Game #53 - February 1, 2020 - Florida 0 at Montreal 4
Game #53 - February 1, 2020
  Florida   0   at     Montreal   4
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
17 Kovalchuk14 Suzuki40 Armia
 12:32 12:32 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen13 Domi43 Weal
 7:32 7:32 0:00 0:00 +1
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 7:28 7:28 0:00 0:00 +1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 6:13 0:04 0:00 6:09 E
21 Cousins44 Thompson22 Weise
 5:52 5:50 0:02 0:00 E
40 Armia44 Thompson
 3:10 0:00 0:00 3:10 E
90 Tatar13 Domi11 Gallagher
 2:05 2:05 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 1:52 0:00 1:52 0:00 E
22 Weise44 Thompson
 1:26 0:00 0:00 1:26 E
13 Domi - 17 Kovalchuk - 40 Armia - 43 Weal 1:09 0:00 1:09 0:00 E
62 Lehkonen24 Danault43 Weal
 1:05 1:05 0:00 0:00 E
Others 9:36 8:33 0:09 0:54 E
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 22:56 15:57 0:00 6:59 E
77 Kulak26 Petry
 14:05 14:05 0:00 0:00 +3
28 Scandella53 Mete
 11:14 11:14 0:00 0:00 E
28 Scandella26 Petry
 4:17 0:16 0:00 4:01 E
26 Petry
 1:52 0:00 1:52 0:00 E
53 Mete26 Petry
 1:40 1:01 0:00 0:39 E
  6 Weber
 1:14 0:00 1:14 0:00 E
77 Kulak53 Mete
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
Others 1:38 1:32 0:06 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 17IK
14NS
40JA		 62AL
13MD
43JW		 90TT
24PD
11BG		 24PD
62AL		 21NC
44NT
22DW		 40JA
44NT		 90TT
13MD
11BG		 8BC
6SW		 77BK
26JP		 28MS
53VM		 28MS
26JP
11 Huberdeau - 16 Barkov - 63 Dadonov 1:57 0:12 3:57       0:37 6:28 0:52 0:11  
68 Hoffman - 14 Toninato - 77 Vatrano 2:00 2:39 0:04   0:29   0:02 0:34 1:31 3:40  
55 Acciari - 21 Trocheck - 10 Connolly 2:41 0:55 0:41         0:23 4:27 0:27  
7 Sceviour - 9 Boyle 0:36 0:21     2:43     1:01 1:28 2:33  
11 Huberdeau - 21 Trocheck - 68 Hoffman - 63 Dadonov       2:21   1:04   2:42     2:31
11 Huberdeau - 55 Acciari - 63 Dadonov 1:23 1:40 0:36         2:54 0:48    
7 Sceviour - 55 Acciari             0:10 0:10   0:29  
14 Toninato - 77 Vatrano 0:10       0:48       0:03 0:45  
6 Stralman - 61 Stillman 3:53 0:12 2:31   1:04     3:39 4:15 1:15  
5 Ekblad - 19 Matheson 3:26 2:36 2:10 0:37 0:03 0:16 0:58 6:10 2:35 2:05 0:22
3 Yandle       4:31   1:25   5:34     2:35
2 Brown - 3 Yandle 1:58 3:03 1:00   0:04   0:02 1:39 2:48 1:50  
6 Stralman - 13 Pysyk - 61 Stillman 0:36       0:57   0:53 0:26 0:20 2:47  
5 Ekblad       1:05   1:29 0:02 1:22     1:08
2 Brown - 3 Yandle - 13 Pysyk 0:01   0:03   0:42     1:22 0:20 0:37  
3 Yandle - 5 Ekblad 0:54 0:41 0:36         1:14 0:51    
5 Ekblad - 13 Pysyk - 19 Matheson 0:20 0:21     1:04     0:11 1:07 0:34  

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 51.7% 51.7%    
Tatar-Domi 14.4% 14.4%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 12.9%   12.9%  
Cousins-Thompson 5.7% 5.7%    
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 5.5% 5.5%    
Others 9.7% 8.7% 1.0%  
Totals   86.0% 14.0%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weal 57.1% 57.1%    
Tatar-Gallagher 15.8% 15.8%    
Kovalchuk-Armia-Weal 8.7%   8.7%  
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 5.4% 5.4%    
Kovalchuk-Armia 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 9.4% 8.7% 0.6%  
Totals   90.6% 9.4%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kovalchuk-Armia 68.6% 68.6%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 10.2%   10.2%  
Kovalchuk-Gallagher 4.4% 4.4%    
Kovalchuk-Domi 3.9% 3.9%    
Cousins-Weise 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 9.2% 8.3% 0.4% 0.5%
Totals   88.9% 10.6% 0.5%
