Game #66 - February 27, 2020 - N.Y. Rangers 5 at Montreal 2
Game #66 - February 27, 2020
  N.Y. Rangers   5   at     Montreal   2
All times below are based on data from NHL.com.               
NHL.com links:
Scoresheet     Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play   
Lines and defensive pairings

Line Time EV PP SH +/-
90 Tatar24 Danault11 Gallagher
 12:29 12:29 0:00 0:00 +1
62 Lehkonen14 Suzuki40 Armia
 9:21 9:21 0:00 0:00 E
41 Byron13 Domi43 Weal
 8:28 8:22 0:00 0:06 -1
54 Hudon71 Evans22 Weise
 6:18 6:18 0:00 0:00 E
11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar 2:37 0:00 2:37 0:00 E
24 Danault62 Lehkonen
 2:28 0:07 0:00 2:21 E
13 Domi - 40 Armia - 43 Weal - 54 Hudon 2:24 0:00 2:24 0:00 E
40 Armia41 Byron
 2:18 0:00 0:00 2:18 E
41 Byron71 Evans22 Weise
 1:55 1:28 0:27 0:00 E
90 Tatar13 Domi11 Gallagher
 1:27 1:27 0:00 0:00 +1
11 Gallagher - 13 Domi - 14 Suzuki - 90 Tatar 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 -1
54 Hudon13 Domi43 Weal
 1:01 1:01 0:00 0:00 -1
Others 8:11 6:48 0:32 0:51 -1
Pair Time EV PP SH +/-
  8 Chiarot  6 Weber
 19:20 16:03 0:00 3:17 E
77 Kulak26 Petry
 16:07 14:45 0:20 1:02 E
27 Alzner32 Folin
 12:43 12:37 0:00 0:06 -1
26 Petry
 2:51 0:00 2:51 0:00 E
  6 Weber
 2:37 0:00 2:37 0:00 E
  8 Chiarot77 Kulak
 1:45 1:38 0:00 0:07 E
77 Kulak32 Folin
 1:07 0:03 0:00 1:04 E
26 Petry  6 Weber
 1:03 1:03 0:00 0:00 -1
Others 2:27 2:15 0:12 0:00 E

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair 90TT
24PD
11BG		 62AL
14NS
40JA		 41PB
13MD
43JW		 54CH
71JE
22DW		 11BG
14NS
24PD
90TT		 24PD
62AL		 13MD
40JA
43JW
54CH		 40JA
41PB		 8BC
6SW		 77BK
26JP		 27KA
32CF		 26JP 6SW
48 Lemieux - 14 McKegg - 12 Gauthier 1:25 0:06 0:33 4:02         1:53 3:08 1:40    
20 Kreider - 93 Zibanejad - 72 Chytil 4:07   0:47           4:43 0:17 0:18    
33 Di Giuseppe - 21 Howden - 24 Kakko   0:25 3:24 0:58         0:28 0:38 3:33    
10 Panarin - 16 Strome - 17 Fast 0:41 3:57             1:05 3:59      
10 Panarin - 93 Zibanejad - 17 Fast 3:10 0:28 0:19           2:43 1:44 0:09    
10 Panarin - 16 Strome - 20 Kreider - 93 Zibanejad           1:55   1:17 3:01 0:25      
21 Howden - 72 Chytil - 24 Kakko 0:23 0:44 1:21 0:23           0:56 1:42    
16 Strome - 93 Zibanejad         1:17   1:02         1:17 1:02
48 Lemieux - 72 Chytil - 24 Kakko 0:11   0:04     0:22   1:01 0:32 0:34      
8 Trouba - 42 Smith 2:31 2:04 3:36 1:05 0:32   0:56   3:52 5:08 2:29 0:36 1:08
23 Fox - 55 Lindgren 4:23 1:43 3:02 2:32         4:56 3:51 3:51    
18 Staal - 77 Deangelo 3:04 3:11 0:08 2:19   0:06     5:01 2:08 2:53    
18 Staal - 55 Lindgren   0:14 0:05   1:52   1:28   0:01 0:14 0:39 2:02 1:29
8 Trouba - 23 Fox 0:40   0:08 0:20   0:27   0:51 0:49 1:14 0:11    
77 Deangelo           1:55   1:17 3:01 0:25      
8 Trouba - 18 Staal 0:35 0:18 0:16   0:13       0:58 0:24 0:16 0:13  
23 Fox - 77 Deangelo 0:51 0:49 0:31           0:19 1:19 1:14    

