Game #52 - January 30, 2020 - Montreal 3 at Buffalo 1
Game #52 - January 30, 2020
  Montreal   3   at     Buffalo   1

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   

Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
13:38 13:38 0:00 0:00 +1
17 Kovalchuk14 Suzuki40 Armia
10:28 10:28 0:00 0:00 +1
25 Poehling44 Thompson22 Weise
7:07 7:07 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins13 Domi62 Lehkonen
7:06 7:06 0:00 0:00 E
21 Cousins13 Domi17 Kovalchuk
3:01 3:01 0:00 0:00 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
2:47 0:00 0:00 2:47 E
62 Lehkonen14 Suzuki40 Armia
2:25 2:25 0:00 0:00 E
Others 13:28 9:53 2:00 1:35 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
21:16 18:30 0:00 2:46 +2
77 Kulak26 Petry
20:03 20:03 0:00 0:00 E
28 Scandella53 Mete
11:43 11:43 0:00 0:00 +1
28 Scandella26 Petry
2:06 0:30 0:00 1:36 E
Others 4:52 2:52 2:00 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG
17IK
14NS
40JA
25RP
44NT
22DW
21NC
13MD
62AL
21NC
13MD
17IK
40JA
44NT
62AL
14NS
40JA
8BC
6SW
77BK
26JP
28MS
53VM
28MS
26JP
23 Reinhart - 9 Eichel - 71 Rodrigues 0:52 1:58 0:53 1:59 0:27   1:43 5:28 3:03 0:06 0:11
53 Skinner - 90 Johansson - 67 Frolik 1:00 0:57 1:16 1:38 2:13     0:57 3:19 3:05 0:04
23 Reinhart - 9 Eichel - 53 Skinner 0:33 1:36 0:30 1:05 0:05   0:05 1:56 2:36 0:52  
13 Vesey - 27 Lazar - 43 Sheary 1:10   2:01 0:56 0:01     1:06 2:00 1:00  
90 Johansson - 9 Eichel - 23 Reinhart 0:18   0:36     1:49   2:18   0:18 0:56
28 Girgensons - 22 Larsson - 21 Okposo 2:27 0:40         0:03 1:23 0:32 1:21  
13 Vesey - 22 Larsson - 28 Girgensons   1:45 0:07         1:06 1:41 0:20  
10 Jokiharju - 19 McCabe 4:37 2:14 1:06 1:53 0:26   1:43 4:37 3:10 5:45 0:18
26 Dahlin - 55 Ristolainen 0:57 3:56 0:03 1:34   1:49   5:54 2:57 1:04 0:56
33 Miller - 62 Montour 2:08 0:42 1:44 2:36     0:05 2:58 5:09 1:23  
55 Ristolainen - 62 Montour 4:04 0:58 1:26 0:43     0:32 3:14 2:29 2:38  
26 Dahlin - 33 Miller 0:48 1:48 1:23   2:34   0:01 1:52 4:52 0:06  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)


For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 79.8% 79.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 4.9%   4.9%  
Tatar-Domi 3.1% 3.1%    
Lehkonen-Danault 3.0% 3.0%    
Tatar-Suzuki 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 7.3% 7.3%    
Totals   95.1% 4.9%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Lehkonen 44.7% 44.7%    
Cousins-Kovalchuk 19.0% 19.0%    
Kovalchuk-Cousins-Armia 5.4%   5.4%  
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 5.1% 5.1%    
Tatar-Cousins 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 21.3% 19.3% 2.0%  
Totals   92.7% 7.3%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kovalchuk-Armia 58.7% 58.7%    
Lehkonen-Armia 13.6% 13.6%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 4.7%   4.7%  
Kovalchuk-Domi 4.6% 4.6%    
Lehkonen 3.7%     3.7%
Others 14.8% 13.6% 0.7% 0.6%
Totals   90.4% 5.3% 4.3%
17 Kovalchuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 61.9% 61.9%    
Cousins-Domi 17.9% 17.9%    
Domi-Cousins-Armia 5.0%   5.0%  
Suzuki-Domi 4.8% 4.8%    
Domi-Armia 2.9% 2.9%    
Others 7.5% 7.5%    
Totals   95.0% 5.0%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Lehkonen 53.5% 53.5%    
Domi-Kovalchuk 22.7% 22.7%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Armia 6.4%   6.4%  
Tatar-Domi 5.4% 5.4%    
Domi-Gallagher 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 9.7% 7.3% 2.4%  
Totals   91.2% 8.8%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Thompson 74.1% 74.1%    
Lehkonen-Thompson 6.4% 6.4%    
Danault 4.7%     4.7%
Lehkonen-Domi 4.3% 4.3%    
Poehling-Suzuki 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 6.9% 6.9%    
Totals   95.3%   4.7%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 80.6% 80.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 4.9%   4.9%  
Lehkonen-Gallagher 3.1% 3.1%    
Weise 2.7%     2.7%
Lehkonen 2.2%     2.2%
Others 6.6% 6.0%   0.6%
Totals   89.7% 4.9% 5.4%
25 Poehling
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 83.2% 83.2%    
Thompson-Armia 5.1% 5.1%    
Suzuki-Weise 3.9% 3.9%    
Danault-Gallagher 1.8% 1.8%    
Domi-Weise 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 4.5% 4.5%    
Totals   100.0%    
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 58.1% 58.1%    
Thompson 15.4%     15.4%
Lehkonen-Suzuki 13.4% 13.4%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Cousins 4.7%   4.7%  
Kovalchuk-Domi 2.7% 2.7%    
Others 5.6% 5.6%    
Totals   79.8% 4.7% 15.4%
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Poehling-Weise 53.8% 53.8%    
Armia 21.0%     21.0%
Domi-Lehkonen 5.4% 5.4%    
Lehkonen-Weise 4.7% 4.7%    
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 11.7% 10.2% 1.5%  
Totals   77.5% 1.5% 21.0%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Domi 51.7% 51.7%    
Suzuki-Armia 17.6% 17.6%    
Domi-Thompson 5.2% 5.2%    
Suzuki 4.9%     4.9%
Thompson-Weise 4.5% 4.5%    
Others 16.1% 13.5%   2.7%
Totals   92.5%   7.5%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 83.2% 83.2%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 5.1%   5.1%  
Domi-Cousins 4.4% 4.4%    
Domi-Gallagher 3.3% 3.3%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 2.1% 2.1%    
Totals   94.9% 5.1%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 90.0% 78.3%   11.7%
  3.6%   3.6%  
Kulak 2.8% 2.8%    
Scandella 2.4% 2.4%    
Petry 1.2% 1.2%    
Totals   84.7% 3.6% 11.7%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 94.0% 81.7%   12.2%
Petry 2.5% 1.1% 1.4%  
Kulak 1.8% 1.8%    
Scandella 1.5% 1.5%    
Mete 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   86.4% 1.4% 12.2%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 83.3% 83.3%    
Scandella 8.7% 2.1%   6.6%
  3.5%   3.5%  
Chiarot 2.4% 1.0% 1.3%  
Weber 1.2% 1.2%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   88.6% 4.8% 6.6%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 79.2% 79.2%    
Petry 14.2% 3.4%   10.8%
Weber 3.8% 3.8%    
Chiarot 2.3% 2.3%    
Kulak 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   89.2%   10.8%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 97.5% 97.5%    
Petry 1.9% 1.9%    
Chiarot 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   100.0%    
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 94.6% 94.6%    
Weber 3.1% 3.1%    
Chiarot 1.9% 1.9%    
Scandella 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    

Back to main page