Game #51 - January 27, 2020 - Washington 4 at Montreal 2
Game #51 - January 27, 2020
  Washington   4   at     Montreal   2

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault17 Kovalchuk
11:44 11:44 0:00 0:00 -1
13 Domi14 Suzuki40 Armia
10:39 10:39 0:00 0:00 E
25 Poehling15 Kotkaniemi62 Lehkonen
7:28 7:28 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson22 Weise
6:28 6:28 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi - 17 Kovalchuk - 21 Cousins - 40 Armia 2:22 0:26 1:56 0:00 E
14 Suzuki - 15 Kotkaniemi - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:58 0:00 1:58 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
1:44 0:00 0:00 1:44 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
1:42 0:00 0:00 1:42 E
62 Lehkonen44 Thompson22 Weise
1:31 1:31 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi14 Suzuki17 Kovalchuk
1:19 1:19 0:00 0:00 E
25 Poehling62 Lehkonen
1:09 0:00 0:00 1:09 E
15 Kotkaniemi - 17 Kovalchuk - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:01 0:00 1:01 0:00 E
Others 10:55 9:27 1:05 0:23 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
18:49 15:03 0:00 3:46 -1
28 Scandella26 Petry
12:13 11:04 0:00 1:09 E
53 Mete77 Kulak
10:08 10:08 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
3:21 0:00 3:21 0:00 E
77 Kulak26 Petry
3:06 3:06 0:00 0:00 +1
  6 Weber
3:00 0:26 2:34 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot28 Scandella
2:49 2:49 0:00 0:00 E
53 Mete28 Scandella
2:26 2:26 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
2:21 2:13 0:05 0:03 -1
Others 1:47 1:47 0:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
17IK
13MD
14NS
40JA
25RP
15JK
62AL
21NC
44NT
22DW
13MD
17IK
21NC
40JA
8BC
6SW
28MS
26JP
53VM
77BK
26JP 77BK
26JP
6SW 8BC
28MS
53VM
28MS
26JP
6SW
13 Vrana - 92 Kuznetsov - 77 Oshie 5:24 1:43   0:37   4:56 3:10 0:41   0:45   1:08    
62 Hagelin - 20 Eller - 72 Boyd 1:22 0:51 3:55 2:42   0:36 1:27 5:33   0:13   0:20 0:50  
14 Panik - 19 Backstrom - 43 Wilson 1:03 4:28 1:57     5:53 0:59 0:14       0:54 0:30  
28 Leipsic - 26 Dowd - 21 Hathaway 2:13 0:38 0:59 2:18   0:58 1:32 2:16   0:52   0:09 0:30 0:09
13 Vrana - 19 Backstrom - 43 Wilson - 77 Oshie           3:29                
20 Eller - 43 Wilson         0:21       0:44   1:22     0:05
62 Hagelin - 26 Dowd         1:18       1:07   0:56      
6 Kempny - 74 Carlson 3:04 3:08 1:37 2:41   3:16 3:07 2:11   1:21   0:48 0:39 1:16
3 Jensen - 9 Orlov 4:08 2:51 1:55 1:28   4:49 2:41 3:44   0:24     0:44 0:26
33 Gudas - 34 Siegenthaler 1:10 1:42 2:45 1:15 0:54 2:01 2:13 2:20 1:29 0:39 0:57 0:22 0:31  
3 Jensen - 6 Kempny 0:26 1:21     1:20 1:53 0:22   1:52   1:55     0:02
9 Orlov - 74 Carlson 0:36 0:03   0:42 0:08 0:36   1:22   0:30 0:08 1:23 0:25 0:25
74 Carlson           3:30 0:24             0:03
9 Orlov - 33 Gudas 0:37 1:16 0:26 0:04   1:48 0:42 0:10       0:16    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 63.2% 63.2%    
Kovalchuk-Cousins-Armia 14.0% 2.6% 11.5%  
Suzuki-Kovalchuk 7.8% 7.8%    
Kovalchuk-Danault-Tatar 5.3% 5.3%    
Danault-Kovalchuk 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 6.9% 6.6% 0.3%  
Totals   88.2% 11.8%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Armia 64.3% 64.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Tatar 11.9%   11.9%  
Domi-Kovalchuk 7.9% 7.9%    
Danault-Armia-Tatar 3.8%   3.8%  
Cousins-Weise 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 10.0% 7.1% 2.2% 0.6%
Totals   81.5% 17.9% 0.6%
15 Kotkaniemi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Lehkonen 56.8% 56.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 15.0%   15.0%  
Kovalchuk-Danault-Tatar 7.7%   7.7%  
Poehling-Cousins 6.3% 6.3%    
Tatar-Kovalchuk 5.6% 5.6%    
Others 8.6% 6.8% 1.8%  
Totals   75.5% 24.5%  
17 Kovalchuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 55.1% 55.1%    