17 Kovalchuk
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 73.9% 73.9%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 6.8%   6.8%  
Suzuki-Gallagher 4.7% 4.7%    
Suzuki-Domi 4.2% 4.2%    
Thompson-Armia 3.6% 3.6%    
Others 6.7% 6.2% 0.5%  
Totals   92.7% 7.3%  
21 Cousins
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Thompson-Weise 69.4% 69.0% 0.4%  
Thompson-Gallagher 9.7% 9.7%    
Suzuki-Weise 7.9% 7.9%    
Domi-Weal 5.3% 5.3%    
Danault-Gallagher 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 4.3% 4.3%    
Totals   99.6% 0.4%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Thompson 70.4% 70.0% 0.4%  
Thompson 17.2%     17.2%
Cousins-Suzuki 8.0% 8.0%    
Cousins-Domi 1.8% 1.8%    
Lehkonen-Domi 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 1.0% 1.0%    
Totals   82.4% 0.4% 17.2%
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 39.6% 39.6%    
Lehkonen 33.0% 0.4%   32.7%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 9.9%   9.9%  
Lehkonen-Weal 5.8% 5.8%    
Tatar-Armia 3.4% 3.4%    
Others 8.3% 5.8% 0.4% 2.1%
Totals   55.0% 10.3% 34.8%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Kovalchuk-Suzuki 63.7% 63.7%    
Thompson 16.1%     16.1%
Domi-Kovalchuk-Weal 5.8%   5.8%  
Tatar-Danault 3.2% 3.2%    
Kovalchuk-Thompson 3.1% 3.1%    
Others 8.0% 7.5%   0.5%
Totals   77.5% 5.8% 16.6%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Domi 69.8% 69.8%    
Domi-Kovalchuk-Armia 10.6%   10.6%  
Lehkonen-Danault 10.0% 10.0%    
Cousins-Domi 4.2% 4.2%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.8% 2.8%    
Others 2.6% 1.9% 0.8%  
Totals   88.6% 11.4%  
44 Thompson
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Cousins-Weise 45.0% 44.8% 0.3%  
Armia 24.3%     24.3%
Weise 11.0%     11.0%
Cousins-Gallagher 6.3% 6.3%    
Kovalchuk-Armia 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 8.7% 4.3%   4.3%
Totals   60.1% 0.3% 39.6%
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Weal 46.6% 46.6%    
Danault 38.5% 0.4%   38.0%
Danault-Weal 6.7% 6.7%    
Suzuki-Weal 1.9% 1.9%    
Thompson 1.8%     1.8%
Others 4.6% 4.6%    
Totals   60.2%   39.8%
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 58.0% 58.0%    
Domi-Gallagher 16.2% 16.2%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 14.5%   14.5%  
Danault-Armia 4.9% 4.9%    
Suzuki-Armia 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 3.2% 3.2%    
Totals   85.5% 14.5%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 93.7% 65.1%   28.5%
  5.0%   5.0%  
Scandella 0.9% 0.9%    
Chiarot-Scandella 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   66.4% 5.0% 28.5%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 94.8% 65.9%   28.9%
Scandella 3.1% 3.1%    
Petry 1.7% 1.4% 0.3%  
Scandella-Weber 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   70.9% 0.3% 28.9%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 63.0% 63.0%    
Scandella 19.2% 1.2%   18.0%
  8.4%   8.4%  
Mete 7.5% 4.5%   2.9%
Chiarot 1.9% 1.6% 0.3%  
Others 0.1%   0.1%  
Totals   70.3% 8.8% 20.9%
28 Scandella
Partner Total EV PP SH
Mete 67.1% 67.1%    
Petry 25.6% 1.6%   24.0%
Chiarot 4.5% 4.5%    
Weber 1.3% 1.3%    
Kulak 0.7% 0.7%    
Others 0.8% 0.6% 0.2%  
Totals   75.8% 0.2% 24.0%
53 Mete
Partner Total EV PP SH
Scandella 80.4% 80.4%    
Petry 11.9% 7.3%   4.7%
Kulak 7.6% 7.6%    
Totals   95.3%   4.7%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 92.0% 92.0%    
Mete 7.0% 7.0%    
Scandella 0.8% 0.8%    
Scandella-Petry 0.2%   0.2%  
Totals   99.8% 0.2%  
Back to main page