Game #67 - February 29, 2020 - Carolina 3 at Montreal 4 (OT)

Game #67 - February 29, 2020

Carolina

Montreal

4 (OT)

All times below are based on data from NHL.com.

NHL.com links:

Scoresheet Super Stats
Faceoff Comparison
Play By Play

Lines and defensive pairings

Line

Time

+/-

41 Byron

13 Domi

43 Weal

12:20

12:20

0:00

62 Lehkonen

14 Suzuki

40 Armia

10:09

10:09

0:00

-1

90 Tatar

24 Danault

11 Gallagher

10:02

10:02

0:00

54 Hudon

71 Evans

22 Weise

5:40

5:40

0:00

11 Gallagher - 14 Suzuki - 24 Danault - 90 Tatar

3:22

0:12

3:10

0:00

13 Domi - 40 Armia - 43 Weal - 54 Hudon

2:19

0:02

2:17

0:00

24 Danault

90 Tatar

1:24

1:24

0:00

40 Armia

41 Byron

1:20

0:00

1:20

54 Hudon

13 Domi

22 Weise

1:15

1:15

0:00

24 Danault

62 Lehkonen

1:09

0:00

1:09

Others

11:52

9:16

0:33

2:03

-1

Pair

Time

+/-

77 Kulak

26 Petry

18:52

18:52

0:00

8 Chiarot

6 Weber

18:52

16:06

0:00

2:46

61 Ouellet

32 Folin

9:46

9:46

0:00

-1

26 Petry

4:42

1:04

3:38

0:00

6 Weber

2:15

0:03

2:12

0:00

61 Ouellet

26 Petry

1:42

0:50

0:00

0:52

61 Ouellet

6 Weber

1:34

1:14

0:00

0:20

Others

3:09

2:25

0:10

0:34

Line match-ups:

Line/Pair

41PB
13MD
43JW

62AL
14NS
40JA

90TT
24PD
11BG

54CH
71JE
22DW

11BG
14NS
24PD
90TT

13MD
40JA
43JW
54CH

8BC
6SW

77BK
26JP

61XO
32CF

26JP

6SW

88 Necas - 16 Trocheck - 37 Svechnikov

2:15

2:11

1:32

2:41

3:43

0:18

86 Teravainen - 20 Aho - 37 Svechnikov

0:08

0:32

3:08

0:16

3:53

0:39

0:36

23 McGinn - 48 Martinook - 18 Dzingel

0:24

0:53

2:39

0:52

0:41

3:04

88 Necas - 16 Trocheck - 21 Niederreiter

2:17

1:23

0:34

3:10

86 Teravainen - 20 Aho - 18 Dzingel

0:11

0:09

1:32

2:11

1:13

0:05

14 Williams - 11 Staal - 21 Niederreiter

3:04

0:04

0:29

1:11

1:41

0:51

13 Foegele - 11 Staal - 14 Williams

1:27

0:42

0:23

1:27

1:00

86 Teravainen - 14 Williams - 20 Aho - 37 Svechnikov

2:35

86 Teravainen - 20 Aho

1:08

0:24

1:32

0:28

13 Foegele - 48 Martinook - 23 McGinn

0:14

0:11

1:44

0:01

2:06

14 Williams - 20 Aho - 21 Niederreiter

0:13

0:23

1:14

1:03

1:06

13 Foegele - 11 Staal - 23 McGinn

0:48

0:45

0:54

0:24

6 Edmundson - 74 Slavin

5:05

3:19

3:25

0:34

2:09

1:18

5:34

7:31

2:21

2:18

1:17

4 Fleury - 76 Skjei

6:25

2:08

2:46

2:02

0:25

0:57

5:42

5:37

3:38

0:43

0:53

51 Gardiner - 57 Van Riemsdyk

0:03

3:08

1:18

2:34

2:16

3:08

2:27

74 Slavin

2:35

0:37

Shift chart:
(green = even-strength, red = power-play, blue = short-handed)

For each forward: most common linemates
(as a percentage of total ice time)

11 Gallagher

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Tatar-Danault	65.7%	65.7%
Suzuki-Danault-Tatar	22.1%	1.3%	20.7%
Lehkonen-Suzuki	2.5%	2.5%
Danault	2.5%	2.3%		0.2%
Tatar-Suzuki	2.5%	2.5%
Others	4.7%	4.3%		0.4%
Totals		78.6%	20.7%	0.7%

13 Domi

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Byron-Weal	65.0%	65.0%
Armia-Weal-Hudon	12.2%	0.2%	12.0%
Hudon-Weise	6.6%	6.6%
Byron-Evans	4.8%	4.8%
Byron	3.4%	3.4%
Others	7.9%	5.3%	2.1%	0.5%
Totals		85.3%	14.1%	0.5%

14 Suzuki

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Lehkonen-Armia	59.6%	59.6%
Gallagher-Danault-Tatar	19.8%	1.2%	18.6%
Lehkonen-Danault	3.7%	3.7%
Armia	3.1%	3.1%
Tatar-Gallagher	2.3%	2.3%
Others	11.5%	5.1%	1.8%	4.7%
Totals		75.0%	20.4%	4.7%

