Game #65 - February 25, 2020 - Vancouver 4 at Montreal 3 (OT)
Game #65 - February 25, 2020
  Vancouver   4   at     Montreal   3     (OT)
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 14:13 14:13 0:00 0:00 +1
41 Byron13 Domi43 Weal
 13:45 13:45 0:00 0:00 +1
92 Drouin14 Suzuki40 Armia
 12:31 12:31 0:00 0:00 -1
62 Lehkonen71 Evans22 Weise
 8:38 8:38 0:00 0:00 E
13 Domi41 Byron
 1:35 1:35 0:00 0:00 -1
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 1:08 0:00 0:00 1:08 E
Others 9:45 7:14 2:00 0:31 +1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
77 Kulak26 Petry
 20:01 20:01 0:00 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 17:54 16:21 0:00 1:33 +3
27 Alzner32 Folin
 13:21 13:21 0:00 0:00 E
26 Petry
 2:33 1:35 0:58 0:00 -1
  8 Chiarot77 Kulak
 1:13 1:13 0:00 0:00 E
27 Alzner  6 Weber
 1:04 1:04 0:00 0:00 E
32 Folin  6 Weber
 1:02 1:02 0:00 0:00 E
Others 4:27 3:19 1:02 0:06 -1

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 41PB
13MD
43JW		 92JD
14NS
40JA		 62AL
71JE
22DW		 77BK
26JP		 8BC
6SW		 27KA
32CF		 26JP
21 Eriksson - 53 Horvat - 70 Pearson 3:24 6:52 2:33   9:38 2:38 0:37  
40 Pettersson - 9 Miller - 73 Toffoli 6:34 1:51 0:43 1:37 3:25 6:09 1:39  
20 Sutter - 83 Beagle - 64 Motte 0:37 1:55 2:33 4:06 0:57 1:53 5:52  
26 Roussel - 88 Gaudette - 18 Virtanen 0:36 1:45 3:54 1:00 3:26 2:01 2:41  
8 Tanev - 43 Hughes 6:28 5:53 1:00 2:44 7:38 6:53 1:38 0:02
23 Edler - 51 Stecher 3:35 3:54 5:41 3:11 5:53 2:18 7:32  
5 Fantenberg - 57 Myers 2:59 3:35 4:50 2:32 5:13 5:25 3:26  
43 Hughes           1:15   1:11

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 80.5% 80.5%    
Lehkonen-Danault 4.5% 4.5%    
Drouin-Danault 3.3% 3.3%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 3.1%   3.1%  
Suzuki-Danault 2.7% 2.5% 0.3%  
Others 5.8% 5.4% 0.4%  
Totals   96.2% 3.8%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weal 75.4% 75.4%    
Byron 8.7% 8.7%    
Armia-Weal-Drouin 5.0%   5.0%  
Tatar-Weal 2.7% 2.7%    
Danault-Gallagher 2.6% 2.6%    
Others 5.7% 5.3% 0.4%  
Totals   94.6% 5.4%  
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Armia 85.4% 85.4%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 3.8%   3.8%  
Danault-Gallagher 3.3% 3.0% 0.3%  
Danault-Tatar-Drouin 2.8%   2.8%  
Lehkonen-Armia 2.5% 2.5%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   93.1% 6.9%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Evans 88.2% 88.2%    
Tatar-Evans 4.3% 4.3%    
Lehkonen-Danault 2.7% 2.7%    
Tatar-Danault 2.4% 2.4%    
Lehkonen-Domi 1.5% 1.5%    
Others 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   100.0%    
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 70.7% 70.7%    
Lehkonen 5.6%     5.6%
Lehkonen-Gallagher 4.0% 4.0%    
Drouin-Gallagher 2.9% 2.9%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 2.7%   2.7%  
Others 14.1% 11.8% 2.3%  
Totals   89.3% 5.1% 5.6%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Drouin-Suzuki 82.4% 82.4%    
Domi-Weal-Drouin 6.0%   6.0%  
Byron 3.4%     3.4%
Lehkonen-Evans 2.6% 2.6%    
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 3.1% 3.1%    
Totals   90.6% 6.0% 3.4%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Weal 84.2% 84.2%    
Domi 9.7% 9.7%    
Armia 3.2%     3.2%
Danault-Weal 2.1% 2.1%    
Domi-Gallagher 0.8% 0.8%    
Totals   96.8%   3.2%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Domi 81.8% 81.8%    
Domi-Armia-Drouin 5.5%   5.5%  
Tatar-Domi 2.9% 2.9%    
Lehkonen-Domi 2.4% 2.4%    
Byron-Danault 2.1% 2.1%    
Others 5.5% 5.1% 0.4%  
Totals   94.2% 5.8%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Weise 69.1% 69.1%    
Danault 9.1%     9.1%
Danault-Gallagher 6.4% 6.4%    
Domi-Weal 3.2% 3.2%    
Evans-Armia 3.2% 3.2%    
Others 9.1% 9.1%    
Totals   90.9%   9.1%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Weise 86.5% 86.5%    
Tatar-Weise 4.2% 4.2%    
Lehkonen-Armia 4.0% 4.0%    
Drouin-Armia 2.8% 2.8%    
Drouin-Weise 0.8% 0.8%    
Others 1.7% 1.7%    
Totals   100.0%    
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 83.1% 83.1%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 3.2%   3.2%  
Domi-Weal 2.8% 2.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Drouin 2.4%   2.4%  
Evans-Weise 2.4% 2.4%    
Others 6.0% 6.0%    
Totals   94.4% 5.6%  
92 Drouin
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 82.3% 82.3%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 6.0%   6.0%  
Danault-Gallagher 3.8% 3.8%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 2.7%   2.7%  
Evans-Armia 1.9% 1.9%    
Others 3.2% 2.7% 0.4%  
Totals   90.8% 9.2%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 82.0% 74.9%   7.1%
Alzner 4.9% 4.9%    
Folin 4.7% 4.7%    
  4.5%   4.5%  
Kulak 3.5% 3.5%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   88.4% 4.5% 7.1%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 89.9% 82.1%   7.8%
Kulak 6.1% 6.1%    
Petry 3.0% 2.3% 0.3% 0.5%
Alzner 0.7% 0.7%    
Folin 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   91.5% 0.3% 8.3%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 83.0% 83.0%    
  10.6% 6.6% 4.0%  
Alzner 3.1% 3.1%    
Chiarot 2.5% 1.9% 0.2% 0.4%
Folin 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   95.4% 4.2% 0.4%
27 Alzner
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 87.0% 87.0%    
Weber 6.9% 6.9%    
Petry 4.9% 4.9%    
Chiarot 0.9% 0.9%    
Kulak 0.3% 0.3%    
Totals   100.0%    
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Alzner 86.2% 86.2%    
Weber 6.7% 6.7%    
Kulak 5.8% 5.8%    
Petry 0.9% 0.9%    
Chiarot 0.4% 0.4%    
Totals   100.0%    
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 87.2% 87.2%    
Chiarot 5.3% 5.3%    
Folin 3.9% 3.9%    
Weber 3.3% 3.3%    
Alzner 0.2% 0.2%    
Totals   100.0%    
Back to main page