:30   0:02    
71 Tierney - 28 Brown               1:02 0:13       1:02 0:04 0:49  
38 Balcers - 36 White - 51 Anisimov - 63 Ennis         0:42   0:42         0:05       1:41
72 Chabot - 81 Hainsey 7:41 1:36 1:08 1:37   0:38     5:55 6:12 3:37 1:11   0:02   0:08
2 Demelo - 5 Reilly 3:16 4:44 1:30 1:16 0:05       5:45 4:57 1:07 0:55       0:15
72 Chabot         2:03 1:36 1:07         2:22 2:16 1:20 0:48 0:43
29 Goloubef - 39 Englund 0:05   3:35 1:22         0:47 0:52 4:31          
2 Demelo - 81 Hainsey 0:07     0:03 0:01     1:18 0:57   0:18 0:05 1:18   1:21  
5 Reilly - 72 Chabot 0:09 0:36 0:04 0:14         0:17 0:53       1:20   0:15
5 Reilly         0:42   0:54           0:06 0:06   0:58
2 Demelo - 72 Chabot   1:07 0:26           0:14 0:36 0:16     0:07    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 44.0% 44.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk-Cousins 10.6%   10.6%  
Kovalchuk 8.0% 8.0%    
Cousins-Suzuki 5.0% 5.0%    
Thompson-Kovalchuk 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 27.5% 23.1% 4.2% 0.2%
Totals   85.1% 14.7% 0.2%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 45.5% 45.5%    
Danault-Lehkonen-Tatar 11.4%   11.4%  
Lehkonen 9.5% 9.5%    
Tatar-Danault 6.6% 5.4% 1.2%  
Cousins-Domi 5.2% 5.2%    
Others 21.9% 21.1% 0.6% 0.2%
Totals   86.7% 13.2% 0.2%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Peca-Cousins 55.6% 55.6%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Cousins 15.0%   15.0%  
Poehling-Cousins 6.2% 6.2%    
Tatar 5.8% 5.8%    
Poehling-Weise 5.6% 5.6%    
Others 11.8% 8.4% 3.4%  
Totals   81.6% 18.4%  
17 Kovalchuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 55.3% 55.3%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Cousins 9.5%   9.5%  
Domi 7.2% 7.2%    
Domi-Thompson 4.4% 4.4%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi 3.5% 1.4% 2.1%  
Others 20.1% 17.8% 2.4%  
Totals   86.1% 13.9%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Peca-Kotkaniemi 61.4% 61.4%    
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk 16.6%   16.6%  
Domi-Suzuki 7.9% 7.9%    
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 6.9% 6.9%    
Poehling-Thompson 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 4.0% 2.7% 1.3%  
Totals   82.1% 17.9%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Thompson 80.0% 80.0%    
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 9.6% 9.6%    
Tatar-Thompson 3.4% 3.4%    
Poehling-Danault 2.0% 2.0%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 2.9% 2.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Kovalchuk 48.4% 48.4%    
Lehkonen 12.2% 0.3%   11.9%
Tatar 9.6% 9.6%    
Suzuki-Lehkonen-Tatar 8.6%   8.6%  
Tatar-Suzuki 5.0% 4.1% 0.9%  
Others 16.2% 10.9% 2.1% 3.2%
Totals   73.2% 11.6% 15.1%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 51.8% 51.8%    
Thompson 17.6%     17.6%
Kotkaniemi-Cousins 7.0% 7.0%    
Danault 6.5%     6.5%
Kotkaniemi-Weise 6.2% 6.2%    
Others 10.9% 10.9%    
Totals   75.9%   24.1%
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Weise 51.1% 51.1%    
Poehling 17.3%     17.3%
Domi-Kovalchuk 7.7% 7.7%    
Lehkonen 7.4% 0.6%   6.9%
Poehling-Cousins 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 13.0% 13.0%    
Totals   75.8%   24.2%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 44.2% 44.2%    
Danault 15.6% 0.4%   15.3%
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 11.1%   11.1%  
Suzuki 9.2% 9.2%    
Thompson 4.8% 0.4%   4.4%
Others 15.1% 15.1%    
Totals   69.3% 11.1% 19.7%
63 Peca
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Cousins 89.9% 89.9%    
Domi-Suzuki 8.8% 8.8%    
Thompson-Weise 1.0% 1.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Suzuki 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Kovalchuk 54.8% 54.8%    
Danault 10.8% 10.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Lehkonen 9.8%   9.8%  
Danault-Suzuki 5.7% 4.6% 1.1%  
Kotkaniemi 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 15.3% 15.3%    
Totals   89.2% 10.8%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 50.9% 50.9%    
Scandella 17.1% 8.1%   9.0%
Petry 13.7% 6.6% 1.6% 5.4%
  10.3% 3.0% 7.3%  
Kulak 3.9% 2.4% 1.4%  
Others 4.2% 2.1%   2.1%
Totals   73.1% 10.3% 16.5%
20 Fleury
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 73.7% 73.7%    
Petry 15.9% 2.3%   13.6%
Scandella 5.0% 5.0%    
Weber 3.9%     3.9%
Scandella-Weber 1.0% 1.0%    
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   82.5%   17.5%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 51.5% 50.7% 0.8%  
  16.1% 8.5% 7.6%  
Weber 13.0% 6.3% 1.6% 5.1%
Fleury 8.3% 1.2%   7.1%
Mete 6.7% 6.7%    
Others 4.4% 4.4%    
Totals   77.8% 9.9% 12.3%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 68.9% 67.9% 1.0%  
Weber 21.8% 10.3%   11.5%
Fleury 3.5% 3.5%    
Mete 3.0% 3.0%    
Mete-Weber 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   87.5% 1.0% 11.5%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 76.6% 76.6%    
Petry 10.6% 10.6%    
  5.5% 5.5%    
Scandella 3.6% 3.6%    
Scandella-Weber 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Fleury 81.7% 81.7%    
Petry 8.8% 8.8%    
Weber 7.9% 5.0% 2.9%  
Mete 1.5% 1.5%    
Scandella 0.1% 0.1%    
Totals   97.1% 2.9%  
Back to main page