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Danault 62.7% 62.7%    
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar 13.1%   13.1%  
Tatar-Domi 7.3% 7.3%    
Domi-Suzuki-Tatar 5.3% 5.3%    
Tatar-Suzuki 4.9% 4.9%    
Others 6.6% 5.7% 0.9%  
Totals   85.9% 14.1%  
13 Domi
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Weal 51.0% 50.4%   0.6%
Armia-Weal-Hudon 14.4%   14.4%  
Tatar-Gallagher 8.7% 8.7%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 6.3% 6.3%    
Hudon-Weal 6.1% 6.1%    
Others 13.4% 12.3% 1.1%  
Totals   83.9% 15.5% 0.6%
14 Suzuki
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Armia 60.9% 60.9%    
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar 17.0%   17.0%  
Gallagher-Domi-Tatar 6.8% 6.8%    
Tatar-Gallagher 6.4% 6.4%    
Tatar-Armia 3.7% 3.7%    
Others 5.1% 4.1% 1.0%  
Totals   82.0% 18.0%  
22 Weise
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Evans 65.4% 65.4%    
Byron-Evans 19.9% 15.2% 4.7%  
Hudon-Domi 8.0% 8.0%    
Suzuki-Evans 2.2% 1.4% 0.9%  
Lehkonen-Suzuki 2.2% 2.2%    
Others 2.2% 2.2%    
Totals   94.5% 5.5%  
24 Danault
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Tatar-Gallagher 63.6% 63.6%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar 13.3%   13.3%  
Lehkonen 12.6% 0.6%   12.0%
Armia 2.6%     2.6%
Tatar-Armia 2.3% 2.3%    
Others 5.5% 4.8% 0.8%  
Totals   71.3% 14.1% 14.6%
40 Armia
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki 55.8% 55.8%    
Domi-Weal-Hudon 14.3%   14.3%  
Byron 13.7%     13.7%
Tatar-Suzuki 3.4% 3.4%    
Danault 3.1%     3.1%
Others 9.7% 8.1% 1.6%  
Totals   67.3% 15.9% 16.8%
41 Byron
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Domi-Weal 59.9% 59.2%   0.7%
Armia 16.3%     16.3%
Evans-Weise 13.6% 10.4% 3.2%  
Domi-Gallagher 3.4% 3.4%    
Lehkonen 2.4%     2.4%
Others 4.5% 4.5%    
Totals   77.5% 3.2% 19.3%
43 Weal
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Byron-Domi 61.2% 60.5%   0.7%
Domi-Armia-Hudon 17.3%   17.3%  
Hudon-Domi 7.3% 7.3%    
Tatar-Domi 4.5% 4.5%    
Hudon-Evans 3.3% 3.3%    
Others 6.4% 4.2% 2.2%  
Totals   79.8% 19.5% 0.7%
54 Hudon
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Evans-Weise 53.8% 53.8%    
Domi-Armia-Weal 20.5%   20.5%  
Domi-Weal 8.7% 8.7%    
Domi-Weise 6.6% 6.6%    
Weal-Evans 3.8% 3.8%    
Others 6.6% 3.3% 3.3%  
Totals   76.2% 23.8%  
62 Lehkonen
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Suzuki-Armia 70.7% 70.7%    
Danault 18.6% 0.9%   17.8%
Danault-Armia 3.3% 3.3%    
Byron 2.5%     2.5%
Suzuki-Weise 1.6% 1.6%    
Others 3.3% 3.3%    
Totals   79.7%   20.3%
71 Evans
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Hudon-Weise 67.0% 67.0%    
Byron-Weise 20.4% 15.6% 4.8%  
Hudon-Weal 4.8% 4.8%    
Byron-Weal 2.7% 2.7%    
Weise-Suzuki 2.3% 1.4% 0.9%  
Others 2.8% 2.8%    
Totals   94.3% 5.7%  
90 Tatar
Linemates Total EV PP SH
Danault-Gallagher 60.2% 60.2%    
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault 12.6%   12.6%  
Domi-Gallagher 7.0% 7.0%    
Gallagher-Domi-Suzuki 5.1% 5.1%    
Suzuki-Gallagher 4.7% 4.7%    
Others 10.4% 9.1% 1.3%  
Totals   86.1% 13.9%  

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber
Partner Total EV PP SH
Chiarot 80.9% 67.2%   13.7%
  10.9%   10.9%  
Petry 4.4% 4.4%    
Kulak 3.3% 3.3%    
Alzner 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   75.3% 10.9% 13.7%
8 Chiarot
Partner Total EV PP SH
Weber 88.8% 73.7%   15.1%
Kulak 8.0% 7.5%   0.5%
Alzner 1.5% 1.5%    
Folin 0.6% 0.6%    
Petry 0.5%   0.5%  
Others 0.5% 0.5%    
Totals   83.8% 0.5% 15.6%
26 Petry
Partner Total EV PP SH
Kulak 76.7% 70.2% 1.6% 4.9%
  13.6%   13.6%  
Weber 5.0% 5.0%    
Folin 3.0% 2.6% 0.4%  
Chiarot-Kulak 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 1.1% 0.6% 0.6%  
Totals   79.0% 16.1% 4.9%
27 Alzner
Partner Total EV PP SH
Folin 95.0% 94.3%   0.7%
Chiarot 2.4% 2.4%    
Weber 0.9% 0.9%    
Petry 0.9% 0.9%    
Kulak 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   99.3%   0.7%
32 Folin
Partner Total EV PP SH
Alzner 87.1% 86.4%   0.7%
Kulak 7.6% 0.3%   7.3%
Petry 4.3% 3.8% 0.6%  
Chiarot 0.9% 0.9%    
Totals   91.4% 0.6% 8.0%
77 Kulak
Partner Total EV PP SH
Petry 80.6% 73.8% 1.7% 5.2%
Chiarot 8.8% 8.2%   0.6%
Folin 5.6% 0.3%   5.3%
Weber 3.9% 3.9%    
Alzner 0.6% 0.6%    
Others 0.6% 0.6%    
Totals   87.3% 1.7% 11.1%
Back to main page