Domi-Cousins-Armia 11.1% 2.0% 9.1%  
Domi-Suzuki 6.2% 6.2%    
Kotkaniemi-Danault-Tatar 4.8%   4.8%  
Domi-Danault-Tatar 4.2% 4.2%    
Others 18.6% 18.6%    
Totals   86.1% 13.9%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 49.9% 49.9%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Armia 18.3% 3.3% 14.9%  
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 6.4% 6.4%    
Thompson-Kovalchuk 5.4% 5.4%    
Thompson-Lehkonen 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 14.8% 12.0% 2.8%  
Totals   82.3% 17.7%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 68.4% 68.4%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 16.0% 16.0%    
Poehling-Thompson 8.3% 8.3%    
Cousins-Suzuki 3.7% 3.7%    
Domi-Suzuki 1.1% 1.1%    
Others 2.5% 2.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Kovalchuk 58.8% 58.8%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Tatar 9.8%   9.8%  
Lehkonen 8.7%     8.7%
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk-Tatar 5.1%   5.1%  
Domi-Kovalchuk-Tatar 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 13.1% 9.5% 3.6%  
Totals   72.8% 18.5% 8.7%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kotkaniemi-Lehkonen 69.9% 69.9%    
Lehkonen 10.8%     10.8%
Kotkaniemi-Cousins 7.8% 7.8%    
Thompson-Weise 7.3% 7.3%    
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk 2.0% 2.0%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   89.2%   10.8%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Suzuki 63.2% 63.2%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Cousins 14.0% 2.6% 11.5%  
Thompson 10.1%     10.1%
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 3.8%   3.8%  
Cousins-Thompson 1.8% 1.8%    
Others 7.1% 5.2% 1.3% 0.6%
Totals   72.8% 16.5% 10.7%
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Weise 48.7% 48.7%    
Armia 12.8%     12.8%
Lehkonen-Weise 11.4% 11.4%    
Poehling-Weise 5.9% 5.9%    
Cousins-Kovalchuk 5.3% 5.3%    
Others 15.8% 13.7%   2.1%
Totals   85.1%   14.9%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Kotkaniemi 56.9% 56.9%    
Danault 13.2%     13.2%
Thompson-Weise 11.6% 11.6%    
Poehling 8.8%     8.8%
Cousins-Thompson 5.2% 5.2%    
Others 4.3% 2.2%   2.2%
Totals   75.9%   24.1%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Kovalchuk 63.3% 63.3%    
Suzuki-Kotkaniemi-Danault 10.6%   10.6%  
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk-Danault 5.5%   5.5%  
Domi-Kovalchuk-Danault 4.9% 4.9%    
Kotkaniemi-Kovalchuk 4.0% 4.0%    
Others 11.8% 6.2% 5.6%  
Totals   78.3% 21.7%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 77.5% 62.0%   15.5%
  12.4% 1.8% 10.6%  
Petry 9.7% 9.1% 0.3% 0.2%
Chiarot-Mete 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   73.4% 10.9% 15.7%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 83.8% 67.0%   16.8%
Scandella 12.5% 12.5%    
Kulak 1.9% 1.9%    
Mete 1.3% 1.3%    
Mete-Weber 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   83.2%   16.8%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 57.9% 52.4%   5.4%
  15.9%   15.9%  
Kulak 14.7% 14.7%    
Weber 11.1% 10.5% 0.4% 0.2%
Mete 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   78.1% 16.3% 5.7%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 66.6% 60.4%   6.3%
Chiarot 15.4% 15.4%    
Mete 13.3% 13.3%    
Kulak 4.7% 4.7%    
Totals   93.7%   6.3%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 77.6% 77.6%    
Scandella 18.6% 18.6%    
Chiarot 2.2% 2.2%    
Chiarot-Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Petry 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   100.0%    
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 69.8% 69.8%    
Petry 21.4% 21.4%    
Scandella 6.0% 6.0%    
Chiarot 2.9% 2.9%    
Totals   100.0%    

Back to main page