Game #50 - January 18, 2020 - Vegas 4 at Montreal 5 (SO)
Game #50 - January 18, 2020
  Vegas   4   at     Montreal   5     (SO)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
13 Domi14 Suzuki40 Armia
 13:04 13:04 0:00 0:00 E
90 Tatar24 Danault17 Kovalchuk
 11:52 11:52 0:00 0:00 +1
25 Poehling15 Kotkaniemi62 Lehkonen
 11:00 11:00 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson22 Weise
 7:20 7:13 0:07 0:00 +2
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 3:18 1:27 0:00 1:51 E
13 Domi17 Kovalchuk
 2:28 2:28 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
 2:02 0:00 0:00 2:02 E
62 Lehkonen24 Danault17 Kovalchuk
 2:00 2:00 0:00 0:00 -1
21 Cousins44 Thompson62 Lehkonen
 1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 15 Kotkaniemi - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:11 0:08 1:03 0:00 E
Others 9:32 8:33 0:57 0:02 -2
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
28 Scandella26 Petry
 18:12 17:35 0:07 0:30 -2
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 17:19 16:03 0:00 1:16 E
77 Kulak53 Mete
 14:15 14:15 0:00 0:00 +2
26 Petry
 4:05 3:02 1:03 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot26 Petry
 2:30 1:29 0:00 1:01 E
  8 Chiarot
 1:44 1:44 0:00 0:00 E
77 Kulak26 Petry
 1:25 1:25 0:00 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 1:19 0:22 0:57 0:00 E
53 Mete28 Scandella
 1:04 0:24 0:00 0:40 E
Others 3:07 2:39 0:00 0:28 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 13MD
14NS
40JA		 90TT
24PD
17IK		 25RP
15JK
62AL		 21NC
44NT
22DW		 24PD
62AL		 13MD
17IK		 40JA
44NT		 62AL
24PD
17IK		 28MS
26JP		 8BC
6SW		 77BK
53VM		 26JP 8BC
26JP
81 Marchessault - 20 Stephenson - 19 Smith 9:07 0:42 0:51 0:03 1:03   0:24   7:39 2:16 0:34   0:47
67 Pacioretty - 26 Stastny - 61 Stone 1:52 8:32 0:02         0:34 2:11 8:41 0:08   0:16
28 Carrier - 21 Eakin - 89 Tuch 0:08 0:04 3:56 1:01         0:47 1:20 4:27   0:50
92 Nosek - 10 Roy - 75 Reaves 0:04 1:05 0:36 2:31       0:10 2:22 0:15 2:29    
92 Nosek - 21 Eakin - 89 Tuch   0:05 3:54 0:01         0:23 1:19 2:57    
28 Carrier - 10 Roy - 75 Reaves 0:37 0:03 0:03 3:14         0:55 0:03 2:40    
67 Pacioretty - 26 Stastny - 61 Stone - 89 Tuch         0:48   1:12     1:12     0:02
3 McNabb - 88 Schmidt 3:08 7:22 3:17 1:26       0:10 6:28 6:55 2:09   0:08
22 Holden - 27 Theodore 5:38 2:29 2:00 1:39         4:41 3:22 4:22    
5 Engelland - 14 Hague 2:08 0:11 2:22 3:16         2:42 1:06 4:40   1:09
14 Hague - 27 Theodore 1:02 0:49 1:21 0:10 0:53   0:36   0:25 1:39 1:46   0:59
27 Theodore         1:29 1:04 1:12 0:37 0:44 1:12   2:07  
22 Holden - 88 Schmidt 0:11 0:30           0:32 1:15 0:50   1:11 0:12
27 Theodore - 88 Schmidt 0:28 0:31 1:10         0:41 1:04 1:49 0:10    
88 Schmidt         0:46 1:24           0:47 0:02

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 73.6% 73.6%    
Kovalchuk 13.9% 13.9%    
Kovalchuk-Cousins-Armia 4.2%   4.2%  
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 1.8% 1.8%    
Suzuki-Kovalchuk 1.4% 1.4%    
Others 5.1% 3.8% 1.1% 0.2%
Totals   94.5% 5.4% 0.2%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Armia 79.0% 79.0%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Tatar 7.2% 0.8% 6.4%  
Armia 4.6% 4.6%    
Cousins-Armia 1.9% 1.9%    
Tatar-Armia 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 5.4% 5.2%   0.2%
Totals   93.4% 6.4% 0.2%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Lehkonen 74.2% 74.2%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 8.0% 0.9% 7.1%  
Cousins-Lehkonen 4.9% 4.9%    
Cousins-Weise 3.0% 3.0%    
Tatar-Kovalchuk 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 6.9% 6.9%    
Totals   92.9% 7.1%  
17 Kovalchuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 62.0% 62.0%    
Domi 12.9% 12.9%    