22 Weise

Linemates	Total	EV
Hudon-Evans	78.0%	78.0%
Hudon-Domi	17.2%	17.2%
Hudon-Suzuki	1.8%	1.8%
Hudon-Danault	1.8%	1.8%
Byron-Domi	1.1%	1.1%
Totals		100.0%

24 Danault

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Tatar-Gallagher	50.2%	50.2%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Tatar	16.8%	1.0%	15.8%
Tatar	7.0%	7.0%
Lehkonen	5.8%			5.8%
Lehkonen-Suzuki	3.2%	3.2%
Others	17.1%	14.8%	1.2%	1.1%
Totals		76.2%	17.0%	6.8%

40 Armia

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Lehkonen-Suzuki	61.3%	61.3%
Domi-Weal-Hudon	14.0%	0.2%	13.8%
Byron	8.0%			8.0%
Suzuki	3.2%	3.2%
Lehkonen-Danault	2.5%	2.5%
Others	11.0%	4.4%	2.4%	4.1%
Totals		71.6%	16.2%	12.2%

41 Byron

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Domi-Weal	72.1%	72.1%
Armia	7.8%		7.8%
Domi-Evans	5.4%	5.4%
Domi	3.8%	3.8%
Evans-Lehkonen	3.4%	3.4%
Others	7.6%	5.8%	1.8%
Totals		90.5%	9.5%

43 Weal

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Byron-Domi	74.4%	74.4%
Domi-Armia-Hudon	14.0%	0.2%	13.8%
Tatar-Danault	3.6%	3.6%
Hudon-Domi	2.0%	2.0%
Tatar-Domi	1.4%	1.2%		0.2%
Others	4.6%	2.7%	1.9%
Totals		84.1%	15.7%	0.2%

54 Hudon

Linemates	Total	EV	PP
Evans-Weise	54.5%	54.5%
Domi-Armia-Weal	22.3%	0.3%	22.0%
Domi-Weise	12.0%	12.0%
Domi-Weal	3.2%	3.2%
Weal-Evans	1.8%	1.8%
Others	6.3%	4.0%	2.2%
Totals		75.8%	24.2%

62 Lehkonen

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Suzuki-Armia	66.6%	66.6%
Danault	7.5%		7.5%
Evans	4.9%		4.9%
Danault-Suzuki	4.2%	4.2%
Byron-Evans	3.8%	3.8%
Others	13.0%	9.4%	3.6%
Totals		83.9%	16.1%

71 Evans

Linemates	Total	EV	SH
Hudon-Weise	57.1%	57.1%
Byron-Domi	9.2%	9.2%
Lehkonen	7.6%		7.6%
Tatar-Danault	6.1%	6.1%
Byron-Lehkonen	5.9%	5.9%
Others	14.1%	9.7%	4.4%
Totals		88.1%	11.9%

90 Tatar

Linemates	Total	EV	PP	SH
Danault-Gallagher	58.1%	58.1%
Gallagher-Suzuki-Danault	19.5%	1.2%	18.3%
Danault	8.1%	8.1%
Danault-Evans	3.5%	3.5%
Danault-Weal	3.5%	3.5%
Others	7.4%	6.0%	0.9%	0.6%
Totals		80.2%	19.2%	0.6%

For each D-man: most common partners
(as a percentage of total ice time)

6 Weber

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Chiarot	79.8%	68.1%		11.7%
	9.5%	0.2%	9.3%
Ouellet	6.6%	5.2%		1.4%
Folin	1.8%	1.8%
Chiarot-Kulak	1.5%	1.5%
Others	0.7%		0.7%
Totals		76.9%	10.0%	13.1%

8 Chiarot

Partner	Total	EV	SH
Weber	90.8%	77.5%	13.3%
Kulak	4.3%	4.3%
Folin	2.1%	2.1%
Kulak-Weber	1.7%	1.7%
Petry	0.7%	0.6%	0.2%
Others	0.5%		0.5%
Totals		86.0%	14.0%

26 Petry

Partner	Total	EV	PP	SH
Kulak	73.7%	73.7%
	18.4%	4.2%	14.2%
Ouellet	6.6%	3.3%		3.4%
Weber	0.7%		0.7%
Chiarot	0.6%	0.5%		0.1%
Totals		81.6%	14.9%	3.5%

32 Folin

Partner	Total	EV
Ouellet	91.8%	91.8%
Chiarot	4.1%	4.1%
Weber	4.1%	4.1%
Totals		100.0%

61 Ouellet

Partner	Total	EV	SH
Folin	73.2%	73.3%
Petry	12.8%	6.3%	6.5%
Weber	11.8%	9.3%	2.5%
Kulak	1.5%	1.5%
Chiarot	0.8%		0.8%
Totals		90.3%	9.8%

77 Kulak

Partner	Total	EV
Petry	92.9%	92.9%
Chiarot	4.4%	4.4%
Chiarot-Weber	1.7%	1.7%
Ouellet	1.0%	1.0%
Totals		100.0%

Back to main page