Lehkonen-Danault 10.4% 10.4%    
Domi-Cousins-Armia 3.9%   3.9%  
Tatar-Kotkaniemi 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 8.5% 7.5% 1.0%  
Totals   95.0% 5.0%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 65.1% 64.1% 1.0%  
Thompson-Lehkonen 10.8% 10.8%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Armia 6.7%   6.7%  
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 6.5% 6.5%    
Kotkaniemi-Weise 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 7.0% 7.0%    
Totals   92.3% 7.7%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 80.0% 78.7% 1.3%  
Lehkonen-Thompson 6.2% 6.2%    
Tatar-Thompson 5.3% 5.3%    
Cousins-Kotkaniemi 4.9% 4.9%    
Cousins-Suzuki 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 1.8% 1.8%    
Totals   98.7% 1.3%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Kovalchuk 58.8% 58.8%    
Lehkonen 16.4% 7.2%   9.2%
Lehkonen-Kovalchuk 9.9% 9.9%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 5.9% 0.7% 5.2%  
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 1.7% 1.7%    
Others 7.4% 6.4% 1.0%  
Totals   84.6% 6.2% 9.2%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 87.1% 87.1%    
Thompson-Lehkonen 6.9% 6.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk 1.6% 1.6%    
Danault-Kovalchuk 1.3% 1.3%    
Suzuki-Lehkonen 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   100.0%    
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 73.4% 73.4%    
Thompson 11.4%     11.4%
Suzuki 4.3% 4.3%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Cousins 4.2%   4.2%  
Cousins-Suzuki 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 4.9% 3.7% 1.1%  
Totals   83.2% 5.3% 11.4%
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Weise 55.6% 54.7% 0.9%  
Armia 15.4%     15.4%
Cousins-Lehkonen 9.2% 9.2%    
Poehling-Lehkonen 6.6% 6.6%    
Lehkonen-Weise 4.3% 4.3%    
Others 8.8% 8.8%    
Totals   83.7% 0.9% 15.4%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 52.8% 52.8%    
Danault 15.9% 7.0%   8.9%
Danault-Kovalchuk 9.6% 9.6%    
Cousins-Thompson 5.8% 5.8%    
Poehling-Thompson 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 11.7% 11.7%    
Totals   91.1%   8.9%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Kovalchuk 80.1% 80.1%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Danault 8.0% 0.9% 7.1%  
Thompson-Weise 3.3% 3.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk 2.9% 2.9%    
Suzuki-Armia 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 3.7% 3.7%    
Totals   92.9% 7.1%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 85.9% 79.7%   6.3%
  6.5% 1.8% 4.7%  
Scandella 3.7% 3.7%    
Petry 2.9% 2.9%    
Chiarot-Petry 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   89.0% 4.7% 6.3%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 76.0% 70.4%   5.6%
Petry 11.0% 6.5%   4.5%
  7.6% 7.6%    
Scandella 2.4% 0.4%   2.0%
Mete 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 1.5% 1.5%    
Totals   87.9%   12.1%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 67.7% 65.4% 0.4% 1.9%
  15.2% 11.3% 3.9%  
Chiarot 9.3% 5.5%   3.8%
Kulak 5.3% 5.3%    
Weber 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   90.0% 4.3% 5.6%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 86.5% 83.6% 0.6% 2.4%
Mete 5.1% 1.9%   3.2%
Weber 3.6% 3.6%    
Chiarot 2.6% 0.4%   2.2%
Kulak 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   91.7% 0.6% 7.8%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 90.5% 90.5%    
Scandella 6.8% 2.5%   4.2%
Chiarot 2.3% 2.3%    
Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   95.8%   4.2%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 87.2% 87.2%    
Petry 8.7% 8.7%    
Scandella 2.9% 2.9%    
Chiarot 1.3% 1.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page